UPF Lawsuit Blames Food Industry for 14-Year-Old’s Type 2 Diabetes Diagnosis

Complaint alleges major food manufacturers engaged in a conspiracy to coordinate marketing campaigns aimed at increasing consumption of ultra-processed foods among children and teenagers.

A new lawsuit claims some of the largest food manufacturers in the United States contributed to a teenager developing Type 2 diabetes and other serious health conditions through the design and promotion of ultra-processed foods (UPFs).

The complaint (PDF) was filed by Zambia Ford, on behalf of her minor son, D.P., in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas on March 5. It names a number of major food companies as defendants, including The Kraft Heinz Company, Mondelez International Inc., Post Holdings Inc., The Coca-Cola Company, PepsiCo Inc., General Mills Inc., Nestlé USA Inc., Kellanova, WK Kellogg Co., Mars Incorporated Inc. and ConAgra Brands Inc.

Ultra-processed foods are industrially manufactured products made primarily from refined ingredients, additives and chemical formulations rather than whole foods. They include items like sugary cereals, packaged snacks, sodas and frozen meals designed for convenience and long shelf life. However, researchers note that these products are often engineered to be highly palatable and easy to overconsume, warning that diets high in UPFs may be linked to obesity, cardiovascular disease, Type 2 diabetes and other chronic health problems.

As research continues to link ultra-processed foods to these kinds of disorders, a number of processed food lawsuits have emerged in recent years alleging that childhood diets high in such products have contributed to the diagnoses. 

Complaints claim food manufacturers knew their products were designed to encourage repeated consumption, yet continued targeting children and teenagers with extensive marketing campaigns aimed at building early brand loyalty and long-term eating habits.

According to the new complaint, Ford’s son regularly consumed ultra-processed food products made by the defendant companies. The lawsuit alleges those products were heavily marketed to children through advertising campaigns, branding and product design intended to encourage frequent consumption.

As a result of years of exposure, the teenager allegedly developed Type 2 diabetes and non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) while still a minor. The complaint claims those conditions will likely have lifelong health consequences.

More broadly, the lawsuit alleges food manufacturers engaged in coordinated strategies to expand consumption of ultra-processed foods among children and teenagers. The companies are accused of designing products with combinations of sugar, fat and salt intended to stimulate repeated consumption while funding research and public messaging that downplayed potential health risks.

The complaint further alleges the industry funded biased research, used trade groups and paid experts to challenge unfavorable scientific findings, and lobbied regulators to slow oversight of ultra-processed food products.

Plaintiffs argue these tactics resemble strategies historically used by the tobacco industry, alleging companies prioritized profits while minimizing or concealing evidence about potential health harms.

The lawsuit also claims manufacturers failed to adequately warn consumers about the long-term health risks associated with frequent consumption of ultra-processed foods.

“Had D.P. not regularly, frequently, and chronically ingested UPP manufactured, marketed, and sold by Defendants Kraft Heinz, Mondelez, Post Holdings, Coca-Cola, PepsiCo, General Mills, Nestle, Kellogg’s, Mars and Conagra, over the course of many years, he would not have been diagnosed Type 2 Diabetes at the age of 14.”

— Zambia Ford et al v. The Kraft Heinz Company et al

Ford raises allegations of negligence, failure to warn, breach of implied warranty, negligent misrepresentation, fraudulent non-disclosure, fraudulent concealment, unjust enrichment, conspiracy and violations of consumer protection laws.

The complaint seeks compensatory, economic, statutory and punitive damages, arguing the companies knowingly placed profits ahead of consumer health.

Ultra-Processed Foods Lawsuits

The case comes amid growing concern among public health experts about the role ultra-processed foods may play in rising rates of childhood obesity and metabolic disease in the United States.

Against this backdrop, an increasing number of ultra-processed food lawsuits have been filed against major food manufacturers by individuals who claim long-term consumption of ultra-processed foods contributed to serious health conditions such as Type 2 diabetes and fatty liver disease.

Many of the complaints allege food companies deliberately engineered and marketed these products in ways designed to encourage frequent consumption, particularly among younger consumers.

Ultra-processed food attorneys representing plaintiffs are currently reviewing additional cases nationwide involving individuals who regularly consumed UPFs during childhood and later developed metabolic illnesses.

Sign up for more legal news that could affect you or your family.