Sriracha Plant in Irwindale, California Linked to Health Complaints: Lawsuit

|

Amid reports of residents suffering headaches, burning eyes and other injuries near a Sriracha hot sauce plant in Irwindale, California, a judge has ordered a halt in production to address odors emanating from the factory.

The City of Irwindale filed a lawsuit against the Huy Fong Foods Sriracha plant on Monday in Los Angeles County Superior Court, calling odors from the plant a public nuisance.

Although the judge indicated that there is a lack of credible evidence at this time linking the Srirach plant to injuries, production has been stopped until a solution can be found to reduce or eliminate odors coming from the facility.

Sports-Betting-Addiction-Lawsuits
Sports-Betting-Addiction-Lawsuits

City officials say they have received numerous calls from city residents about the smell from the factory, which produces extremely powerful hot chili sauce. Despite the lawsuit, city officials say they hope to work with the factory to resolve the problems.

The owner of the $40 million, 650,000 square foot factory is David Tran, who has said he expects to outgrow the facility by 2017 as sriracha hot sauce rides a wave of growing national popularity. The factory just opened this summer. The company sold 20 million bottles of Sriracha last year alone.

The lawsuit comes on the heels of the first Sriracha Festival, which was held in Los Angeles this weekend and was attended by more than 800 people.

Since production began at the Sriracha plant in California, Irwindale city residents have complained that the smell is so powerful that it causes eyes to burn, headaches and has forced many to move outdoor activities indoors.

Plant officials say they have contacted the Air Quality Management District, which has recommended a new air filtration system be installed to combat the problem.

Written by: Irvin Jackson

Senior Legal Journalist & Contributing Editor

Irvin Jackson is a senior investigative reporter at AboutLawsuits.com with more than 30 years of experience covering mass tort litigation, environmental policy, and consumer safety. He previously served as Associate Editor at Inside the EPA and contributes original reporting on product liability lawsuits, regulatory failures, and nationwide litigation trends.

Image Credit: |



0 Comments


This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

Share Your Comments

This field is hidden when viewing the form
I authorize the above comments be posted on this page
Post Comment
Weekly Digest Opt-In

Want your comments reviewed by a lawyer?

To have an attorney review your comments and contact you about a potential case, provide your contact information below. This will not be published.

NOTE: Providing information for review by an attorney does not form an attorney-client relationship.

MORE TOP STORIES

Parties involved in a Dupixent T-cell lymphoma wrongful death lawsuit will participate in an initial status conference in early December, to map out how the litigation will move forward.
A group of plaintiffs are asking a panel of federal judges to consolidate all Lyft lawsuits involving driver sexual assaults against passengers before one judge as part of a Lyft MDL.
Federal regulators warned years ago that mesh implants were never approved for use in breast surgery, yet manufacturers continued marketing them as internal bra devices for reconstruction and cosmetic augmentation.