Skip Navigation

Eligible for a Surgical Scope lawsuit?

Olympus Scope Wrongful Death Lawsuit Filed Over ERCP Infection

Olympus Scope Wrongful Death Lawsuit Filed Over ERCP Infection

A Kentucky man has filed a wrongful death lawsuit claiming his wife died of septic shock and multiorgan failure due to an Olympus endoscope infection caused by the medical cameraโ€™s design.

The complaint (PDF) was brought by Raymond Nichols, Sr. on behalf of himself and his late wife, Peggy Sue Nichols in May in the Philadelphia Court of Common Pleas. The lawsuit names Olympus Medical Systems Corporation and its U.S. subsidiaries as defendants, who removed the lawsuit to the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania on August 28.

Nichols says his wife died because of the design of the Olympus endoscope, which he alleges passed on infectious material from a previous patient because the device was not sterilized properly. He argues the failure to sterilize the device properly was due to its design, which has deep grooves and moving parts where infectious material can stay hidden during the sterilization process.

Olympus Endoscope Infections

Endoscopes are devices that allow doctors to see inside of the body during certain medical procedures, such as endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP)colonoscopyupper endoscopy and bronchoscopy. Manufactured by Olympus, FujiFilm and other traditionally optics-focused manufacturers, endoscopes contain small cameras, lights, long narrow channels and moving parts that allow doctors to examine internal organs, diagnose medical conditions and perform certain treatments without open surgery.

More than 22 million gastrointestinal endoscopic procedures are performed in the United States every year, including roughly 15 to 19 million colonoscopies and more than 650,000 ERCP procedures. An estimated 50 million colonoscopies are performed annually around the world. Since these devices are often used on multiple patients, the scopes must be thoroughly cleaned, disinfected and reprocessed after each procedure.

However, Nichols joins a growing number of individuals who have filed Olympus endoscope lawsuits, indicating that bacteria, biofilm, tissue and other debris may remain trapped inside the scopes, especially in narrow channels or damaged areas that are difficult to inspect, allowing infections to pass from one patient to another. Plaintiffs claim these design and warning failures exposed patients to serious bacterial infections, sepsis, organ failure and in some cases, even death.

Olympus-Surgical-Scope-Infection-Lawsuit
Olympus-Surgical-Scope-Infection-Lawsuit

Olympus Scope Wrongful Death Allegations

According to the complaint, Peggy Sue Nichols underwent an ERCP in May 2025. The procedure was performed with an Olympus TJF-Q190V, a duodenovideoscope used for ERCP procedure.

Later that same evening, she began experiencing severe abdominal pain and was diagnosed with sepsis.

โ€œWithin 36 hours of her ERCP, Decedent was in septic shock and multisystem organ failure due to the infection. Decedent was flown via helicopter to Ohio State University Hospital, where her septic shock and multisystem organ failure were treated and stabilized.โ€

Raymond Nichols, Sr. et al. v. Olympus Medical Corporation et al.

The lawsuit indicates that cultures revealed the source of the sepsis was Klebsiella pneumoniae, โ€œthe same bacteria which was transmitted by the endoscope was linked to an endoscope in the Netherlands that caused an outbreak in 2015.โ€

Nichols endured seven major abdominal surgeries from July 2025 until her death on November 15, 2025. Her husbandโ€™s lawsuit presents claims of negligence, negligent failure to warn, negligent design and manufacturing defect, negligent misrepresentation and omissions, fraud, failure to warn, design defect, manufacturing defect, breach of warranty, loss of consortium and wrongful death. He seeks both compensatory and punitive damages.

Olympus Endoscope Lawsuits

Olympus endoscope lawyers are reviewing potential Olympus endoscope lawsuits for individuals nationwide who suffered serious infections or lost loved ones after an ERCP or other endoscopic procedure involving a potentially contaminated reusable scope.

You may be eligible to file a claim if you or a loved one suffered any of the following after a colonoscopy, endoscopy, ERCP or bronchoscopy:

  • Sepsis
  • Bloodstream infections
  • Pneumonia
  • Organ failure
  • Wrongful death
  • Extended hospitalization
  • Emergency medical treatment
  • E. coli or other bacterial infections
  • Carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae (CRE)
  • Blood-borne infections, including HIV or tuberculosis
  • Exposure to drug-resistant bacteria or infectious diseases

All contaminated scope infection product liability lawsuits are handled on a contingency fee basis. This means there are no upfront costs to have a lawyer investigate your potential claim, and no legal fees or expenses are paid unless a settlement or recovery is obtained.

Sign up for more legal news that could affect you or your family.

Image Credit: Below the Sky / Shutterstock.com
Irvin Jackson
Written By: Irvin Jackson

Senior Legal Journalist & Contributing Editor

Irvin Jackson is a senior investigative reporter at AboutLawsuits.com with more than 30 years of experience covering mass tort litigation, environmental policy, and consumer safety. He previously served as Associate Editor at Inside the EPA and contributes original reporting on product liability lawsuits, regulatory failures, and nationwide litigation trends.



0 Comments


This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

Share Your Comments

This field is hidden when viewing the form
I authorize the above comments be posted on this page
Post Comment
Weekly Digest Opt-In

Want your comments reviewed by a lawyer?

To have an attorney review your comments and contact you about a potential case, provide your contact information below. This will not be published.

NOTE: Providing information for review by an attorney does not form an attorney-client relationship.

MORE TOP STORIES

A federal judge has appointed more than a dozen plaintiffs’ attorneys to serve in leadership positions in the developing Cartiva lawsuit litigation.
The U.S. District Judge overseeing Boston Scientific back stimulator litigation has ordered that lawsuits may now be filed directly with the federal MDL court in Central California.