Skip Navigation

Truqap Side Effects Linked to Discontinuation Risks, FDA Staffers Warn

Truqap Side Effects Cause High Rate of Discontinuations, FDA Staffers Warn

Federal drug safety experts are warning that Truqap may expose prostate cancer patients to serious toxicity risks while offering limited treatment benefits.

Drug reviewers with the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) released a briefing document ahead of an April 30 meeting of the agency’s Oncologic Drugs Advisory Committee. The report comes as the committee prepares to weigh Truqap’s potential use in a new combination cancer treatment.

Truqap Approval

Truqap (capivasertib) was first approved by the FDA in 2023 as a breast cancer treatment, used in combination with fulvestrant for certain patients whose cancer has become metastatic, meaning it has spread to other parts of the body. AstraZeneca is now seeking FDA approval to expand use of the drug as a prostate cancer treatment, in combination with Johnson & Johnson’s Zytiga (abiraterone).

The request is being reviewed by an FDA advisory committee, which is made up of outside scientists, physicians and other health experts who evaluate drug approval questions and make recommendations to the agency. While the committee’s votes are not binding, the FDA often follows the advice of its advisory panels when deciding whether to approve new uses for medications.

Spinal-Cord-Stimulation-Lawsuit
Spinal-Cord-Stimulation-Lawsuit

Truqap Toxicity Risks

Before the meeting, FDA staffers submitted their own review of the drug, raising reservations about its safety and effectiveness as part of the prostate cancer treatment combo. The reviewers found the evidence of its effectiveness unconvincing, questioning the techniques researchers used during clinical trials to reach their conclusions.

One of the end goals of the clinical trials involved measuring the time between the end of treatment and the patient’s need for chemotherapy. However, reviewers noted that numerous factors which have nothing to do with the drug’s effectiveness could delay such treatments, including financial issues and chemotherapy drug availability.

The document points out that all similar prostate cancer medications showed signs of higher effectiveness before the agency approved them.

Additionally, the FDA raised concerns about Truqap’s level of toxicity, indicating that during a Truqap clinical trial patients took the drug for only 16.8 months, while those given placebos took them for 18.6 months. The researchers then compared the outcomes as if both groups had taken the medications for similar durations.

However, the reviewers noted that the reason the Truqap group had a shorter use duration overall was due to the large number of patients who discontinued the study due to adverse side effects. The drug’s application notes that these patients were generally able to continue taking Zytiga if they suffered adverse events from Truqap use.

“While the FDA agrees with the Applicant that treatment with capivasertib did not compromise exposure to abiraterone overall, the high discontinuation rate and shorter duration of exposure to capivasertib compared to placebo suggest that capivasertib was not well-tolerated.”

– Combined FDA and Applicant ODAC Briefing Document

In their summary, the FDA reviewers warned that the benefits of adding Truqap to Zytiga, which is an established and well-tolerated prostate cancer drug, could not be distinguished from the effects of Zytiga alone. 

Additionally, they warned that the risk of Truqap’s toxicity, which they say contributed to some patient deaths, needs to be considered in comparison to the seemingly small potential benefit.

Sign up for more legal news that could affect you or your family.

Irvin Jackson
Written By: Irvin Jackson

Senior Legal Journalist & Contributing Editor

Irvin Jackson is a senior investigative reporter at AboutLawsuits.com with more than 30 years of experience covering mass tort litigation, environmental policy, and consumer safety. He previously served as Associate Editor at Inside the EPA and contributes original reporting on product liability lawsuits, regulatory failures, and nationwide litigation trends.



0 Comments


This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

Share Your Comments

This field is hidden when viewing the form
I authorize the above comments be posted on this page
Post Comment
Weekly Digest Opt-In

Want your comments reviewed by a lawyer?

To have an attorney review your comments and contact you about a potential case, provide your contact information below. This will not be published.

NOTE: Providing information for review by an attorney does not form an attorney-client relationship.

MORE TOP STORIES

Women nationwide have begun filing GalaFLEX breast mesh lawsuits against BD, claiming they suffered pain, permanent injuries and the need for revision surgery after the implants were used off-label for breast reconstruction.
A Massachusetts man has filed an Ozempic vision loss lawsuit claiming the diabetes drug injections caused a condition that eroded his vision in both eyes.