Servpro Notus Air Mover Recall Issued Due to Fire Hazard

About 24,000 Servpro Notus air movers have been recalled after reportedly overheating and causing fires. 

The Servpro Notus air mover recall was announced by the U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission (CPSC) on June 26, after Servpro received at least four reports of the blowers overheating.

Three of those overheated air movers caused property damage, with one of the reports involving a house fire in San Diego, California that resulted in $475,000 in damage. The recall notice did not mention any injuries.

Did You Know?

Change Healthcare Data Breach Impacts Millions of Customers

A massive Change Healthcare data breach exposed the names, social security numbers, medical and personal information of potentially 100 million Americans, which have now been released on the dark web. Lawsuits are being pursued to obtain financial compensation.

Learn More

The CPSC has determined that the air mover/blowers have a problem with their internal electrical capacitor, which can overheat and fail. The commission has deemed the blowers to be a fire hazard.

The recall affects Servpro Notus commercial air movers/blowers. They are covered in green plastic with a 25-foot yellow electrical cord. The blowers themselves are about 18 inches tall, wide and deep. They are used to dry flooring, walls and furniture inside buildings.

The blowers were manufactured by EDIC of Los Angeles, California, and sold to Servpro franchises nationwide from April 2004 through August 2010 for between $200 and $230.

The CPSC recommends that those who have purchased the air movers stop using them immediately and contact Servpro for a free repair kit. Servpro is in the process of contacting any franchises that bought the air movers directly. Purchasers with questions can contact Carey Cooper at Servpro by calling (800) 543-5362, or can send an email to AirMoverRecall@Klinedinstlaw.com.

0 Comments

Share Your Comments

I authorize the above comments be posted on this page*

Want your comments reviewed by a lawyer?

To have an attorney review your comments and contact you about a potential case, provide your contact information below. This will not be published.

NOTE: Providing information for review by an attorney does not form an attorney-client relationship.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

More Top Stories

Lawyers Propose MDL Trial Dates for Baby Formula NEC Lawsuit Starting in May 2025
Lawyers Propose MDL Trial Dates for Baby Formula NEC Lawsuit Starting in May 2025 (Posted yesterday)

A series of four bellwether claims in the baby formula NEC lawsuit MDL will be ready to go before a federal juries in May 2025, August 2025, November 2025 and February 2026 according to a proposed trial schedule agreed upon by both plaintiffs and defendants.

AngioDynamics Port Catheter Lawsuit MDL Established in Southern District of California
AngioDynamics Port Catheter Lawsuit MDL Established in Southern District of California (Posted 2 days ago)

U.S. JPML has transferred all AngioDynamics port catheter lawsuits to the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of California, for coordinated discovery and pretrial proceedings as part of a federal MDL (multidistrict litigation).