Skip Navigation

Pressure Cooker Explosion Lawsuit Alleges Recalled Crock-Pot Caused Severe Burn Injuries

Pressure Cooker Explosion Lawsuit Alleges Recalled Crock-Pot Caused Severe Burn Injuries

A Maryland woman has filed a product liability lawsuit alleging she suffered severe burns and other injuries after scalding food was ejected from a Crock-Pot Express multicooker, when the pressure cooker safety features failed and allowed the lid to be removed while there was still intense pressure built up inside the device.

The complaint (PDF) was brought by Evelyn Thomas in the U.S. District Court for the District of Georgia on June 16, pursuing damages from Sunbeam Products Inc. and Newell Brands Inc. as the defendants.

Thomas claims the companies put profit over safety by continuing to sell the Crock-Pot pressure cooker, after receiving more than 100 similar reports of burn injuries and the device opening while still under pressure.

Pressure Cooker Explosion Risks

The Crock-Pot Express Multicooker is a consumer kitchen appliance that uses high pressure to rapidly cook food. Like other electric pressure cooker brands, it is designed with safety features intended to prevent the lid from opening while the device is pressurized.

However, in recent years, hundreds of burn injuries have been reported by consumers after electric pressure cookers have failed to keep the lids on during pressurization. The reports have impacted various major brands, including Crock-Pot, Instant Pot, Ninja and many others.

In the reports, consumers allege safety features failed on electric pressure cooker lids due to design defects of the devices. As a result, a number of pressure cooker injury lawsuits have been filed in recent years involving similar allegations due to the growing number of injuries that consumers have faced.

Pressure-Cooker-Eplosion-Lawsuit-Lawyer
Pressure-Cooker-Eplosion-Lawsuit-Lawyer

Crock-Pot Explosion Allegations

Thomas alleges she was using the Crock-Pot pressure cooker in July 2024 when she was able to remove the lid while the contents were still under pressure. 

Her claim indicates that despite safety features intended to prevent the lid from opening under those conditions, she was able to remove it, unaware the contents were still pressurized. This allowed scalding food and liquid to explode onto her body. The Crock-Pot pressure cooker is advertised as being designed with โ€œsafety in mindโ€ and includes safety sensors that are meant to keep the lid from opening while under pressure. The lawsuit alleges those safety features failed when Thomas used the device.

The problem is not new. Sunbeam issued a recall for more than 900,000 Crock-Pot multicookers in November 2020. The complaint indicates the recall was issued only after the company and federal regulators received nearly 120 reports of faulty lids opening during cooking, causing nearly 100 burn injuries ranging in severity from first- to third-degree burns.

Thomasโ€™s lawsuit alleges Sunbeam put profits over safety by continuing to sell the pressure cookers to consumers despite knowing about the faulty lid design. She argues the company failed to warn consumers of the serious risks posed by the defect and failed to issue a timely recall.

โ€œDefendants ignored and/or concealed their knowledge of these defects in their Pressure Cookers from the Plaintiff in this case, as well as the public in general, in order to continue generating a profit from the sale of said Pressure Cookers, demonstrating a callous, reckless, willful, depraved indifference to the health, safety and welfare of Plaintiff and consumers like her.โ€

Evelyn Thomas v. Sunbeam Products Inc. et al.

The complaint raises allegations of strict products liability, negligence, breach of implied warranty of fitness for a particular purpose and breach of implied warranty of merchantability. Thomas is seeking damages for bodily injuries, medical expenses, physical pain, mental anguish and diminished enjoyment of life.

Sign up for more legal news that could affect you or your family.

Martha Garcia
Written By: Martha Garcia

Health & Medical Research Writer

Martha Garcia is a health and medical research writer at AboutLawsuits.com with over 15 years of experience covering peer-reviewed studies and emerging public health risks. She previously led content strategy at The Blogsmith and contributes original reporting on drug safety, medical research, and health trends impacting consumers.



0 Comments


This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

Share Your Comments

This field is hidden when viewing the form
I authorize the above comments be posted on this page
Post Comment
Weekly Digest Opt-In

Want your comments reviewed by a lawyer?

To have an attorney review your comments and contact you about a potential case, provide your contact information below. This will not be published.

NOTE: Providing information for review by an attorney does not form an attorney-client relationship.

MORE TOP STORIES

Plaintiffs and defendants have submitted a joint schedule for a final pretrial conference before the second Bard PowerPort lawsuit bellwether trial over claims the port catheter is defectively designed.
Analysts expect wider use of breast reconstruction mesh through 2030, even as lawsuits raise questions about synthetic products, FDA approval and serious complications requiring additional surgery.

About the writer

Martha Garcia

Martha Garcia

Martha Garcia is a health and medical research writer at AboutLawsuits.com with over 15 years of experience covering peer-reviewed studies and emerging public health risks. She previously led content strategy at The Blogsmith and contributes original reporting on drug safety, medical research, and health trends impacting consumers.