Scope Infection Lawsuit Patients across the United States have filed medical scope infection lawsuits after contaminated endoscopes and duodenoscopes allegedly transmitted dangerous bacterial infections during procedures such as ERCP, colonoscopy, and other endoscopic treatments.
Spinal Cord Stimulator Lawsuit Spinal cord stimulator lawsuits allege that implanted pain devices malfunctioned, migrated, or caused nerve damage, often forcing patients to undergo revision or removal surgery.
Depo-Provera Lawsuit Depo-Provera lawsuits are being investigated for women who developed meningioma brain tumors after receiving Depo-Provera birth control shots, claiming that Pfizer failed to adequately disclose side effects.
Suboxone Tooth Decay Lawsuit Lawsuits are being pursued by users of Suboxone who experienced tooth loss, broken teeth or required dental extractions. Settlement benefits may be available.
Ozempic Lawsuit Lawyers are pursuing Ozempic lawsuits, Wegovy lawsuits and Mounjaro lawsuits over gastroparesis or stomach paralysis, which can leave users with long-term gastrointestinal side effects
Hair Relaxer Lawsuit Regular exposure to chemicals in hair relaxer may cause uterine cancer, ovarian cancer and other injuries. Women diagnosed with cancer may be eligible for settlement benefits.
Nitrous Oxide Lawsuit Individuals who suffered harm, or families who lost a loved one after using nitrous oxide products may be eligible for financial compensation through a nitrous oxide lawsuit.
Breast Mesh Lawsuit Lawyers are investigating breast mesh lawsuits for women who suffered infections, pain, or implant failure from internal bra implants used in breast reconstruction surgery.
Bard PowerPort Lawsuit Serious and life-threatening injuries have been linked to problems with Bard PowerPort. Lawsuits are now being pursued by individuals who suffered injuries from the implantable port catheter fracturing or migrating.
Sports Betting Addiction Lawsuit Sports betting addiction lawsuits are being investigated for college students and young adults who developed gambling problems after using apps like FanDuel and DraftKings, alleging that the platforms failed to warn about the addictive nature of their features and marketing practices.
Tanning Bed Restrictions Would Ban Children, Require Risk Waiver for Adults December 21, 2015 Martha Garcia Add Your CommentsThe FDA proposed two new rules on Friday that would place severe restrictions on indoor tanning due to the risk of skin cancer and burns, banning use of tanning beds by those under 18 and requiring adults to regularly sign waivers acknowledging that they have been warned about the tanning bed risks.The tanning bed restrictions proposed by the FDA come amid continuing concerns about the link between indoor tanning salons and cancer, and the popularity of the devices among children and teens.Under the new rules, individuals under the age of 18 will be banned from using any indoor tanning beds or tanning lamps. In addition, those over the age of 18 would be required to sign a risk acknowledgement certification every six months, stating that they were informed of the indoor tanning risks.Do You Know about…Spinal Cord Stimulator lawsuitsSpinal cord stimulator lawsuits are being investigated for individuals who suffered unnecessary shocks, burns or other problems, often resulting in the need for additional surgery to remove the SCS.Learn MoreSEE IF YOU QUALIFY FOR COMPENSATIONDo You Know AboutโฆSpinal Cord Stimulator lawsuitsSpinal cord stimulator lawsuits are being investigated for individuals who suffered unnecessary shocks, burns or other problems, often resulting in the need for additional surgery to remove the SCS.Learn MoreSEE IF YOU QUALIFY FOR COMPENSATIONMore than 1.6 million minors use indoor tanning beds every year, according to data from the 2013 National Youth Risk Behavior Survey, heightening their risk of skin cancer.Researchers warn the effects of using tanning beds accumulates over a lifetime, putting teens and young tanners at higher risk of experiencing adverse effects later in life. Teens who use tanning beds compared to those that tan outdoors, face a higher risk of developing basal cell carcinoma.There are more than 400,000 cases of skin cancer are diagnosed every year, including 6,000 cases of melanoma, the deadliest form of skin cancer. Many of these cases have been specifically attributed to the use of tanning beds.Research from 2012 suggested that indoor tanning before the age of 35 increases the risk of developing melanoma by 75 percent.โTodayโs action is intended to help protect young people from a known and preventable cause of skin cancer and other harms,โ acting FDA Commissioner Stephen Ostroff, M.D, said in the FDA announcement. โIndividuals under 18 years are at greatest risk of the adverse health consequences of indoor tanning.โThe Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) warn that the risk posed by indoor tanning devices, including tanning beds and tanning lamps, is not only the risk of cancer. An average of 3,000 emergency room visits occur every year in the U.S. because of other injuries related to indoor tanning.The second proposed FDA rule would help to improve the safety of indoor tanning devices overall. The rule include provisions to strengthen tanning device warnings so they are easier to read and more prominently placed. It also requires an emergency shut off switch, or a panic button.Additionally, safety eyewear must be improved to limit the amount of light allowed through the protective eyewear; and replacement bulbs labeling must be improved so operators can ensure they replace old bulbs with correct replacements, reducing accidental burns.Finally, the rule prohibits any modifications to tanning devices that could pose a risk to users, such as replacing bulbs with stronger, more harmful, bulbs.The proposed rules and restrictions would apply to manufacturers and tanning facility operators. There are nearly 19,000 tanning salons in the U.S. and another 20,000 other facilities, like health clubs or spas, that have tanning beds in them. Research published last year found tanning salons outnumbered McDonaldโs restaurants in Florida.Research from the International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC), a division of the World Health Organization, has concluded that tanning devices are more dangerous than previously thought. The IARC moved tanning devices to the highest cancer risk category deemed โcarcinogenicย to humans.โTanning devices can cause skin cancer, burns, premature skin aging and eye damage. A 2006 IARC review of tanning bed research found an association between tanning and two types of skin cancer, squamous cell carcinoma and melanoma. It also found an association between UV emitting tanning devices and eye cancer. Written by: Martha GarciaHealth & Medical Research WriterMartha Garcia is a health and medical research writer at AboutLawsuits.com with over 15 years of experience covering peer-reviewed studies and emerging public health risks. She previously led content strategy at The Blogsmith and contributes original reporting on drug safety, medical research, and health trends impacting consumers. Tags: Melanoma, Skin Cancer, Tanning BedMore Lawsuit Stories $53M Awarded to Families of Babies Who Developed NEC From Similac Special Care Formula April 10, 2026 Nurse Assist Saline Solution Lawsuit Alleges Contamination Caused Severe Infection April 10, 2026 Oster Countertop Oven Lawsuit Claims Recalled Device Caused Third Degree Burns April 10, 2026 0 Comments CompanyThis field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.Share Your CommentsFirst Name*Last NameEmail* Shared Comments*This field is hidden when viewing the formI authorize the above comments be posted on this page Yes NoPost Comment I authorize the above comments be posted on this pageWeekly Digest Opt-In Yes, send me a weekly email with the latest lawsuits, recalls and warnings.Want your comments reviewed by a lawyer?To have an attorney review your comments and contact you about a potential case, provide your contact information below. This will not be published.Contact Phone #Alt Phone #Private CommentsNOTE: Providing information for review by an attorney does not form an attorney-client relationship.CAPTCHAGA SourceGA CampaignGA MediumGA ContentGA TermΔ MORE TOP STORIES $53M Awarded to Families of Babies Who Developed NEC From Similac Special Care Formula (Posted: yesterday)A jury has awarded $53 million to four mothers who say their children suffered life-altering NEC injuries from being fed Similac infant formula shortly after being born preterm.MORE ABOUT: ENFAMIL AND SIMILAC BABY FORMULA LAWSUITEnfamil Lawsuit Claims Premature Infant Required Partial Intestine Removal From NEC Side Effects (03/12/2026)High Levels of Heavy Metals Found in More Than 25 Additional Infant Formulas: Report (03/09/2026)Trial Over Similac Necrotizing Enterocolitis Injuries Underway in Chicago (03/06/2026) Vortex Port Lawsuit Filed After Port Catheter Removed Due to Infection, Blood Clots (Posted: 2 days ago)AngioDynamics faces a Vortex port lawsuit from a woman who says the device only lasted a month before causing an infection and dangerous blood clots in her neck.MORE ABOUT: ANGIODYNAMICS PORT CATHETER LAWSUITPort Catheter Infection Lawsuit Claims SmartPort Defects Caused Sepsis, Pulmonary Embolism (03/23/2026)Chemotherapy Injection Port Lawsuit Blames AngioDynamics SmartPort for Wrongful Death (03/13/2026)Port Catheter Lawyers Outline Process for Selecting Bellwether Lawsuits in AngioDynamics MDL (03/06/2026) Boston Scientific Neuromodulation Lawsuit Claims Spinal Cord Stimulator Exacerbated Chronic Pain (Posted: 3 days ago)A new claim against Boston Scientific joins a growing number of spinal cord stimulator lawsuits alleging the systems have failed to relieve pain and instead worsened symptoms for many individuals.MORE ABOUT: SPINAL CORD STIMULATOR LAWSUITMedtronic SCS Lawsuit Alleges Intellis LT Neurostimulator Caused Worsening Pain (04/03/2026)Nevro Spinal Cord Stimulator Lawsuits Filed Over Device Malfunction, Failure (03/30/2026)Abbott Proclaim SCS Lawsuit Alleges Stimulator Lead Migration Resulted in Multiple Surgeries (03/24/2026)
$53M Awarded to Families of Babies Who Developed NEC From Similac Special Care Formula April 10, 2026
$53M Awarded to Families of Babies Who Developed NEC From Similac Special Care Formula (Posted: yesterday)A jury has awarded $53 million to four mothers who say their children suffered life-altering NEC injuries from being fed Similac infant formula shortly after being born preterm.MORE ABOUT: ENFAMIL AND SIMILAC BABY FORMULA LAWSUITEnfamil Lawsuit Claims Premature Infant Required Partial Intestine Removal From NEC Side Effects (03/12/2026)High Levels of Heavy Metals Found in More Than 25 Additional Infant Formulas: Report (03/09/2026)Trial Over Similac Necrotizing Enterocolitis Injuries Underway in Chicago (03/06/2026)
Vortex Port Lawsuit Filed After Port Catheter Removed Due to Infection, Blood Clots (Posted: 2 days ago)AngioDynamics faces a Vortex port lawsuit from a woman who says the device only lasted a month before causing an infection and dangerous blood clots in her neck.MORE ABOUT: ANGIODYNAMICS PORT CATHETER LAWSUITPort Catheter Infection Lawsuit Claims SmartPort Defects Caused Sepsis, Pulmonary Embolism (03/23/2026)Chemotherapy Injection Port Lawsuit Blames AngioDynamics SmartPort for Wrongful Death (03/13/2026)Port Catheter Lawyers Outline Process for Selecting Bellwether Lawsuits in AngioDynamics MDL (03/06/2026)
Boston Scientific Neuromodulation Lawsuit Claims Spinal Cord Stimulator Exacerbated Chronic Pain (Posted: 3 days ago)A new claim against Boston Scientific joins a growing number of spinal cord stimulator lawsuits alleging the systems have failed to relieve pain and instead worsened symptoms for many individuals.MORE ABOUT: SPINAL CORD STIMULATOR LAWSUITMedtronic SCS Lawsuit Alleges Intellis LT Neurostimulator Caused Worsening Pain (04/03/2026)Nevro Spinal Cord Stimulator Lawsuits Filed Over Device Malfunction, Failure (03/30/2026)Abbott Proclaim SCS Lawsuit Alleges Stimulator Lead Migration Resulted in Multiple Surgeries (03/24/2026)