Scope Infection Lawsuit Patients across the United States have filed medical scope infection lawsuits after contaminated endoscopes and duodenoscopes allegedly transmitted dangerous bacterial infections during procedures such as ERCP, colonoscopy, and other endoscopic treatments.
Spinal Cord Stimulator Lawsuit Spinal cord stimulator lawsuits allege that implanted pain devices malfunctioned, migrated, or caused nerve damage, often forcing patients to undergo revision or removal surgery.
Chlorpyrifos Parkinson’s Disease Lawsuit Chlorpyrifos lawsuits are being investigated for individuals diagnosed with Parkinson’s disease after direct, residential, occupational or Gulf War pesticide exposure.
Ozempic Lawsuit Lawyers are pursuing Ozempic lawsuits, Wegovy lawsuits and Mounjaro lawsuits over gastroparesis or stomach paralysis, which can leave users with long-term gastrointestinal side effects
Suboxone Tooth Decay Lawsuit Lawsuits are being pursued by users of Suboxone who experienced tooth loss, broken teeth or required dental extractions. Settlement benefits may be available.
Depo-Provera Lawsuit Depo-Provera lawsuits are being investigated for women who developed meningioma brain tumors after receiving Depo-Provera birth control shots, claiming that Pfizer failed to adequately disclose side effects.
Hair Relaxer Lawsuit Regular exposure to chemicals in hair relaxer may cause uterine cancer, ovarian cancer and other injuries. Women diagnosed with cancer may be eligible for settlement benefits.
Nitrous Oxide Lawsuit Individuals who suffered harm, or families who lost a loved one after using nitrous oxide products may be eligible for financial compensation through a nitrous oxide lawsuit.
Breast Mesh Lawsuit Lawyers are investigating breast mesh lawsuits for women who suffered infections, pain, or implant failure from internal bra implants used in breast reconstruction surgery.
Bard PowerPort Lawsuit Serious and life-threatening injuries have been linked to problems with Bard PowerPort. Lawsuits are now being pursued by individuals who suffered injuries from the implantable port catheter fracturing or migrating.
St. Jude Medical To Pay $16M to End Defibrillator Kickback Probe January 25, 2011 Staff Writers Add Your CommentsU.S. prosecutors say that St. Jude Medical paid doctors as much as $2,000 per patient to convince them to have the company’s pacemakers and defibrillators implanted, and the company has agreed to pay $16 million to settle the illegal kickback allegations. The U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) announced the St. Jude settlement agreement on January 20.According to the DOJ’s claims, St. Jude used three post-market studies and a medical device registry as cover for payments to doctors to entice them to implant their heart devices in patients. The company solicited physicians to participate in the studies to get them to stop using competitor products and to continue to implant their patients with St. Jude-manufactured devices, including pacemakers and implantable cardioverter defibrillators (ICDs), the DOJ alleged.Do You Know about…Spinal Cord Stimulator lawsuitsSpinal cord stimulator lawsuits are being investigated for individuals who suffered unnecessary shocks, burns or other problems, often resulting in the need for additional surgery to remove the SCS.Learn MoreSEE IF YOU QUALIFY FOR COMPENSATIONDo You Know About…Spinal Cord Stimulator lawsuitsSpinal cord stimulator lawsuits are being investigated for individuals who suffered unnecessary shocks, burns or other problems, often resulting in the need for additional surgery to remove the SCS.Learn MoreSEE IF YOU QUALIFY FOR COMPENSATIONIn a press release issued the same day the settlement was announced, St. Jude claimed that the post-market studies and registries were legitimate clinical studies used to gather important scientific data. The company said that the settlement is not an admission of guilt and that it agreed to the terms to avoid the cost of lengthy and expensive litigation.The probe came as the result of a whistleblower lawsuit filed by Charles Donigian, who will receive a $2.64 million share of the settlement.Under the qui tam provision of the False Claims Act, whistleblowers who report a false claim against the government may be entitled to receive a portion of any money that the government recovers from the offenders. In return, the whistleblower must be the first to bring the case to the government’s attention, and must not publicize the claim until the DOJ decides to prosecute the claim.The St. Jude whistleblower settlement is the second settlement this month involving an implantable defibrillator medical device manufacturer. Last week, a federal judge accepted a guilty plea and $296 million settlement from Guidant over claims that it tried to cover up problems with defective ICDs. The company also agreed to a three-year probation sentence which will come with increased regulatory scrutiny into its devices and practices. Tags: Defibrillator, ICD, Medical Device, Qui Tam, St. Jude, Whistleblower Image Credit: |More Lawsuit Stories Dupixent CTCL Studies Highlighted Cancer Risks For Years, Lawsuit Alleges August 11, 2026 Enfamil Necrotizing Enterocolitis Lawsuit Set for Trial to Begin This Week August 11, 2026 Gree Dehumidifier Lawsuit Alleges Defective Appliance Caused House Fire August 11, 2026 4 Comments LATONYA December 12, 2011 HAVE ANY ONE HEARD ABOUT THE ST.JUDE DEFIBATTOR IMPLANT LAWSUIT AOR IS IT LOST FORVER… Maurice July 29, 2011 I had a St. Jude Pacemaker implanted on 7/31/09 at Ohio Valley Heart Care, in Evansville, Indiana, by Dr. Crevey. How do I find out if he accepted a kickback ? When I went in for a device check, the technician told me that the doctors implant different devices into different people. (I ignorantly assumed that the hospital used only St. Jude.) The technician informed me that the doctors use the devices of the companies which gives them the best sales pitch. That statement bothered me. It sounded as though the doctors are on the take; that they go to the highest bidder; which ever company greases their palms the best. What a damn racket ! Doctors, literally, gambling with our health; which we lay in their hands. Not only are there needed heavier fines and penalities on the companies, but the doctors need to be punished, perhaps, through the loss of the medical licenses. Jarrod March 29, 2011 This is one crazy story, doctors being paid by St. Jude Medical to implant defribrillators to install their device. Its all about money with these doctors and medical companies. I had a St. Jude device implanted in my chest of October 2006, and the date was the 13th. It fired of one day while I was showering. That was the beginning of 2010. Back in Feburary of this year, 2011. I had to have CPR done three different times to bring me back to life, simply cause the defribrillator didn’t work as it should have. No lawyer I contact won’t even take my case. When I heard of this lawsuit, I figure I need to get invovled in this, since I almost lost my life three times, cause the St. Jude device didn’t fire like its suppossed to. I thank God that He was there to save me, when a man made device, St. Jude, failed to fire off when I needed it most. Latonya March 2, 2011 I truly don’t understand about this whole situation. I for had a St.Jude defbrillator that caused me damages.The ICD pokes whole in my heart,delivered unwanted shocks ,blood poison and staff infection I had to have opened heart surgery for the removal of the generator the riata lead is still embedded in my heart without possible removal. the lead came detached from the generertor.I mad as the devil because I can’t get any help I’m 27 years old and have two kids that I scared evenutally i going to die what am I to do . LinkedInThis field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.Share Your CommentsFirst Name*Last NameEmail* Shared Comments*This field is hidden when viewing the formI authorize the above comments be posted on this page Yes NoPost Comment I authorize the above comments be posted on this pageWeekly Digest Opt-In Yes, send me a weekly email with the latest lawsuits, recalls and warnings.Want your comments reviewed by a lawyer?To have an attorney review your comments and contact you about a potential case, provide your contact information below. This will not be published.Contact Phone #Alt Phone #Private CommentsNOTE: Providing information for review by an attorney does not form an attorney-client relationship.CAPTCHAGA SourceGA CampaignGA MediumGA ContentGA TermΔ MORE TOP STORIES Dupixent CTCL Studies Highlighted Cancer Risks For Years, Lawsuit Alleges (Posted: yesterday)A Dupixent CTCL lawsuit indicates manufacturers have long known the eczema treatment was linked to an increased cancer risk, but failed to warn doctors or patients.MORE ABOUT: DUPIXENT LAWSUITCTCL Lawsuit Alleges Diagnosis Came After Less Than a Year of Dupixent Use (07/29/2026)Lawsuit Alleges Dupixent Caused Mycosis Fungoides Diagnosis (07/21/2026)Dupixent MDL Judge To Meet With Lawyers for Initial Case Management Conference in October 2026 (06/25/2026) Abbott Continues to Oppose Spinal Cord Stimulator Lawsuit MDL, Despite Mounting Claims (Posted: 2 days ago)Manufacturer wants the Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation to reject a proposal by a group of plaintiffs to consolidate all federal Abbott spinal cord stimulator lawsuits.MORE ABOUT: SPINAL CORD STIMULATOR LAWSUITLawsuit Over Spinal Cord Stimulator Removal Claims Device Caused Numbness, Incontinence (08/06/2026)Spine Stimulator Injury Lawyers Seek Leadership Roles in Boston Scientific MDL (07/31/2026)Spinal Cord Stimulator Reprogramming Caused Electric Shocks, Worsening Pain: Lawsuit (07/27/2026) AngioDynamics SmartPort Infection Lawsuit Alleges Defective Port Caused Sepsis (Posted: 5 days ago)A Pennsylvania man has filed an AngioDynamics SmartPort lawsuit alleging catheter defects promoted bacterial growth, causing a severe infection and sepsis only weeks after implantation.MORE ABOUT: ANGIODYNAMICS PORT CATHETER LAWSUITPort Catheter Sepsis Lawsuit Claims Defective SmartPort Implant Caused Infection (07/22/2026)SmartPort Catheter Lawsuit Claims Defective AngioDynamics Port-a-Cath Caused Infection (07/14/2026)Vortex Port Lawsuit Claims Defective AngioDynamics Device Caused Infection, Pulmonary Embolism (07/07/2026)
Dupixent CTCL Studies Highlighted Cancer Risks For Years, Lawsuit Alleges (Posted: yesterday)A Dupixent CTCL lawsuit indicates manufacturers have long known the eczema treatment was linked to an increased cancer risk, but failed to warn doctors or patients.MORE ABOUT: DUPIXENT LAWSUITCTCL Lawsuit Alleges Diagnosis Came After Less Than a Year of Dupixent Use (07/29/2026)Lawsuit Alleges Dupixent Caused Mycosis Fungoides Diagnosis (07/21/2026)Dupixent MDL Judge To Meet With Lawyers for Initial Case Management Conference in October 2026 (06/25/2026)
Abbott Continues to Oppose Spinal Cord Stimulator Lawsuit MDL, Despite Mounting Claims (Posted: 2 days ago)Manufacturer wants the Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation to reject a proposal by a group of plaintiffs to consolidate all federal Abbott spinal cord stimulator lawsuits.MORE ABOUT: SPINAL CORD STIMULATOR LAWSUITLawsuit Over Spinal Cord Stimulator Removal Claims Device Caused Numbness, Incontinence (08/06/2026)Spine Stimulator Injury Lawyers Seek Leadership Roles in Boston Scientific MDL (07/31/2026)Spinal Cord Stimulator Reprogramming Caused Electric Shocks, Worsening Pain: Lawsuit (07/27/2026)
AngioDynamics SmartPort Infection Lawsuit Alleges Defective Port Caused Sepsis (Posted: 5 days ago)A Pennsylvania man has filed an AngioDynamics SmartPort lawsuit alleging catheter defects promoted bacterial growth, causing a severe infection and sepsis only weeks after implantation.MORE ABOUT: ANGIODYNAMICS PORT CATHETER LAWSUITPort Catheter Sepsis Lawsuit Claims Defective SmartPort Implant Caused Infection (07/22/2026)SmartPort Catheter Lawsuit Claims Defective AngioDynamics Port-a-Cath Caused Infection (07/14/2026)Vortex Port Lawsuit Claims Defective AngioDynamics Device Caused Infection, Pulmonary Embolism (07/07/2026)