J&J Ads Contain Misleading Safety Stats On Tremfya, Novartis Lawsuit Claims

Novartis has filed a lawsuit against Johnson & Johnson and its Janssen subsidiary, alleging that misleading safety information has been provided about the psoriasis drug Tremfya.

The complaint (PDF) was filed last week in the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia, seeking an injunction to prevent Janssen from providing what Novartis says is false advertising. The lawsuit claims that the misleading safety data gives Tremfya an unfair advantage against the Novartis psoriasis drug, Cosentyx.

Tremfya marketing materials cherry-pick data from a recent study, according to the lawsuit. Known as the “ECLIPSE” study, the findings were published in December, and indicate that 84.5% of Tremfya patients achieved a score of 90 or higher on the Psoriasis Area Severity Index; compared to only 70% of Cosentyx patients. However, Novartis claims those materials do not contain key information from that study, which would paint a much different safety profile.

Sports-Betting-Addiction-Lawsuits
Sports-Betting-Addiction-Lawsuits

“Janssen presented data from the ECLIPSE study in a false and misleading manner in at least two presentations at conferences within the past two months and is continuing to do so right now,” the complaint states. “In these presentations, Janssen made claims that its Tremfya product was both superior and noninferior to Novartis’s Cosentyx product, but did not present key safety information. Rather, it chose to cherry-pick among the adverse events that were recorded in the study.”

Novartis claims that slides presented at the conferences left out several adverse events linked to Tremfya, including heart problems and cancer risks. However, there is a slide that notes, in small print, that the information is not included.

The misrepresentation makes Novartis’s Cosentyx look less safe than Tremfya by comparison, the lawsuit notes.

The complaint calls for a temporary restraining order against Johnson & Johnson and Janssen, seeking to prevent them from publishing new marketing material that uses data from ECLIPSE to compare Tremfya and Cosentyx. It also calls for the companies to pull all of its currently misleading marketing materials comparing the two using data from the study from circulation.

In 2017, Tremfya sales were only $63 million. In 2018, they increased to $544 million in sales worldwide.

Written by: Irvin Jackson

Senior Legal Journalist & Contributing Editor

Irvin Jackson is a senior investigative reporter at AboutLawsuits.com with more than 30 years of experience covering mass tort litigation, environmental policy, and consumer safety. He previously served as Associate Editor at Inside the EPA and contributes original reporting on product liability lawsuits, regulatory failures, and nationwide litigation trends.




0 Comments


This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

Share Your Comments

This field is hidden when viewing the form
I authorize the above comments be posted on this page
Post Comment
Weekly Digest Opt-In

Want your comments reviewed by a lawyer?

To have an attorney review your comments and contact you about a potential case, provide your contact information below. This will not be published.

NOTE: Providing information for review by an attorney does not form an attorney-client relationship.

MORE TOP STORIES

Parties involved in a Dupixent T-cell lymphoma wrongful death lawsuit will participate in an initial status conference in early December, to map out how the litigation will move forward.
A group of plaintiffs are asking a panel of federal judges to consolidate all Lyft lawsuits involving driver sexual assaults against passengers before one judge as part of a Lyft MDL.
Federal regulators warned years ago that mesh implants were never approved for use in breast surgery, yet manufacturers continued marketing them as internal bra devices for reconstruction and cosmetic augmentation.