Class Action Lawsuit Over COVID-19 Business Losses Coverage Filed Against The Cincinnati Insurance Co.

The owners of a Missouri hair salon have filed a class action lawsuit against The Cincinnati Insurance Company, over failure to provide insurance coverage for business losses caused by the COVID-19 pandemic and resulting shutdown orders issued by government officials.

The complaint (PDF) was filed in the U.S. District Court for the Western District of Missouri on April 27, by the small business Studio 417, Inc., which operates hair salons in the Springfield area.

The lawsuit seeks class action status to pursue damages for all individuals and small businesses that have been denied coverage by The Cinncinnati Insurance Company following the COVID-19 pandemic that has emerged over the past few months.

Did You Know?

AT&T Data Breach Impacts Millions of Customers

More than 73 million customers of AT&T may have had their names, addresses, phone numbers, Social Security numbers and other information released on the dark web due to a massive AT&T data breach. Lawsuits are being pursued to obtain financial compensation.

Learn More

Studio 417 indicates it paid premiums to The Cincinnati Insurance Company, which included coverage for potential business losses due to a variety of possible causes. However, the lawsuit indicates the insurance company failed to live up to its end of the contract after the salons had to suspend operations due to the pandemic and resulting state “stay home” orders.

The COVID-19 business loss coverage class action lawsuit alleges that The Cincinnati Company has refused to reimburse customers, even though it has no legal standing refuse coverage, thus violating the insurance contract.

In recent weeks a number of individual lawsuits and class action lawsuits have been filed by restaurant owners and other small businesses who were denied COVID-19 business interruption insurance coverage, even though they paid premiums to insure against lost business.

While many insurance companies have argued the claims are not covered due to policy provisions that exclude losses due to viral outbreaks, some small business owners indicate that claims have been denied even when policies do not contain that clause. In addition, in many situations the business owners point out that their losses were not caused by viral infections or illnesses, but rather resulted from government “stay-at-home” orders, school cancelations or other actions taken to reduce the spread of the outbreak.

In this case, plaintiffs say The Cincinnati Company cannot even use the virus exemption defense, because it had no such exemption.

“Defendant did not exclude or limit coverage for losses from viruses in Plaintiff’s policies or those of the other Class members,” the lawsuit states. “The policy did not exclude pandemic coverage, communicable disease coverage or anything similar.”

With a growing number of complaints being filed in U.S. District Courts nationwide, several plaintiffs filed a motion to transfer on April 20, asking the U.S. JPML to centralize all coronavirus insurance coverage lawsuits before one judge in the Eastern District of Pennsylvania.

According to the motion, there are already about a dozen such COVID-19 business interruption insurance lawsuits filed nationwide, and it is estimated that hundreds, if not thousands, of similar complains will likely be filed in the coming months, as more small businesses are pushed to the brink only to find their insurance companies are not denying payments on policies they paid for.


Share Your Comments

I authorize the above comments be posted on this page*

Want your comments reviewed by a lawyer?

To have an attorney review your comments and contact you about a potential case, provide your contact information below. This will not be published.

NOTE: Providing information for review by an attorney does not form an attorney-client relationship.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

More Top Stories

BioZorb Lawsuit Alleges Breast Tissue Marker Failed, Requiring Surgical Removal
BioZorb Lawsuit Alleges Breast Tissue Marker Failed, Requiring Surgical Removal (Posted 2 days ago)

A BioZorb lawsuit has been filed by several breast cancer survivors after the BioZorb implants moved out of place and failed to dissolve int he body, requiring surgical removal.

Fairness Hearing For Philips CPAP Recall Medical Monitoring Settlement Set for October
Fairness Hearing For Philips CPAP Recall Medical Monitoring Settlement Set for October (Posted 2 days ago)

A U.S. District Court judge has scheduled a fairness hearing for October in order to determine whether final approval should be granted to a $25 million Philips CPAP recall settlement agreement, which would pay former users $25 million to pay for future medical monitoring needs.