Scope Infection Lawsuit Patients across the United States have filed medical scope infection lawsuits after contaminated endoscopes and duodenoscopes allegedly transmitted dangerous bacterial infections during procedures such as ERCP, colonoscopy, and other endoscopic treatments.
Spinal Cord Stimulator Lawsuit Spinal cord stimulator lawsuits allege that implanted pain devices malfunctioned, migrated, or caused nerve damage, often forcing patients to undergo revision or removal surgery.
Depo-Provera Lawsuit Depo-Provera lawsuits are being investigated for women who developed meningioma brain tumors after receiving Depo-Provera birth control shots, claiming that Pfizer failed to adequately disclose side effects.
Suboxone Tooth Decay Lawsuit Lawsuits are being pursued by users of Suboxone who experienced tooth loss, broken teeth or required dental extractions. Settlement benefits may be available.
Chlorpyrifos Parkinsonโs Disease Lawsuit Chlorpyrifos lawsuits are being investigated for individuals diagnosed with Parkinsonโs disease after direct, residential, occupational or Gulf War pesticide exposure.
Ozempic Lawsuit Lawyers are pursuing Ozempic lawsuits, Wegovy lawsuits and Mounjaro lawsuits over gastroparesis or stomach paralysis, which can leave users with long-term gastrointestinal side effects
Hair Relaxer Lawsuit Regular exposure to chemicals in hair relaxer may cause uterine cancer, ovarian cancer and other injuries. Women diagnosed with cancer may be eligible for settlement benefits.
Bard PowerPort Lawsuit Serious and life-threatening injuries have been linked to problems with Bard PowerPort. Lawsuits are now being pursued by individuals who suffered injuries from the implantable port catheter fracturing or migrating.
Nitrous Oxide Lawsuit Individuals who suffered harm, or families who lost a loved one after using nitrous oxide products may be eligible for financial compensation through a nitrous oxide lawsuit.
Breast Mesh Lawsuit Lawyers are investigating breast mesh lawsuits for women who suffered infections, pain, or implant failure from internal bra implants used in breast reconstruction surgery.
Self-Driving Car Regulatory Guidelines Provide Streamlined Processes, Fewer Barriers for Testing September 14, 2017 Russell Maas Add Your CommentsFederal highway safety officials have released a new guidance for automobile manufacturers regarding self-driving cars, promoting the testing and development of technology that is widely seen as a path to reduce the number of auto accidents and deaths each year.ย The U.S. Department of Transportation (DOT) and the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) released new federal guidelines for Automated Driving Systems (ADS) on September 12, providing recommendations for the automotive industry and States to follow while developing the evolving technologies used in self-driving vehicles.The guidance, A Vision for Safety 2.0, was released as a supportive effort to help automotive companies develop autonomous driving technologies that are designed to prevent human-error accidents such as crashes caused by lane departures and failure to brake, which make up the majority of auto accidents each year.Do You Know about…Spinal Cord Stimulator lawsuitsSpinal cord stimulator lawsuits are being investigated for individuals who suffered unnecessary shocks, burns or other problems, often resulting in the need for additional surgery to remove the SCS.Learn MoreSEE IF YOU QUALIFY FOR COMPENSATIONDo You Know AboutโฆSpinal Cord Stimulator lawsuitsSpinal cord stimulator lawsuits are being investigated for individuals who suffered unnecessary shocks, burns or other problems, often resulting in the need for additional surgery to remove the SCS.Learn MoreSEE IF YOU QUALIFY FOR COMPENSATIONThe prior Federal Automated Vehicle Policy was released in 2016, and the new guidance provides a framework that officials say offers a path toward the safe development of automated vehicles while encouraging new ideas that can develop safer technologies.โThe new Guidance supports further development of this important new technology, which has the potential to change the way we travel and how we deliver goods and services,โ U.S. Transportation Secretary Elaine L. Chao said in the press release. โThe safe deployment of ย automated vehicle technologies means we can look forward to a future with fewer traffic fatalities and increased mobility for all Americans.โChao said the framework of the guidance will help make the regulatory process in which the department puts forth more nimble, to help match the pace of private sector innovation, so that safety advancements are not held up from progress.Specifically, the guidance is aligned with the latest developments and industry terminology and clarifies the Federal and State roles moving forward with automated vehicle technology implementation.While setting the framework, the guidance also has revised unnecessary design elements from the safety self-assessment and clarifies that entities do not need to wait to test or deploy their automated driving systems.Automated driving systems are projected to save tens of thousands of lives annually, while reducing vehicle crash injuries and billions in medical costs accrued annually.Injury and fatality data from a National Safety Council (NSC) study earlier this year indicated more than 4.6 million roadway users were injured seriously enough to require medical attention in 2016, resulting in roughly 40,000 fatalities.The traffic related injuries and fatalities included all vehicle related accidents, as well as all pedestrian and bicycle collisions, which have been on a sharp increase over the last several years, according to the NHTSA.The NSC survey data indicates that traffic related accidents and injuries or all degrees cost society an estimated $432 billion in 2016 alone, making it one of the largest financial hits since 1921 when the NSC began issuing traffic fatality estimates.With a six percent increase in motor vehicles deaths in last year over 2015, and a 14% increase when compared to 2014, the need for increased driving safety technologies is apparent.The Vision for Safety 2.0 indicates an estimated 94% of automobile accidents are caused or contributed to by human error that could be preventable if the proper technology and systems were put in vehicles.Technologies that could prevent drivers from veering off of the road or into oncoming traffic due to looking at their cell phones could prevent tragedies on both parties involved in accidents.Furthermore, automated driving systems are anticipated to be a major advancement for those who are unable to drive, such as the elderly, disabled or ill, said Chao. Written by: Russell MaasManaging Editor & Senior Legal JournalistRussell Maas is a paralegal and the Managing Editor of AboutLawsuits.com, where he has reported on mass tort litigation, medical recalls, and consumer safety issues since 2010. He brings legal experience from one of the nationโs leading personal injury law firms and oversees the siteโs editorial strategy, including SEO and content development. Tags: Auto AccidentMore Lawsuit Stories Spinal Cord Stimulator Lawsuit Alleges Boston Scientific Device Failure Required Removal Surgery September 29, 2026 IVF Embryo Lawsuit Alleges Ovation Fertility PGT-A Testing Error Caused Loss September 29, 2026 DraftKings ‘Free Bet’ Promos Targeted Problem Gamblers Using AI: Report September 29, 2026 0 Comments X/TwitterThis field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.Share Your CommentsFirst Name*Last NameEmail* Shared Comments*This field is hidden when viewing the formI authorize the above comments be posted on this page Yes NoPost Comment I authorize the above comments be posted on this pageWeekly Digest Opt-In Yes, send me a weekly email with the latest lawsuits, recalls and warnings.Want your comments reviewed by a lawyer?To have an attorney review your comments and contact you about a potential case, provide your contact information below. This will not be published.Contact Phone #Alt Phone #Private CommentsNOTE: Providing information for review by an attorney does not form an attorney-client relationship.CAPTCHAGA SourceGA CampaignGA MediumGA ContentGA TermΔ MORE TOP STORIES Spinal Cord Stimulator Lawsuit Alleges Boston Scientific Device Failure Required Removal Surgery (Posted: today)A Texas woman’s Boston Scientific SCS implant lawsuit claims she spent several years with a broken device in her back, but did not remove it because the company’s sales representatives said it just needed reprogramming.MORE ABOUT: SPINAL CORD STIMULATOR LAWSUITNevro SCS Implant Lawsuit Alleges Sales Rep Programming Led to Permanent Nerve Damage (09/21/2026)Boston Scientific Spine Stimulator Lawsuit Filed Over Numbness, Incontinence, Erectile Dysfunction (09/16/2026)Abbott Spinal Cord Stimulator Explant Surgery Required After Device Failure: Lawsuit (09/10/2026) First Hair Relaxer Cancer Lawsuit Set for Bellwether Trial on Sept. 7, 2027 (Posted: yesterday)A federal judge has scheduled the first hair relaxer cancer lawsuit bellwether trial for September 7, 2027.MORE ABOUT: HAIR RELAXER LAWSUITL’Oreal Faces State AG Lawsuit Over Cancer Risks From Hair Relaxers (09/15/2026)L’Oreal Execs To Face More Questions Over Dark and Lovely, Hair Relaxer Cancer Risks (06/29/2026)Group of 38 Hair Relaxer Cancer Lawyers Reappointed to MDL Leadership Roles (05/27/2026) Online Gambling Addiction Lawsuit Alleges DraftKings App Fueled Compulsive Sports Betting (Posted: 4 days ago)DraftKings faces an online gambling addiction lawsuit claiming a man wagered millions due to targeted promotions that focused on signs of compulsive behavior and exploited them.MORE ABOUT: SPORTS BETTING ADDICTION LAWSUITDraftKings ‘Free Bet’ Promos Targeted Problem Gamblers Using AI: Report (09/29/2026)DraftKings, FanDuel Lawsuit Alleges VIP Managers Fueled More Than $130K in Gambling Losses (09/18/2026)DraftKings Lawsuit Indicates ‘Event Contracts’ Are Nothing More Than Sports Bets (09/11/2026)
Spinal Cord Stimulator Lawsuit Alleges Boston Scientific Device Failure Required Removal Surgery September 29, 2026
Spinal Cord Stimulator Lawsuit Alleges Boston Scientific Device Failure Required Removal Surgery (Posted: today)A Texas woman’s Boston Scientific SCS implant lawsuit claims she spent several years with a broken device in her back, but did not remove it because the company’s sales representatives said it just needed reprogramming.MORE ABOUT: SPINAL CORD STIMULATOR LAWSUITNevro SCS Implant Lawsuit Alleges Sales Rep Programming Led to Permanent Nerve Damage (09/21/2026)Boston Scientific Spine Stimulator Lawsuit Filed Over Numbness, Incontinence, Erectile Dysfunction (09/16/2026)Abbott Spinal Cord Stimulator Explant Surgery Required After Device Failure: Lawsuit (09/10/2026)
First Hair Relaxer Cancer Lawsuit Set for Bellwether Trial on Sept. 7, 2027 (Posted: yesterday)A federal judge has scheduled the first hair relaxer cancer lawsuit bellwether trial for September 7, 2027.MORE ABOUT: HAIR RELAXER LAWSUITL’Oreal Faces State AG Lawsuit Over Cancer Risks From Hair Relaxers (09/15/2026)L’Oreal Execs To Face More Questions Over Dark and Lovely, Hair Relaxer Cancer Risks (06/29/2026)Group of 38 Hair Relaxer Cancer Lawyers Reappointed to MDL Leadership Roles (05/27/2026)
Online Gambling Addiction Lawsuit Alleges DraftKings App Fueled Compulsive Sports Betting (Posted: 4 days ago)DraftKings faces an online gambling addiction lawsuit claiming a man wagered millions due to targeted promotions that focused on signs of compulsive behavior and exploited them.MORE ABOUT: SPORTS BETTING ADDICTION LAWSUITDraftKings ‘Free Bet’ Promos Targeted Problem Gamblers Using AI: Report (09/29/2026)DraftKings, FanDuel Lawsuit Alleges VIP Managers Fueled More Than $130K in Gambling Losses (09/18/2026)DraftKings Lawsuit Indicates ‘Event Contracts’ Are Nothing More Than Sports Bets (09/11/2026)