Hair Relaxer Lawsuit Regular exposure to chemicals in hair relaxer may cause uterine cancer, ovarian cancer and other injuries. Women diagnosed with cancer may be eligible for settlement benefits.
Depo-Provera Lawsuit Depo-Provera lawsuits are being investigated for women who developed meningioma brain tumors after receiving Depo-Provera birth control shots, claiming that Pfizer failed to adequately disclose side effects.
Suboxone Tooth Decay Lawsuit Lawsuits are being pursued by users of Suboxone who experienced tooth loss, broken teeth or required dental extractions. Settlement benefits may be available.
Ozempic Lawsuit Lawyers are pursuing Ozempic lawsuits, Wegovy lawsuits and Mounjaro lawsuits over gastroparesis or stomach paralysis, which can leave users with long-term gastrointestinal side effects
Change Healthcare Lawsuit Lawyers are reviewing Change Healthcare class action lawsuits for individuals who had their personal information stolen due to the data breach.
AngioDynamics Port Catheter Lawsuit Serious and life-threatening injuries have been linked to problems with Bard PowerPort. Lawsuits are now being pursued by individuals who suffered injuries from the implantable port catheter fracturing or migrating.
Bard PowerPort Lawsuit Serious and life-threatening injuries have been linked to problems with Bard PowerPort. Lawsuits are now being pursued by individuals who suffered injuries from the implantable port catheter fracturing or migrating.
Processed Food Lawsuit Lawsuits are being pursued against the food industry over their manufacturing and advertising of ultra-processed foods, which have caused a generation of children to face an increased risk of developing childhood diabetes and other chronic illnesses.
AFFF Lawsuit Exposure to firefighting foam chemicals may result in an increased risk of cancer for firefighters, military and airport personnel.
Paraquat Parkinson’s Disease Lawsuits Exposure to the toxic herbicide Paraquat has been linked to a risk of Parkinson's disease.
Taxotere Alopecia Lawsuit Filed By Woman Who Suffers On-Going Hairloss Problems April 22, 2016 Irvin Jackson Add Your Comments After battling breast cancer, a lawsuit recently filed by a Colorado woman alleges that side effects of Taxotere caused her to experience continuing hair loss for several years after completing chemotherapy treatments, known as permanent alopecia. The complaint (PDF) was filed late last month by Melissa F. Leith in the U.S. District Court for the District of Colorado, alleging that Sanofi-Aventis failed to adequately warn about the link between permanent alopecia and Taxotere. From February 2013 through April 2013, Leith underwent breast cancer chemotherapy to treat breast cancer involving the use of Taxotere, which is a high potency medication that is part of a class of drugs known as Taxanes. Learn More About Taxotere Lawsuits Side effects of Taxotere may cause sudden eye problems or result in permanent hair loss. Lawsuits reviewed nationwide. Learn More SEE IF YOU QUALIFY FOR COMPENSATION Learn More About Taxotere Lawsuits Side effects of Taxotere may cause sudden eye problems or result in permanent hair loss. Lawsuits reviewed nationwide. Learn More SEE IF YOU QUALIFY FOR COMPENSATION While temporary alopecia is a common chemotherapy side effect, the lawsuit indicates that neither Leith nor her doctors were told that Taxotere alopecia could be permanent. Since alternative treatments for her breast cancer were available, Leith alleges that she and her doctor were deprived of the opportunity to make an informed decision about whether to accept the risk of permanent hair problems. Taxotere (docetaxel) was approved by the FDA in May 1996, and is given by injection with other chemotherapy drugs. It is used for treatment of patients with locally advanced or metastatic breast cancer after prior chemotherapy attempts had failed, competing with several other treatment alternatives, which studies have shown are at least as effective. For women, Taxotere alopecia is a particularly disfiguring and damaging condition, according to the complaint, which indicates that it may cause great mental anguish, economic damages and diminished ability to work due to the psychological damage. Leith claims that Sanofi-Aventis knew or should have known that, unlike other cancer drugs, Taxotere had a high risk of permanent hair problems. However, rather than warnings consumer and the medical community, the drug maker allegedly concealed the information, and continued to engage in illegal and misleading advertising designed to entice doctors to use Taxotere over safer, lower potency Taxanes. “Although women might accept the possibility of permanent baldness as a result of the use of docetaxel (TAXOTERE®) if no other product were available to treat their cancer, this was not the case,” the lawsuit states. “Before Defendants’ wrongful conduct resulted in thousands of women being exposed to the side effects of docetaxel (TAXOTERE®), there were already similar products on the market that were at least as effective as docetaxel (TAXOTERE®) and did not subject female users to the same risk of disfiguring permanent alopecia as does docetaxel (TAXOTERE®). In 2005, a study known as GEICAM 9805 found that almost one out of every 10 patients who received Taxotere experienced long-term hair loss for up to 10 years and five months, and in some cases longer. This study was sponsored by Sanofi-Aventis, yet plaintiffs claim information about the permanent hair loss risk was withheld from consumers and the medical community. Reports of Taxotere hair loss problems were also submitted to the drug maker by medical providers. In 2006, at least one Denver-based oncologist reported that 6.3% of patients he treated with Taxotere suffered permanent hair loss for years after taking the drug. The case joins a growing number of Taxotere alopecia lawsuits filed in recent months by women who have been left with permanent baldness following chemotherapy treatment, indicating that they were under the impression their hair would regrow. Leith presents claims against Sanofi-Aventis for negligence, designing and manufacturing a defective product, failure to warn, breach of warranty, fraudulent misrepresentation, fraudulent concealment, negligent misrepresentation, strict product liability, fraud and deceit, as well as extreme and outrageous conduct in disregarding the risks associated with Taxotere. Tags: Breast Cancer, Cancer, Chemotherapy, Hair Loss, Sanofi-Aventis, Taxotere Image Credit: |test caption More Taxotere Lawsuit Stories Taxotere Epiphora Lawsuit Filed Over Excessively Watery Eyes March 24, 2023 Lack of Taxotere Warnings Over Blocked Tear Ducts Justify Lawsuits Moving Forward August 2, 2022 Motion Filed to Dismiss Taxotere Lawsuits Over Excessive Tearing Problems July 7, 2022 0 Comments Share Your CommentsFirst Name*Last NameEmail* Shared Comments*This field is hidden when viewing the formI authorize the above comments be posted on this page Yes No Post Comment I authorize the above comments be posted on this page Weekly Digest Opt-In Yes, send me a weekly email with the latest lawsuits, recalls and warnings. Want your comments reviewed by a lawyer?To have an attorney review your comments and contact you about a potential case, provide your contact information below. This will not be published.Contact Phone #Alt Phone #Private CommentsNOTE: Providing information for review by an attorney does not form an attorney-client relationship.CAPTCHAGA SourceGA CampaignGA MediumGA ContentGA TermPhoneThis field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged. Δ MORE TOP STORIES Depo-Provera Meningioma Diagnosis Information Required To Qualify for Lawsuit: Order (Posted: today) Women pursuing Depo-Provera meningioma lawsuits will have to provide documentary proof of their diagnosis and the versions of the birth control shot they received within 120 days of filing their case. MORE ABOUT: DEPO-PROVERA LAWSUITDepo-Provera Lawsuit Timeline for Preparing Pilot Trial Cases Outlined by MDL Judge (03/24/2025)Women Can File Depo-Provera Brain Tumor Lawsuits Directly in MDL: Court Order (03/18/2025)75 Lawyers in Depo-Provera Lawsuits Seek MDL Leadership Roles (03/10/2025) Cartiva SCI Lawsuit Alleges Toe Implant Worsened Pain, Decreased Range of Motion (Posted: yesterday) An Indiana woman has filed a Cartiva SCI implant lawsuit, indicating that the toe implant failed due to a defective design, resulting in the need for revision surgery and recommendations to permanently fuse her big toe. MORE ABOUT: CARTIVA IMPLANT LAWSUITCartiva Implant Injury Lawsuit Set for Trial in February 2026 (03/07/2025)Lawsuit Indicates Cartiva Implant Fails in 2 Out of 3 Patients, But Continued To Be Sold in U.S. (02/13/2025)Cartiva Toe Implant Lawsuit Filed Over Worsened Pain, Reduced Range of Motion and Need for Surgical Removal (02/07/2025) Salon Professionals Claim Occupational Exposure to Hair Dye Products Caused Bladder Cancer: Lawsuits (Posted: 4 days ago) Two California hair stylists filed separate lawsuits, indicating that repeated occupational exposure to toxic chemicals in hair coloring dyes caused them to develop bladder cancer. MORE ABOUT: HAIR DYE LAWSUITHair Color Lawsuit Filed Over Salon Worker’s Bladder Cancer Diagnosis (03/20/2025)Brazilian Blowout Cancer Lawsuit Filed by Missouri Hair Stylists Over Exosure to Toxic Chemicals (03/11/2025)Initial Status Conference for Hair Dresser’s Bladder Cancer Lawsuit Set for May 5 (03/10/2025)
Depo-Provera Meningioma Diagnosis Information Required To Qualify for Lawsuit: Order (Posted: today) Women pursuing Depo-Provera meningioma lawsuits will have to provide documentary proof of their diagnosis and the versions of the birth control shot they received within 120 days of filing their case. MORE ABOUT: DEPO-PROVERA LAWSUITDepo-Provera Lawsuit Timeline for Preparing Pilot Trial Cases Outlined by MDL Judge (03/24/2025)Women Can File Depo-Provera Brain Tumor Lawsuits Directly in MDL: Court Order (03/18/2025)75 Lawyers in Depo-Provera Lawsuits Seek MDL Leadership Roles (03/10/2025)
Cartiva SCI Lawsuit Alleges Toe Implant Worsened Pain, Decreased Range of Motion (Posted: yesterday) An Indiana woman has filed a Cartiva SCI implant lawsuit, indicating that the toe implant failed due to a defective design, resulting in the need for revision surgery and recommendations to permanently fuse her big toe. MORE ABOUT: CARTIVA IMPLANT LAWSUITCartiva Implant Injury Lawsuit Set for Trial in February 2026 (03/07/2025)Lawsuit Indicates Cartiva Implant Fails in 2 Out of 3 Patients, But Continued To Be Sold in U.S. (02/13/2025)Cartiva Toe Implant Lawsuit Filed Over Worsened Pain, Reduced Range of Motion and Need for Surgical Removal (02/07/2025)
Salon Professionals Claim Occupational Exposure to Hair Dye Products Caused Bladder Cancer: Lawsuits (Posted: 4 days ago) Two California hair stylists filed separate lawsuits, indicating that repeated occupational exposure to toxic chemicals in hair coloring dyes caused them to develop bladder cancer. MORE ABOUT: HAIR DYE LAWSUITHair Color Lawsuit Filed Over Salon Worker’s Bladder Cancer Diagnosis (03/20/2025)Brazilian Blowout Cancer Lawsuit Filed by Missouri Hair Stylists Over Exosure to Toxic Chemicals (03/11/2025)Initial Status Conference for Hair Dresser’s Bladder Cancer Lawsuit Set for May 5 (03/10/2025)