Roundup NHL Lawsuit Filed Over Farmer’s Cancer Diagnosis Following Decades Of Use

A North Carolina farmer who developed non-Hodgkins lymphoma (NHL) indicates that the cancer diagnosis was a direct result of exposure to Roundup, after spraying the popular weedkiller for more than two decades.

The complaint (PDF) was filed by William Prince in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina on May 26, alleging that Monsanto misrepresented the safety of Roundup and it’s active ingredient, glyphosate, resulting in long-term exposure that increases the cancer risk for farmers and others in the agriculture industry.

Prince states that he sprayed Roundup approximately 90 days each year, for at least 22 years, while working as a farmer between 1976 and 1998. Although he followed all safety and precautionary warnings while using Roundup, Prince was subsequently diagnosed with NHL, which has recently been identified as a potential risk associated with glyphosate contained in the weedkiller.

Roundup-Cancer-Lawsuit-Lawyer
Roundup-Cancer-Lawsuit-Lawyer

“Had [Monsanto] properly disclosed the risks associated with Roundup, Plaintiff would have avoided the risk of NHL by not using Roundup,” according to the complaint. “Defendant’s failure to provide adequate warnings and instructions regarding the dangers and risks associated with Roundup was a proximate cause of Plaintiff’s injuries.”

Concerns about the link between Roundup and NHL emerged in mid-2015, after the World Health Organization’s International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) classified glyphosate as a likely cancer-causing agent.

Since then, hundreds of similar Roundup lawsuits have been filed by farmer, landscapers, agricultural works and others diagnosed with cancer following regular use of the weedkiller.

Given the similar questions of fact and law raised in the complaints, Prince’s case will be consolidated with other Roundup claims, which are centralized before U.S. District Judge Vince Chhabria in the Northern District of California as part of a federal MDL, or multidistrict litigation. However, if Roundup settlements or another resolution for the litigation is not reached following the coordinated pretrial proceedings, each of the cases may be remanded back to the U.S. District Court where it was originally filed for a separate trial date in the future.

Written by: Irvin Jackson

Senior Legal Journalist & Contributing Editor

Irvin Jackson is a senior investigative reporter at AboutLawsuits.com with more than 30 years of experience covering mass tort litigation, environmental policy, and consumer safety. He previously served as Associate Editor at Inside the EPA and contributes original reporting on product liability lawsuits, regulatory failures, and nationwide litigation trends.

Image Credit: test caption



0 Comments


This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

Share Your Comments

This field is hidden when viewing the form
I authorize the above comments be posted on this page
Post Comment
Weekly Digest Opt-In

Want your comments reviewed by a lawyer?

To have an attorney review your comments and contact you about a potential case, provide your contact information below. This will not be published.

NOTE: Providing information for review by an attorney does not form an attorney-client relationship.

MORE TOP STORIES

Researchers warn that sports-betting apps use reward-based design and constant engagement tactics that can fuel addiction among young adults—sparking a surge of lawsuits accusing major platforms of exploiting these vulnerabilities for profit.
Breast mesh products marketed as “internal bras” for lift and augmentation surgeries are now under investigation amid reports of painful complications, and questions over manufacturers’ prior knowledge of mesh-related risks.
A federal judge has set key scheduling deadlines for the four first bellwether trials over claims that BioZorb breast markers are defectively designed.