Sports Betting Addiction Lawsuit Sports betting addiction lawsuits are being investigated for college students and young adults who developed gambling problems after using apps like FanDuel and DraftKings, alleging that the platforms failed to warn about the addictive nature of their features and marketing practices.
Nitrous Oxide Lawsuit Individuals who suffered harm, or families who lost a loved one after using nitrous oxide products may be eligible for financial compensation through a nitrous oxide lawsuit.
Hair Relaxer Lawsuit Regular exposure to chemicals in hair relaxer may cause uterine cancer, ovarian cancer and other injuries. Women diagnosed with cancer may be eligible for settlement benefits.
Depo-Provera Lawsuit Depo-Provera lawsuits are being investigated for women who developed meningioma brain tumors after receiving Depo-Provera birth control shots, claiming that Pfizer failed to adequately disclose side effects.
Ozempic Lawsuit Lawyers are pursuing Ozempic lawsuits, Wegovy lawsuits and Mounjaro lawsuits over gastroparesis or stomach paralysis, which can leave users with long-term gastrointestinal side effects
Suboxone Tooth Decay Lawsuit Lawsuits are being pursued by users of Suboxone who experienced tooth loss, broken teeth or required dental extractions. Settlement benefits may be available.
Change Healthcare Lawsuit Lawyers are reviewing Change Healthcare class action lawsuits for individuals who had their personal information stolen due to the data breach.
Bard PowerPort Lawsuit Serious and life-threatening injuries have been linked to problems with Bard PowerPort. Lawsuits are now being pursued by individuals who suffered injuries from the implantable port catheter fracturing or migrating.
AngioDynamics Port Catheter Lawsuit Serious and life-threatening injuries have been linked to problems with Bard PowerPort. Lawsuits are now being pursued by individuals who suffered injuries from the implantable port catheter fracturing or migrating.
Processed Food Lawsuit Lawsuits are being pursued against the food industry over their manufacturing and advertising of ultra-processed foods, which have caused a generation of children to face an increased risk of developing childhood diabetes and other chronic illnesses.
Stryker Rejuvenate Hip Stem Lawsuits, Mediation Efforts Continuing in N.J. October 31, 2013 Austin Kirk Add Your Comments As hundreds of Stryker Rejuvenate hip lawsuits continue to move forward in New Jersey state court, mediation efforts are set to begin in an attempt to reach a settlement. More than 430 product liability lawsuits involving the recalled Stryker Rejuvenate and ABG II hip stems are currently centralized in the Superior Court for Bergen County, New Jersey before Judge Brian R. Martinotti, with about 25% of those cases being filed within the past three months. According to a case management order (PDF) issued by Judge Martinotti on October 23, the parties have selected a small number of cases to move forward with Phase I mediation, which is to take place no later than December 15. A total of 10 cases will be negotiated during these initial mediation efforts, including six cases randomly selected by the Court, two cases selected by plaintiffs and two cases selected by defendants. Learn More About Hip Replacement Lawsuits If you or a loved one experienced complications or needed revision surgery due to a defective hip implant, you may be entitled to financial compensation. Learn More SEE IF YOU QUALIFY FOR COMPENSATION Learn More About Hip Replacement Lawsuits If you or a loved one experienced complications or needed revision surgery due to a defective hip implant, you may be entitled to financial compensation. Learn More SEE IF YOU QUALIFY FOR COMPENSATION A second phase of mediation is expected to discuss Stryker Rejuvenate settlements for all cases filed and served after April 2, 2013, but prior to July 26, 2013 in which the plaintiff has opted to be included in the process and provided a required Preliminary Disclosure Fact Sheet. Judge Martinotti has ordered the parties to meet and confer by November 16 to devise a method for mediating cases filed prior to April 2, 2013, which were not selected as part of the Phase I group. If mediation fails, it is likely that a small number of cases will be selected to serve as test cases, known as “bellwether” trials. Such early trial dates are designed to help the parties gauge the relative strengths and weaknesses of their cases and may facilitate further attempts to settle Stryker Rejuvenate cases to avoid hundreds of individual trials. Federal Stryker Rejuvenate Litigation In addition to the New Jersey state court litigation, nearly 350 complaints are filed in U.S. District Courts throughout the country. These cases have been centralized for coordinated pretrial proceedings as part of an MDL, or Multidistrict Litigation, before U.S. District Judge Donovan Frank in the District of Minnesota. More than 20,000 Stryker Rejuvenate or ABG II hip stems were sold in the United States before a recall was issued in July 2012, so it is ultimately expected that thousands of cases may be brought as individuals experience early failure of their Stryker hip stem, which often results in the need for removal surgery. Unlike traditional hip implants, which feature a single femoral component, the Stryker Rejuvenate and ABG II are modular hipstems, featuring two pieces that fit inside each other to allow the surgeon to customize the length of the femoral component based on the patient. However, the design has been linked to an increased risk of problems that may result from the release of microscopic metal debris as the chromium-cobalt neck rubs against the titanium femoral stem. This can cause the implants to corrode or fret at the modular junction, increasing the risk of inflammation and loosening of the hip implant. Although hip implants are typically expected to last 15 to 20 years, a Stryker Rejuvenate hip stem recall was issued only two years after the design was introduced. At the time the artificial hip system was removed from the market, the manufacturer acknowledged that the design was prone to fret and corrode at the modular stem, increasing the risk of problems within a few years after hip replacement surgery. All of the product liability complaints pending throughout the country involve similar allegations that Howmedica and their Stryker subsidiaries designed and sold a defective and unreasonably dangerous hip system. Plaintiffs claim that inadequate warnings and information was provided to consumers or the medical community about the risk of problems with Stryker Rejuvenate hip replacements. Tags: Hip Replacement System, New Jersey, Stryker ASBG II, Stryker Rejuvenate Image Credit: | More Hip Replacements Lawsuit Stories Biomet Hip Lawsuit Filed Over Defective M2A Metal-on-Metal Implant December 26, 2024 Zimmer Biomet Lawsuit Filed Over RibFix Blu Implant Fracture September 25, 2024 Zimmer Biomet CPT Hip System Linked to Increased Risk of Thigh Bone Fractures, FDA Warns September 18, 2024 0 Comments Share Your CommentsFirst Name*Last NameEmail* Shared Comments*This field is hidden when viewing the formI authorize the above comments be posted on this page Yes No Post Comment I authorize the above comments be posted on this page Weekly Digest Opt-In Yes, send me a weekly email with the latest lawsuits, recalls and warnings. Want your comments reviewed by a lawyer?To have an attorney review your comments and contact you about a potential case, provide your contact information below. This will not be published.Contact Phone #Alt Phone #Private CommentsNOTE: Providing information for review by an attorney does not form an attorney-client relationship.CAPTCHAGA SourceGA CampaignGA MediumGA ContentGA TermCommentsThis field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged. Δ MORE TOP STORIES Oxbryta Settlement Discussions in Class Action Lawsuits Set for Sept. 2025 (Posted: today) A mediator has been appointed to oversee settlement discussions between parties involved in an Oxbryta class action lawsuit, which claims the recalled drug endangered sickle cell disease patients. MORE ABOUT: OXBRYTA LAWSUITWrongful Death Lawsuit Links Oxbryta Side Effects to Deadly Vaso-Occlusive Crises (06/05/2025)Oxbryta Recall Lawsuit Alleges Sickle Cell Drug Increased Frequency of Dangerous VOCs (05/23/2025)First Oxbryta Lawsuit Set for Trial in August 2027, Over Recalled Sickle Cell Drug Risks (05/09/2025) Lawsuit Indicates Biozorb Side Effects Left Woman With Chronic Pain, Disfiguring Injuries (Posted: yesterday) A BioZorb side effects lawsuit indicates that a woman is suffering chronic pain and soreness after the tissue marker implant failed to absorb into her body as advertised. MORE ABOUT: BIOZORB LAWSUITBioZorb Implant Removal Surgery: What Women Need To Know When the Device Fails To Dissolve (06/30/2025)Lawsuit Claims Biozorb Implant Penetrated Skin, Causing Massive Infection (06/04/2025)Breast Cancer Survivors File BioZorb Tissue Marker Lawsuit After Implant Fails (05/20/2025) Second Wave of Valsartan Cancer Lawsuits To Be Ready for Bellwether Trials by January 2026 (Posted: yesterday) A new schedule for a second wave of Valsartan cancer lawsuit bellwether trials hopes to have a case ready to go before a jury by January 2026. MORE ABOUT: VALSARTAN LAWSUITCourt Outlines Valsartan Lawsuits Trial Schedule for “Wave 2” Bellwether Cases (05/28/2025)Order Requires Valsartan Recall Lawsuits To Provide Product Identification for Specific Generic Drug Makers Named (03/27/2025)Deadlines Leading to First Valsartan Bellwether Trial on Sept. 8, 2025 Outlined by Special Master (03/04/2025)
Zimmer Biomet CPT Hip System Linked to Increased Risk of Thigh Bone Fractures, FDA Warns September 18, 2024
Oxbryta Settlement Discussions in Class Action Lawsuits Set for Sept. 2025 (Posted: today) A mediator has been appointed to oversee settlement discussions between parties involved in an Oxbryta class action lawsuit, which claims the recalled drug endangered sickle cell disease patients. MORE ABOUT: OXBRYTA LAWSUITWrongful Death Lawsuit Links Oxbryta Side Effects to Deadly Vaso-Occlusive Crises (06/05/2025)Oxbryta Recall Lawsuit Alleges Sickle Cell Drug Increased Frequency of Dangerous VOCs (05/23/2025)First Oxbryta Lawsuit Set for Trial in August 2027, Over Recalled Sickle Cell Drug Risks (05/09/2025)
Lawsuit Indicates Biozorb Side Effects Left Woman With Chronic Pain, Disfiguring Injuries (Posted: yesterday) A BioZorb side effects lawsuit indicates that a woman is suffering chronic pain and soreness after the tissue marker implant failed to absorb into her body as advertised. MORE ABOUT: BIOZORB LAWSUITBioZorb Implant Removal Surgery: What Women Need To Know When the Device Fails To Dissolve (06/30/2025)Lawsuit Claims Biozorb Implant Penetrated Skin, Causing Massive Infection (06/04/2025)Breast Cancer Survivors File BioZorb Tissue Marker Lawsuit After Implant Fails (05/20/2025)
Second Wave of Valsartan Cancer Lawsuits To Be Ready for Bellwether Trials by January 2026 (Posted: yesterday) A new schedule for a second wave of Valsartan cancer lawsuit bellwether trials hopes to have a case ready to go before a jury by January 2026. MORE ABOUT: VALSARTAN LAWSUITCourt Outlines Valsartan Lawsuits Trial Schedule for “Wave 2” Bellwether Cases (05/28/2025)Order Requires Valsartan Recall Lawsuits To Provide Product Identification for Specific Generic Drug Makers Named (03/27/2025)Deadlines Leading to First Valsartan Bellwether Trial on Sept. 8, 2025 Outlined by Special Master (03/04/2025)