Scope Infection Lawsuit Patients across the United States have filed medical scope infection lawsuits after contaminated endoscopes and duodenoscopes allegedly transmitted dangerous bacterial infections during procedures such as ERCP, colonoscopy, and other endoscopic treatments.
Spinal Cord Stimulator Lawsuit Spinal cord stimulator lawsuits allege that implanted pain devices malfunctioned, migrated, or caused nerve damage, often forcing patients to undergo revision or removal surgery.
Depo-Provera Lawsuit Depo-Provera lawsuits are being investigated for women who developed meningioma brain tumors after receiving Depo-Provera birth control shots, claiming that Pfizer failed to adequately disclose side effects.
Suboxone Tooth Decay Lawsuit Lawsuits are being pursued by users of Suboxone who experienced tooth loss, broken teeth or required dental extractions. Settlement benefits may be available.
Chlorpyrifos Parkinsonโs Disease Lawsuit Chlorpyrifos lawsuits are being investigated for individuals diagnosed with Parkinsonโs disease after direct, residential, occupational or Gulf War pesticide exposure.
Ozempic Lawsuit Lawyers are pursuing Ozempic lawsuits, Wegovy lawsuits and Mounjaro lawsuits over gastroparesis or stomach paralysis, which can leave users with long-term gastrointestinal side effects
Hair Relaxer Lawsuit Regular exposure to chemicals in hair relaxer may cause uterine cancer, ovarian cancer and other injuries. Women diagnosed with cancer may be eligible for settlement benefits.
Bard PowerPort Lawsuit Serious and life-threatening injuries have been linked to problems with Bard PowerPort. Lawsuits are now being pursued by individuals who suffered injuries from the implantable port catheter fracturing or migrating.
Nitrous Oxide Lawsuit Individuals who suffered harm, or families who lost a loved one after using nitrous oxide products may be eligible for financial compensation through a nitrous oxide lawsuit.
Breast Mesh Lawsuit Lawyers are investigating breast mesh lawsuits for women who suffered infections, pain, or implant failure from internal bra implants used in breast reconstruction surgery.
Class Action Lawsuit Alleges Apple, Samsung Smartphone Radiation Exceeds Safety Standards August 27, 2019 Irvin Jackson Add Your CommentsApple and Samsung face a class action lawsuit that indicates popular smartphones widely used throughout the U.S. cause consumers to face radiofrequency (RF) exposure at levels that exceed the maximum allowable limits, potentially posing a cancer risk.The complaint (PDF) was filed in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California on August 23, by eleven different individuals, who seek class action status to pursue damages from Apple, Inc. and Samsung Electronics.The plaintiffs point to a recent report by the Chicago Tribune, which tested a number of popular smartphone models, discovering some exceeded federal RF limits by as much as 500%, far higher than the levels manufacturers reported to federal regulators.Do You Know about…Spinal Cord Stimulator lawsuitsSpinal cord stimulator lawsuits are being investigated for individuals who suffered unnecessary shocks, burns or other problems, often resulting in the need for additional surgery to remove the SCS.Learn MoreSEE IF YOU QUALIFY FOR COMPENSATIONDo You Know AboutโฆSpinal Cord Stimulator lawsuitsSpinal cord stimulator lawsuits are being investigated for individuals who suffered unnecessary shocks, burns or other problems, often resulting in the need for additional surgery to remove the SCS.Learn MoreSEE IF YOU QUALIFY FOR COMPENSATIONThe tests were conducted according to federal guidelines at an independent, accredited lab. In one series of tests, the researchers tested four different, brand new, iPhone 7s at full power. All exceeded federal safety limits; sometimes at twice the levels Apple reported to the Federal Communications Commission.In total, the Chicago Tribune tested 11 models of cell phones from four different companies.In response to the report, Apple claimed the testing was done improperly, but would not say what was done wrong, according to the Tribune, so it had the cellphones tested yet again, in strict accordance to FCC standards. The results still showed that the phones exceeded federal radiation standards.Following that testing, Apple officials refused to be interviewed and did not respond to questions submitted in writing.โNumerous recent scientific publications, supported by hundreds of scientists worldwide, have shown that RF radiation exposure affects living organisms at levels well below most international and national guidelines. Effects include increased cancer risk, cellular stress, increase in harmful free radicals, genetic damages, structural and functional changes of the reproductive system, learning and memory deficits, neurological disorders, and negative impacts on general well-being in humans,โ the lawsuit states. โThus, Defendantsโ design, manufacture, and sale of smartphones that far exceed federal guidelines exacerbates the health risks to Plaintiffs and the Classes.โThe lawsuit claims all those who used Apple and Samsung smartphones which exceeded federal safety limits for RF exposure are at an increased risk of health problems. The lawsuit seeks class action for all persons who purchased an iPhone 7, 8, or X, or a Samsung Galaxy S8, S9, or J3; all of which failed the Chicago Tribuneโs testing.They are calling for the companies to pay for medical monitoring and restitution for those who purchased those models. Written by: Irvin JacksonSenior Legal Journalist & Contributing EditorIrvin Jackson is a senior investigative reporter at AboutLawsuits.com with more than 30 years of experience covering mass tort litigation, environmental policy, and consumer safety. He previously served as Associate Editor at Inside the EPA and contributes original reporting on product liability lawsuits, regulatory failures, and nationwide litigation trends. Tags: Apple, Class Action Lawsuit, Radiation, Radiation Exposure, Samsung, SmartphoneMore Lawsuit Stories Abbott and Nevro Spinal Cord Stimulator Lawsuits Centralized in New Federal MDLs October 5, 2026 GERD Implant Lawsuit Alleges Defective LINX Failed After Surgery October 5, 2026 Roundup Cancer Lawsuit Trial Underway in Missouri Court October 5, 2026 3 Comments Donald March 31, 2022 I have an S8 and a S9 on my accounts. Charles September 12, 2019 I’m EMF sensitive and had to move to a remote area to avoid cell towers, smart meters and cell phones. This is the first I’ve ever heard of lawyers taking this on. No surprise a ‘cohen’ is the lead plantiff. People should not join this lawsuit. They will get short changed. Instead file an individual suit. I’ve been looking to sue these companies for quite some time. No one would take it on. Maritza September 9, 2019 I have an I phone 8+ did have an iPhone 7+ been using the for years . EmailThis field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.Share Your CommentsFirst Name*Last NameEmail* Shared Comments*This field is hidden when viewing the formI authorize the above comments be posted on this page Yes NoPost Comment I authorize the above comments be posted on this pageWeekly Digest Opt-In Yes, send me a weekly email with the latest lawsuits, recalls and warnings.Want your comments reviewed by a lawyer?To have an attorney review your comments and contact you about a potential case, provide your contact information below. This will not be published.Contact Phone #Alt Phone #Private CommentsNOTE: Providing information for review by an attorney does not form an attorney-client relationship.CAPTCHAGA SourceGA CampaignGA MediumGA ContentGA TermΔ MORE TOP STORIES Abbott and Nevro Spinal Cord Stimulator Lawsuits Centralized in New Federal MDLs (Posted: today)Federally filed lawsuits against Abbott Laboratories and Nevro over alleged spinal cord stimulator injuries have been consolidated into two separate multidistrict litigations in California and Illinois.MORE ABOUT: SPINAL CORD STIMULATOR LAWSUITSpinal Cord Stimulator Lawsuit Alleges Boston Scientific Device Failure Required Removal Surgery (09/29/2026)Nevro SCS Implant Lawsuit Alleges Sales Rep Programming Led to Permanent Nerve Damage (09/21/2026)Boston Scientific Spine Stimulator Lawsuit Filed Over Numbness, Incontinence, Erectile Dysfunction (09/16/2026) Judge Clears Bard PowerPort Lawsuit for Trial, Rejecting Motion for Summary Judgment (Posted: 3 days ago)A U.S. District Judge refused to dismiss a Bard PowerPort lawsuit just two weeks before it is supposed to go to trial, saying the manufacturer will have to convince a jury with their arguments and not him.MORE ABOUT: BARD POWERPORT LAWSUITBard PowerPort Infection Lawsuit Set for Third Bellwether Trial to Begin Oct. 13 (09/14/2026)Jury Awards $40M Port Catheter Lawsuit Payout in Bard PowerPort Bellwether Trial (09/09/2026)Nearly 4,000 Bard PowerPort Lawsuits Are Awaiting Outcome of Upcoming Bellwether Trials (08/12/2026) Dupixent Lawyers Seek Leadership Positions in MDL Over Cancer Risks (Posted: 4 days ago)Plaintiffs propose that about a dozen attorneys be appointed to leadership positions in the growing Dupixent cancer litigation.MORE ABOUT: DUPIXENT LAWSUITDupixent Side Effects Lawsuit Alleges Drug Caused Cutaneous T-Cell Lymphoma (09/24/2026)Dupixent Side Effects Caused CTCL, Tumors, Lawsuit Alleges (09/10/2026)Dupixent Lymphoma Lawsuit Alleges Atopic Dermatitis Drug Led to Mycosis Fungoides Diagnosis (08/20/2026)
Abbott and Nevro Spinal Cord Stimulator Lawsuits Centralized in New Federal MDLs (Posted: today)Federally filed lawsuits against Abbott Laboratories and Nevro over alleged spinal cord stimulator injuries have been consolidated into two separate multidistrict litigations in California and Illinois.MORE ABOUT: SPINAL CORD STIMULATOR LAWSUITSpinal Cord Stimulator Lawsuit Alleges Boston Scientific Device Failure Required Removal Surgery (09/29/2026)Nevro SCS Implant Lawsuit Alleges Sales Rep Programming Led to Permanent Nerve Damage (09/21/2026)Boston Scientific Spine Stimulator Lawsuit Filed Over Numbness, Incontinence, Erectile Dysfunction (09/16/2026)
Judge Clears Bard PowerPort Lawsuit for Trial, Rejecting Motion for Summary Judgment (Posted: 3 days ago)A U.S. District Judge refused to dismiss a Bard PowerPort lawsuit just two weeks before it is supposed to go to trial, saying the manufacturer will have to convince a jury with their arguments and not him.MORE ABOUT: BARD POWERPORT LAWSUITBard PowerPort Infection Lawsuit Set for Third Bellwether Trial to Begin Oct. 13 (09/14/2026)Jury Awards $40M Port Catheter Lawsuit Payout in Bard PowerPort Bellwether Trial (09/09/2026)Nearly 4,000 Bard PowerPort Lawsuits Are Awaiting Outcome of Upcoming Bellwether Trials (08/12/2026)
Dupixent Lawyers Seek Leadership Positions in MDL Over Cancer Risks (Posted: 4 days ago)Plaintiffs propose that about a dozen attorneys be appointed to leadership positions in the growing Dupixent cancer litigation.MORE ABOUT: DUPIXENT LAWSUITDupixent Side Effects Lawsuit Alleges Drug Caused Cutaneous T-Cell Lymphoma (09/24/2026)Dupixent Side Effects Caused CTCL, Tumors, Lawsuit Alleges (09/10/2026)Dupixent Lymphoma Lawsuit Alleges Atopic Dermatitis Drug Led to Mycosis Fungoides Diagnosis (08/20/2026)