Scope Infection Lawsuit Patients across the United States have filed medical scope infection lawsuits after contaminated endoscopes and duodenoscopes allegedly transmitted dangerous bacterial infections during procedures such as ERCP, colonoscopy, and other endoscopic treatments.
Spinal Cord Stimulator Lawsuit Spinal cord stimulator lawsuits allege that implanted pain devices malfunctioned, migrated, or caused nerve damage, often forcing patients to undergo revision or removal surgery.
Depo-Provera Lawsuit Depo-Provera lawsuits are being investigated for women who developed meningioma brain tumors after receiving Depo-Provera birth control shots, claiming that Pfizer failed to adequately disclose side effects.
Chlorpyrifos Parkinsonโs Disease Lawsuit Chlorpyrifos lawsuits are being investigated for individuals diagnosed with Parkinsonโs disease after direct, residential, occupational or Gulf War pesticide exposure.
Ozempic Lawsuit Lawyers are pursuing Ozempic lawsuits, Wegovy lawsuits and Mounjaro lawsuits over gastroparesis or stomach paralysis, which can leave users with long-term gastrointestinal side effects
Suboxone Tooth Decay Lawsuit Lawsuits are being pursued by users of Suboxone who experienced tooth loss, broken teeth or required dental extractions. Settlement benefits may be available.
Hair Relaxer Lawsuit Regular exposure to chemicals in hair relaxer may cause uterine cancer, ovarian cancer and other injuries. Women diagnosed with cancer may be eligible for settlement benefits.
Nitrous Oxide Lawsuit Individuals who suffered harm, or families who lost a loved one after using nitrous oxide products may be eligible for financial compensation through a nitrous oxide lawsuit.
Breast Mesh Lawsuit Lawyers are investigating breast mesh lawsuits for women who suffered infections, pain, or implant failure from internal bra implants used in breast reconstruction surgery.
Bard PowerPort Lawsuit Serious and life-threatening injuries have been linked to problems with Bard PowerPort. Lawsuits are now being pursued by individuals who suffered injuries from the implantable port catheter fracturing or migrating.
Order Issued Regarding Service of Ocella Lawsuits in Yasmin Litigation January 14, 2013 Austin Kirk Add Your CommentsThe federal judge presiding over the Yaz and Yasmin litigation has issued an agreed order regarding the service of process in lawsuits over Ocella birth control, which is a generic version of Yasmin that is distributed by Barr Laboratories, Inc. and Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc.A growing number of Ocella lawsuits have been centralized before U.S. District Judge David R. Herndon in the federal multidistrict litigation (MDL) established for all product liability lawsuits over side effects of Yaz, Yasmin and other drospirenone-based oral birth control pills.The complaints involves similar allegations that drospirenone increase the risk of blood clot when compared to some older oral birth control pills, claiming that the manufacturers failed to adequately warn about the risk of users suffering a pulmonary embolism, deep vein thrombosis, stroke or other injury.Do You Know about…Spinal Cord Stimulator lawsuitsSpinal cord stimulator lawsuits are being investigated for individuals who suffered unnecessary shocks, burns or other problems, often resulting in the need for additional surgery to remove the SCS.Learn MoreSEE IF YOU QUALIFY FOR COMPENSATIONDo You Know AboutโฆSpinal Cord Stimulator lawsuitsSpinal cord stimulator lawsuits are being investigated for individuals who suffered unnecessary shocks, burns or other problems, often resulting in the need for additional surgery to remove the SCS.Learn MoreSEE IF YOU QUALIFY FOR COMPENSATIONBayer is named as a defendant in all of the lawsuits, as they not only manufacture and sell the brand name Yaz and Yasmin pills, but also manufacture Ocella pills, which are then distributed by Barr and Teva as generic Yasmin equivalents under a 2008 agreement between the companies.According to Judge Herndon, Barr and Teva have agreed to service of process under the terms outlined in the order, which require the complaint and summons to be sent to designated representatives by certified mail within the next 90 days for any previously filed cases, and within 60 days after any future lawsuits are docketed in the Yaz/Yasmin MDL.Some lawsuits have named other Barr and Teva entities, including Teva Pharmaceutical Industries, Ltd. and Barr Pharmaceuticals, LLC, as defendants, and Judge Herndon has ordered that these entities do not have to file any responsive pleadings at this time, to avoid issues concerning the personal jurisdiction over those entities. This was permitted based on indications that these parent companies had no role in the distribution of Ocella pills.Nearly 10,000 Yaz lawsuits and Yasmin lawsuits have been consolidated before Judge Herndon for coordinated pretrial proceedings in the federal MDL, with additional claims pending in various state courts as well.Bayer has already reached Yaz and Yasmin settlement agreements in thousands of cases involving women who claim that they suffered a pulmonary embolism or deep vein thrombosis injury after taking the brand-name birth control pills.Judge Herndon has been instrumental in promoting the efficient conduct of the litigation and guiding the parties towards early settlement agreements, before the first case has even reached a jury.In another order (PDF) issued earlier this month, Judge Herndon stated that plaintiffs could file claims directly with the Southern District of Illinois, regardless of the plaintiff’s home district, and that the defendants would not challenge the venue where those cases were filed or try to have them moved to another court. Tags: Barr Laboratories, Bayer, Birth Control, Birth Control Pill, Deep Vein Thrombosis, Gallbladder, Gianvi, Ocella, Pulmonary Embolism, Stroke, Teva Pharmaceuticals, Yasmin, YazMore Lawsuit Stories Dupixent Lymphoma Lawsuit Alleges Atopic Dermatitis Drug Led to Mycosis Fungoides Diagnosis August 20, 2026 Indoor Fire Pit Lawsuit Indicates Flame Jet Set User’s Body on Fire August 20, 2026 Missouri Appeals Court Orders New Trial for Similac, Enfamil NEC Lawsuit August 20, 2026 0 Comments EmailThis field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.Share Your CommentsFirst Name*Last NameEmail* Shared Comments*This field is hidden when viewing the formI authorize the above comments be posted on this page Yes NoPost Comment I authorize the above comments be posted on this pageWeekly Digest Opt-In Yes, send me a weekly email with the latest lawsuits, recalls and warnings.Want your comments reviewed by a lawyer?To have an attorney review your comments and contact you about a potential case, provide your contact information below. This will not be published.Contact Phone #Alt Phone #Private CommentsNOTE: Providing information for review by an attorney does not form an attorney-client relationship.CAPTCHAGA SourceGA CampaignGA MediumGA ContentGA TermΔ MORE TOP STORIES Dupixent Lymphoma Lawsuit Alleges Atopic Dermatitis Drug Led to Mycosis Fungoides Diagnosis (Posted: today)A California woman’s Dupixent lymphoma lawsuit claims the manufacturers knew of the eczema drug’s cancer risks, but refused to inform doctors and patients.MORE ABOUT: DUPIXENT LAWSUITDupixent CTCL Studies Highlighted Cancer Risks For Years, Lawsuit Alleges (08/11/2026)CTCL Lawsuit Alleges Diagnosis Came After Less Than a Year of Dupixent Use (07/29/2026)Lawsuit Alleges Dupixent Caused Mycosis Fungoides Diagnosis (07/21/2026) FanDuel Addiction Lawsuit Alleges Targeted Advertising Caused Substantial Gambling Losses (Posted: yesterday)A FanDuel addiction lawsuit claims a Pennsylvania man wagered massive amounts of money after being subjected to a tailored promotional campaign designed to exploit his gambling habits.MORE ABOUT: SPORTS BETTING ADDICTION LAWSUITDraftKings Predictions Lawsuit Seeks Refunds for Illegal Sports Betting Losses (08/11/2026)Class Action Lawsuit Claims DraftKings Is Dodging State Gambling Laws (07/31/2026)Lawsuit Claims FanDuel, DraftKings Caused Compulsive Gambling, Addiction and Financial Losses (07/24/2026) Boston Scientific Stimulator Lawsuit Alleges Spine Implant Caused Nerve Damage, Shocks (Posted: 2 days ago)A spinal cord stimulator lawsuit from a Kentucky man claims his Boston Scientific device was defectively designed, leaving him with permanent nerve damage and wire fragments fused into his bones.MORE ABOUT: SPINAL CORD STIMULATOR LAWSUITNevro Stimulator Lawsuit MDL Request Opposed by Manufacturer (08/14/2026)Abbott Continues to Oppose Spinal Cord Stimulator Lawsuit MDL, Despite Mounting Claims (08/10/2026)Lawsuit Over Spinal Cord Stimulator Removal Claims Device Caused Numbness, Incontinence (08/06/2026)
Dupixent Lymphoma Lawsuit Alleges Atopic Dermatitis Drug Led to Mycosis Fungoides Diagnosis August 20, 2026
Dupixent Lymphoma Lawsuit Alleges Atopic Dermatitis Drug Led to Mycosis Fungoides Diagnosis (Posted: today)A California woman’s Dupixent lymphoma lawsuit claims the manufacturers knew of the eczema drug’s cancer risks, but refused to inform doctors and patients.MORE ABOUT: DUPIXENT LAWSUITDupixent CTCL Studies Highlighted Cancer Risks For Years, Lawsuit Alleges (08/11/2026)CTCL Lawsuit Alleges Diagnosis Came After Less Than a Year of Dupixent Use (07/29/2026)Lawsuit Alleges Dupixent Caused Mycosis Fungoides Diagnosis (07/21/2026)
FanDuel Addiction Lawsuit Alleges Targeted Advertising Caused Substantial Gambling Losses (Posted: yesterday)A FanDuel addiction lawsuit claims a Pennsylvania man wagered massive amounts of money after being subjected to a tailored promotional campaign designed to exploit his gambling habits.MORE ABOUT: SPORTS BETTING ADDICTION LAWSUITDraftKings Predictions Lawsuit Seeks Refunds for Illegal Sports Betting Losses (08/11/2026)Class Action Lawsuit Claims DraftKings Is Dodging State Gambling Laws (07/31/2026)Lawsuit Claims FanDuel, DraftKings Caused Compulsive Gambling, Addiction and Financial Losses (07/24/2026)
Boston Scientific Stimulator Lawsuit Alleges Spine Implant Caused Nerve Damage, Shocks (Posted: 2 days ago)A spinal cord stimulator lawsuit from a Kentucky man claims his Boston Scientific device was defectively designed, leaving him with permanent nerve damage and wire fragments fused into his bones.MORE ABOUT: SPINAL CORD STIMULATOR LAWSUITNevro Stimulator Lawsuit MDL Request Opposed by Manufacturer (08/14/2026)Abbott Continues to Oppose Spinal Cord Stimulator Lawsuit MDL, Despite Mounting Claims (08/10/2026)Lawsuit Over Spinal Cord Stimulator Removal Claims Device Caused Numbness, Incontinence (08/06/2026)