Qualitest Birth Control Recall Lawsuit Centralization Sought in MDL

|

Amid a mounting number of product liability lawsuits filed against Endo Pharmaceuticals and its Qualitest subsidiary over a 2011 birth control pill recall, a request has been filed to centralize the federal litigation before one judge for coordinate pretrial proceedings.

A Qualitest birth control pill recallย was issued issued in September 2011, after it was discovered that some of the pill-containing blister packages were rotated 180 degrees during packaging, reversing the weekly tablet orientation and leading some women to take the pills in the wrong order.

The packaging error left women without birth control protection, and reportedly led to a number of unintended pregnancies.

Spinal-Cord-Stimulation-Lawsuit
Spinal-Cord-Stimulation-Lawsuit

While there are currently only four lawsuits filed against Qualitest in four different federal district courts nationwide, a request to consolidate the litigation that was filed last month indicates that number is likely to grow.

According to a motion (PDF) filed with the U.S. Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation (JPML) on April 30, plaintiffs Angela Shepherd and Lauren Betancourt ask that cases pending throughout the federal court system be transferred to the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Georgia. Plaintiffs indicate that there are at least 113 individuals with identical claims that have not yet been filed.

All of the Qualitest birth control lawsuits involve similar allegations, that women suffered damages or injuries, primarily though unwanted pregnancies, due to erroneous packaging of the pills.

The recall affected more than 70 lots of Qualitest birth control pills, including Cyclafem 7/7/7, Cyclafem 1/35, Emoquette, Gildess FE 1.5/30, Gildess FE 1/20, Orsythia, Previfem and Tri-Previfem. Millions of blister packs were affected.

It was the third Qualitest drug recall over labeling problemsย that year. In June 2011, a manufacturing problem led toย labels being swapped between bottles of generic Vicodin and Fioricet.ย On February 5, 2011, three lots ofย generic Vicodin and Phenobarbital were recalledย after a bottle of Qualitest generic Vicodin was found with a Phenobarbital label.

Plaintiffs argue that centralizing the cases as part of an MDL would serve the convenience of the parties, prevent duplicative discovery and avoid conflicting pretrial rulings.

The U.S. JPML is expected to hear oral arguments on the motion during an upcoming hearing scheduled for July 31, in Kansas City, Kansas.

Irvin Jackson
Written by: Irvin Jackson

Senior Legal Journalist & Contributing Editor

Irvin Jackson is a senior investigative reporter at AboutLawsuits.com with more than 30 years of experience covering mass tort litigation, environmental policy, and consumer safety. He previously served as Associate Editor at Inside the EPA and contributes original reporting on product liability lawsuits, regulatory failures, and nationwide litigation trends.

Image Credit: |



0 Comments


This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

Share Your Comments

This field is hidden when viewing the form
I authorize the above comments be posted on this page
Post Comment
Weekly Digest Opt-In

Want your comments reviewed by a lawyer?

To have an attorney review your comments and contact you about a potential case, provide your contact information below. This will not be published.

NOTE: Providing information for review by an attorney does not form an attorney-client relationship.

MORE TOP STORIES

Federal regulators have centralized at least 23 Boston Scientific spinal cord stimulator lawsuits in a multidistrict litigation that excludes multiple similar claims involving Abbott and Nevro implants.
Regeneron and Sanofi-Aventis face a Dupixent injection lawsuit from a Louisiana woman who says the companies knew about the drug’s risks but downplayed them to doctors and patients.