Stryker Hip Replacement Lawsuits to be Selected for Bellwether Trials Over LFit V40 Component

|

The federal judge presiding over all Stryker hip replacement lawsuits involving problems caused by the recalled LFit v40 femoral head has outlined the process for selecting a small group of cases for “bellwether” trials.ย 

The Stryker LFit v40 is a component used in several hip replacement systems, which was removed from the market last year amid a higher-than-expected number of reports involvingย hip complications and failures, including taper lock problems with the cobalt-chromium femoral head that may result in pain, inflammation, loss of mobility, disassociation and the need for risky revision surgery.

Given similar questions of fact and law raised in cases filed nationwide, allย hip replacement lawsuitsย involving the Stryker LFit v30 have been centralized before U.S. District Judge Indira Talwani in the U.S. District Court for the District of Massachusetts, as part of an MDL or multidistrict litigation.

"*" indicates required fields

"*" indicates required fields

In a case management order (PDF) issued on December 8, Judge Talwani called on plaintiffs and defendants to each select nine cases, for a total of 18, which will be included in an initial bellwether discovery pool. By February 2, 2018, the parties have been directed to submit their selections from any cases filed before December 12, 2017, where a “substantially completed” Plaintiffs’ Fact Sheet was served on or before January 12, 2018.

The order also lays out the process for scheduling depositions with plaintiffs, their spouses or significant others, and physicians.

For any bellwether cases subsequently dismissed by plaintiffs before October 2018, Judge Talwani indicates that the manufacturer will be permitted to select a replacement case. Any bellwether cases resolved through a settlement by the same date, Judge Talwani indicates that plaintiffs will be permitted to name a replacement.

In September 2018, the parties will each submit proposals regarding how many of the 18 bellwether cases will be eligible for the initial trial pool, with the first cases expected to go before a jury on September 16, 2019.

While the outcome of such bellwether trials are not binding on other plaintiffs, they are closely watched in complex product liability litigation, where large numbers of cases raise similar allegations and injury claims, as they may help the parties gauge how juries will respond to evidence and testimony that is likely to be repeated throughout the litigation.

Similar centralized proceedings were previously established in the federal court system following a 2012ย Stryker Rejuvenate and ABG II recall, which resulted in thousands of lawsuits brought by individuals nationwide. Following coordinated discovery in that litigation, the manufacturer agreed to pay more than $1 billion inย hip implant settlementsย to resolve cases for individuals who required revision surgery after these recalled implant failed.


0 Comments


This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

Share Your Comments

This field is hidden when viewing the form
I authorize the above comments be posted on this page
Post Comment
Weekly Digest Opt-In

Want your comments reviewed by a lawyer?

To have an attorney review your comments and contact you about a potential case, provide your contact information below. This will not be published.

NOTE: Providing information for review by an attorney does not form an attorney-client relationship.

MORE TOP STORIES

A new claim against Boston Scientific joins a growing number of spinal cord stimulator lawsuits alleging the systems have failed to relieve pain and instead worsened symptoms for many individuals.