Pseudotumor Cerebri Lawsuit Filed Over Side Effects of Mirena IUD Birth Control
Bayer Healthcare faces a new product liability lawsuit brought by a woman who alleges that side effects of the Mirena IUD caused her to suffer a dangerous buildup of pressure on the brain, known as pseudotumor cerebri.
The complaint (PDF) was filed by 31 year old Jennifer Santiago in the U.S. District Court for the District of New Jersey on March 24, indicating that she experienced blackouts, severe headaches and vision loss as a result of brain fluid pressure caused by the popular birth control implant.
Santiago received the intrauterine device (IUD) in April 2007, without complication. However, a few years later she began to experience pseudotumor cerebri problems from Mirena, which causes cerebrospinal fluid levels to become elevated and increase pressure in the skull. She experienced symptoms similar to a tumor, with blackout episodes, severe headaches, and loss of peripheral vision.
Did You Know?
Millions of Philips CPAP Machines Recalled
Philips DreamStation, CPAP and BiPAP machines sold in recent years may pose a risk of cancer, lung damage and other injuries.
Learn MoreAfter experiencing the symptoms, Santiago had the Mirena IUD removed and she was eventually diagnosed with pseudotumor cerebri (PTC); which is also known as idiopathic intracranial hypertension (IIH).
As a result of Bayer’s alleged failure to adequately warn about the link between Mirena and pseudotumor cerebri, Santiago indicates that most doctors remain unaware that the birth control implant may be a potential cause of migraines, vision problems or a buildup of pressure around the brain.
Santiago’s complaint is one of a growing number of Mirena pseudotumor cerebri lawsuits filed against Bayer by women who say the company failed to provide adequate warnings of health risks.
“Defendants did not disclose an unreasonably dangerous condition regarding its Mirena, namely, that hormones in Mirena can cause or substantially contribute to the development of papilledema and/or IIH/PTC,” the lawsuit states. “Despite an increasing number of adverse events, including reports of intracranial hypertension, blindness, papilledema, and increased intracranial pressure, Defendants have made no effort to warn physicians, the healthcare community, or patients of the risk of developing IIH/PTC with Mirena.”
Mirena is an increasingly popular form of long-acting birth control, allowing women to avoid pregnancy for up to five years without needing to remember to take a daily pill. However, a number of women have reported experiencing a number of different complications from Mirena.
In addition to problems with pseudotumor cererbri, Mirena has also been linked to reports of the IUD perforating the uterus or moving out of position, causing severe internal injuries for many women.
In several other places around the world, including South Africa and Hong Kong, Mirena warning labels include information about the risk that papilledema as a possible side effect of Mirena. However, Bayer has not given women in America or the U.S. medical community the same warning.
Amid a growing number of Mirena pseudotumor cerebri cases brought throughout the federal court system, a request was filed last year with the U.S. Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation (JPML) to centralize the cases before one judge. However, that request was rejected, so Santiago’s claim and others filed by other women are proceeding without coordinated pretrial proceedings.
There is a separate multidistrict litigation (MDL) established for Mirena migration injury lawsuits, which currently includes about 4,000 complaints pending before U.S. District Judge Cathy Seibel in the Southern District of New York, where a small group of “bellwether” cases are being prepared for early trial dates.
Get more articles like this sent directly to your inbox.
"*" indicates required fields
6 Comments
ElizabethMay 1, 2016 at 1:10 pm
I had the implant in 2008 after my daughter was born. I had it removed a year later. I have been dealing with horrible headaches, blurred vision, ringing in the ears, concentration issues, nausea, spots/floating things in my vision, etc since then. Up until 2014 I was just told it was low B12 or some other thing. I went to the eye Dr in 2014 and had a visual field test done. Between the results of[Show More]I had the implant in 2008 after my daughter was born. I had it removed a year later. I have been dealing with horrible headaches, blurred vision, ringing in the ears, concentration issues, nausea, spots/floating things in my vision, etc since then. Up until 2014 I was just told it was low B12 or some other thing. I went to the eye Dr in 2014 and had a visual field test done. Between the results of that, the optic nerve swelling, and vision now of 20/400 I was referred to an opthalmologist, who diagnosed me at that time with almost 100% certainty. He referred me to a neurologist. I have been taking Diamox for 2 years. If you are experiencing any symptoms like those go to an opthalmologist. Get a visual field test done. It took me 6 years and cost me a big part of my vision. Keep looking and do not give up or get discouraged. The symptoms are horrible but with the right doctor can be controlled.
mirriyaApril 13, 2016 at 12:18 am
i will say i really hope NO woman gets this birth control!!!!
MirandaApril 5, 2016 at 3:43 am
In response to the other comments... You need to see a neurosurgeon or neuroopthamolgist to be correctly diagnosed with PTC/IIH. I was diagnosed a few years back and have had lumbar peritoneal shunt surgery twice. I'm currently in the hospital doing epilepsy testing for a week because of how bad my blackouts are getting. If you feel this is even a possibility for you, go seek help and don't get d[Show More]In response to the other comments... You need to see a neurosurgeon or neuroopthamolgist to be correctly diagnosed with PTC/IIH. I was diagnosed a few years back and have had lumbar peritoneal shunt surgery twice. I'm currently in the hospital doing epilepsy testing for a week because of how bad my blackouts are getting. If you feel this is even a possibility for you, go seek help and don't get discouraged. You will find out that 3/4 of the doctors don't even know what PTC/IIH is. Keep pushing til you get answers! I have the lawyers information at home. It's a huge packet of paperwork to do. But you do have to have a doctors diagnoses before you file the papers.
ConstanceApril 4, 2016 at 6:08 pm
I had implant since 2014. My symptom are the same as hers. Doctor gives me no answers to why or link to it being the implant. Please contact
SandraApril 1, 2016 at 12:27 pm
You would think after the IUD debacle in the 70's, they would have learned a lesson. The common complaint being perforation of the uterus. That tells me they knew once again the dangers and kept them concealed. I hope it doesn't take as long to get justice. And you can hardly call it justice, the pay out for the damage that was endured by some of the complaintants was a joke.
MelissaMarch 31, 2016 at 6:52 pm
How do I get more information? I've had Mirena IUD since April 2014.