Prostate Biopsies More Accurate At Teaching Hospitals: Study

Men who get a prostate biopsy at a community hospital may be more likely later be re-diagnosed with a higher risk of prostate cancer than if they were biopsied at a teaching hospital, according to the findings of new research that suggests teaching hospital biopsies may be more accurate. 

In a study published in the medical journal Prostate Cancer and Prostatic Diseases, researchers at Princess Margaret Medical Center in Canada examined data on nearly 400 men who received initial biopsies at either a community hospital or academic hospital, and were placed on active surveillance; a “wait and watch” approach to cancer.

Nearly 27% of men who receive their initial diagnosis from a community hospital were reclassified with high-risk cancer diagnoses later, compared to only 14% who received the initial biopsy from an academic medical facility.

Did You Know?

AT&T Data Breach Impacts Millions of Customers

More than 73 million customers of AT&T may have had their names, addresses, phone numbers, Social Security numbers and other information released on the dark web due to a massive AT&T data breach. Lawsuits are being pursued to obtain financial compensation.

Learn More

Patients placed on active surveillance are typically monitored by doctors, but are not treated right away, because the tumors are small and slow growing. The men were diagnosed with low-risk prostate cancer. Each then received another biopsy from the academic research hospital, Princess Margaret.

Academic medical centers are hospitals affiliated with a medical school, where medical students receive their practical training.

Often, certain procedures not routinely done in other hospitals will be conducted more frequently at a teaching hospital, potentially offering a higher level of care. However, some studies have suggested that teaching hospital patients have higher rates of infection and face a higher risk of a medical mistake that causes harm.

Nearly 20% of men biopsied at a community hospital were given a cancer misdiagnosis and had to later be upgraded from low-risk to aggressive tumor growth on the second biopsy, meaning at least half of the tissue sampled was malignant. This is compared to seven percent of men who received their first biopsy at a medical research center.

Study authors say tumors biopsied at a non-academic facility are three to four times more likely to be upgraded in grade or volume. The grade of a cancer tumor indicates how quickly it is growing and the volume is the percentage of the prostate taken by the tumor.

When reclassified men typically need to treat the cancer, as opposed to active surveillance.

Some men first treated at a community hospital often wait six months or longer to receive a second follow-up biopsy when placed under active surveillance, potentially leading to a high-risk reclassification because of the delay.

A rectal ultrasound was used to determine if the tissues to be removed were abnormal. Critics say the use of ultrasound guided biopsy is a flaw of the study, since it is much less accurate than targeted biopsies guided by MRI images, which is typically used at academic medical centers.

More than 200,000 men are diagnosed with prostate cancer every year. More than 30,000 of those men will die because of that diagnosis. While prostate cancer is highly treatable, a misdiagnosis or ignoring a potentially high-risk diagnosis can be fatal.

Overall, researchers say the results of the study are very accurate and point to the importance of getting a specialist at a medical research hospital to do the first biopsy, or immediately seeking their opinion if receiving an abnormal test from a community hospital, instead of opting for active surveillance.


Share Your Comments

I authorize the above comments be posted on this page*

Want your comments reviewed by a lawyer?

To have an attorney review your comments and contact you about a potential case, provide your contact information below. This will not be published.

NOTE: Providing information for review by an attorney does not form an attorney-client relationship.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

More Top Stories

BioZorb Lawsuit Alleges Breast Tissue Marker Failed, Requiring Surgical Removal
BioZorb Lawsuit Alleges Breast Tissue Marker Failed, Requiring Surgical Removal (Posted yesterday)

A BioZorb lawsuit has been filed by several breast cancer survivors after the BioZorb implants moved out of place and failed to dissolve int he body, requiring surgical removal.

Fairness Hearing For Philips CPAP Recall Medical Monitoring Settlement Set for October
Fairness Hearing For Philips CPAP Recall Medical Monitoring Settlement Set for October (Posted yesterday)

A U.S. District Court judge has scheduled a fairness hearing for October in order to determine whether final approval should be granted to a $25 million Philips CPAP recall settlement agreement, which would pay former users $25 million to pay for future medical monitoring needs.