Scope Infection Lawsuit Patients across the United States have filed medical scope infection lawsuits after contaminated endoscopes and duodenoscopes allegedly transmitted dangerous bacterial infections during procedures such as ERCP, colonoscopy, and other endoscopic treatments.
Spinal Cord Stimulator Lawsuit Spinal cord stimulator lawsuits allege that implanted pain devices malfunctioned, migrated, or caused nerve damage, often forcing patients to undergo revision or removal surgery.
Depo-Provera Lawsuit Depo-Provera lawsuits are being investigated for women who developed meningioma brain tumors after receiving Depo-Provera birth control shots, claiming that Pfizer failed to adequately disclose side effects.
Suboxone Tooth Decay Lawsuit Lawsuits are being pursued by users of Suboxone who experienced tooth loss, broken teeth or required dental extractions. Settlement benefits may be available.
Chlorpyrifos Parkinsonโs Disease Lawsuit Chlorpyrifos lawsuits are being investigated for individuals diagnosed with Parkinsonโs disease after direct, residential, occupational or Gulf War pesticide exposure.
Ozempic Lawsuit Lawyers are pursuing Ozempic lawsuits, Wegovy lawsuits and Mounjaro lawsuits over gastroparesis or stomach paralysis, which can leave users with long-term gastrointestinal side effects
Hair Relaxer Lawsuit Regular exposure to chemicals in hair relaxer may cause uterine cancer, ovarian cancer and other injuries. Women diagnosed with cancer may be eligible for settlement benefits.
Bard PowerPort Lawsuit Serious and life-threatening injuries have been linked to problems with Bard PowerPort. Lawsuits are now being pursued by individuals who suffered injuries from the implantable port catheter fracturing or migrating.
Nitrous Oxide Lawsuit Individuals who suffered harm, or families who lost a loved one after using nitrous oxide products may be eligible for financial compensation through a nitrous oxide lawsuit.
Breast Mesh Lawsuit Lawyers are investigating breast mesh lawsuits for women who suffered infections, pain, or implant failure from internal bra implants used in breast reconstruction surgery.
Traumatic Brain Injury (TBI) Treatment Guidelines Do Not Effect Outcomes: Study July 28, 2015 Martha Garcia Add Your CommentsThe findings of new research suggest that treatment guidelines for traumatic brain injuries (TBI) may have no impact on the overall outcome or survival rates for patients.ย In a study published last week by the medical journal JAMA Surgery, researchers indicate that patients who were treated at hospitals that follow the recommended Brain Trauma Foundation (BTF) guidelines were no better off.A traumatic brain injury (TBI) can result from a severe blow to the head, causing loss of consciousness, skull fracture, internal bleeding or a combination of the three.Do You Know about…Spinal Cord Stimulator lawsuitsSpinal cord stimulator lawsuits are being investigated for individuals who suffered unnecessary shocks, burns or other problems, often resulting in the need for additional surgery to remove the SCS.Learn MoreSEE IF YOU QUALIFY FOR COMPENSATIONDo You Know AboutโฆSpinal Cord Stimulator lawsuitsSpinal cord stimulator lawsuits are being investigated for individuals who suffered unnecessary shocks, burns or other problems, often resulting in the need for additional surgery to remove the SCS.Learn MoreSEE IF YOU QUALIFY FOR COMPENSATIONThe Brain Trauma Foundation has issued guidelines for treating patients who have suffered a TBI, recommending that hospitals monitor intracranial pressure, blood pressure, oxygenation, administering antibiotics and use compression stockings. After the BTF guidelines were first published in the early 1990s, reports suggested that many hospitals saw a 50% decreased in the severe TBI death rate.In this new study, researchers focused on 14 hospitals within Los Angeles County that followed the Brain Trauma Foundation (BTF) guidelines. Two items were monitored for compliance; patient craniotomies and intracranial pressure (ICP) monitoring.The research team, lead by Dr. Aaron Dawes, from the University of California, Los Angles, found that there was a wide variance in compliance with guidelines among the hospitals in the study, ranging from 6.7% to 76% for craniotomies and 9.6% to 65 % for ICP monitoring.Overall, there was no association between compliance rates and better outcomes or lowered death rates. Death rates varied widely among the hospitals, however other research has shown survivors of traumatic brain injury are three times more likely to face a premature death.The findings have drawn criticism from proponents of the brain injury treatment guidelines, with some indicating that the largest group of patients included the study suffered ground level falls, and nearly 17% of patients had a loss of gray-white-matter differentiation. Critics say these patients should not be included in the study and many would have died regardless of their treatment, skewing study results. About 35% of patients in the study fit in this category.Other criticisms include researchers not examining other important guidelines, which may have shown better evidence of how it effects mortality.Researchers say the study highlights a need to determine what should be done to improve low performing hospitals and whether they should receive patients with TBIs.Critics warn that the study should not be taken out of context. Many say guideline compliance should not be used as a measure of hospital quality and that it doesnโt tell enough about the differences in hospitals and how they practice.Other research has also revealed some treatments to be unhelpful in treating TBI, including hyperbaric oxygen therapy, which proved to be no more than a placebo effect.Other studies have shown some promise in treating TBI. Research published last year showed promising results concluding traumatic brain injury may be effectively treated by vacuum pressure. The application of vacuum pressure helped to limit tissue damage after a TBI. Written by: Martha GarciaHealth & Medical Research WriterMartha Garcia is a health and medical research writer at AboutLawsuits.com with over 15 years of experience covering peer-reviewed studies and emerging public health risks. She previously led content strategy at The Blogsmith and contributes original reporting on drug safety, medical research, and health trends impacting consumers. Tags: Concussion, Hospital, TBI, Traumatic Brain Injury Image Credit: |More Lawsuit Stories Nitrous Oxide Paralysis Lawsuit Filed Against Galaxy Gas November 4, 2026 Inspire Sleep Apnea Implant Lawsuit Alleges Device Failed After Just 15 Months, Requiring Surgery November 4, 2026 Meta, Snap Reach Social Media Addiction Lawsuit Settlement on Eve of Trial November 4, 2026 1 Comments John December 23, 2015 Dr Paul Harsch, a leading Hyperbaric Oxygen Treatment (HBOT) University Based Researcher has pointed out the flaws with the DoD study cited above. Using the study’s own data he shows that it was misinterpreted and that the supposed “sham” (or placebo) was actually treatment as it provided increased oxygen levels in the brain. The potential of HBOT was first noted in patients with amputations that received HBOT as part of a normal course of treatment. It should also be noted that there are no drugs that are FDA approved to treat TBI – all of the drugs used per the VA treatment guideline are “off label” treatments, as are 8 of the 10 from the VA guideline for PTSD. It should also be noted that, statistically, the success rate for recovery using the VA PTSD guideline is on the order of 5% of those Veterans diagnosed. TBI and PTSD are critically important issues for our Veterans and information provided must be complete, balanced and accurate. Current drug based therapies are failing. Please correct the erroneous comments above. See: Harch PG. Hyperbaric oxygen therapy for post-concussion syndrome: contradictory conclusions from a study mischaracterized as sham-controlled. J Neurotrauma. 2013 Oct 11. [Epub ahead of print]. doi:10.1089/neu.2012.2799. Harch P. Department of Defense trials for hyperbaric oxgen and TBI: Issues of study design and questionable conclusions. Undersea Hyperb Med. 2013; 40(5):469-70. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text InstagramThis field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.Share Your CommentsFirst Name*Last NameEmail* Shared Comments*This field is hidden when viewing the formI authorize the above comments be posted on this page Yes NoPost Comment I authorize the above comments be posted on this pageWeekly Digest Opt-In Yes, send me a weekly email with the latest lawsuits, recalls and warnings.Want your comments reviewed by a lawyer?To have an attorney review your comments and contact you about a potential case, provide your contact information below. This will not be published.Contact Phone #Alt Phone #Private CommentsNOTE: Providing information for review by an attorney does not form an attorney-client relationship.CAPTCHAGA SourceGA CampaignGA MediumGA ContentGA TermΔ MORE TOP STORIES Nitrous Oxide Paralysis Lawsuit Filed Against Galaxy Gas (Posted: today)A womanโs lawsuit alleges that companies illegally promoted and sold nitrous oxide canisters for recreational inhalation, causing her to become addicted to the gas and ultimately suffer paralysis.MORE ABOUT: NITROUS OXIDE LAWSUITDozens File Joint Nitrous Oxide Addiction Lawsuit Against Amazon, Third-Party Retailers (10/15/2026)Nitrous Oxide Injury Lawsuit Filed Over B12 Deficiency, Long-Term Side Effects (10/09/2026)Amazon, Online Nitrous Oxide Sellers Face Class Action Lawsuit Over Health and Safety Risks (09/04/2026) Bard PowerPort Infection Lawsuit Claims Catheter Fractures Harbored Bacteria (Posted: yesterday)An Illinois man’s lawsuit accuses C.R. Bard of using a defective material in its PowerPort port catheter’s construction, causing him to suffer an infection and device failure.MORE ABOUT: BARD POWERPORT LAWSUITFourth Bard PowerPort Bellwether Case Set for Trial Dec. 1, as Third Gets Underway (10/14/2026)Judge Clears Bard PowerPort Lawsuit for Trial, Rejecting Motion for Summary Judgment (10/02/2026)Bard PowerPort Infection Lawsuit Set for Third Bellwether Trial to Begin Oct. 13 (09/14/2026) Abbott Sales Reps Kept Trying to Reprogram Failed SCS Implant: Lawsuit (Posted: 2 days ago)An Abbott SCS Implant lawsuit claims the manufacturers’ sales representatives potentially delayed removal of a failed device due to attempts to try to reprogram it.MORE ABOUT: SPINAL CORD STIMULATOR LAWSUITAbbott Proclaim Elite Lawsuit Alleges Spinal Cord Stimulator Malfunction Worsened Chronic Pain (10/29/2026)Boston Scientific Spectra WaveWriter Lawsuit Alleges Lead Fracture, Migration and Painful Electric Shocks (10/21/2026)Abbott Spinal Cord Stimulator Lead Problems Caused Burning, Shocks, Lawsuit Alleges (10/16/2026)
Inspire Sleep Apnea Implant Lawsuit Alleges Device Failed After Just 15 Months, Requiring Surgery November 4, 2026
Nitrous Oxide Paralysis Lawsuit Filed Against Galaxy Gas (Posted: today)A womanโs lawsuit alleges that companies illegally promoted and sold nitrous oxide canisters for recreational inhalation, causing her to become addicted to the gas and ultimately suffer paralysis.MORE ABOUT: NITROUS OXIDE LAWSUITDozens File Joint Nitrous Oxide Addiction Lawsuit Against Amazon, Third-Party Retailers (10/15/2026)Nitrous Oxide Injury Lawsuit Filed Over B12 Deficiency, Long-Term Side Effects (10/09/2026)Amazon, Online Nitrous Oxide Sellers Face Class Action Lawsuit Over Health and Safety Risks (09/04/2026)
Bard PowerPort Infection Lawsuit Claims Catheter Fractures Harbored Bacteria (Posted: yesterday)An Illinois man’s lawsuit accuses C.R. Bard of using a defective material in its PowerPort port catheter’s construction, causing him to suffer an infection and device failure.MORE ABOUT: BARD POWERPORT LAWSUITFourth Bard PowerPort Bellwether Case Set for Trial Dec. 1, as Third Gets Underway (10/14/2026)Judge Clears Bard PowerPort Lawsuit for Trial, Rejecting Motion for Summary Judgment (10/02/2026)Bard PowerPort Infection Lawsuit Set for Third Bellwether Trial to Begin Oct. 13 (09/14/2026)
Abbott Sales Reps Kept Trying to Reprogram Failed SCS Implant: Lawsuit (Posted: 2 days ago)An Abbott SCS Implant lawsuit claims the manufacturers’ sales representatives potentially delayed removal of a failed device due to attempts to try to reprogram it.MORE ABOUT: SPINAL CORD STIMULATOR LAWSUITAbbott Proclaim Elite Lawsuit Alleges Spinal Cord Stimulator Malfunction Worsened Chronic Pain (10/29/2026)Boston Scientific Spectra WaveWriter Lawsuit Alleges Lead Fracture, Migration and Painful Electric Shocks (10/21/2026)Abbott Spinal Cord Stimulator Lead Problems Caused Burning, Shocks, Lawsuit Alleges (10/16/2026)