Valsartan Bladder Cancer Lawsuit Filed Over Generic Drug Manufacturing Problems

Chemical impurities in recalled valsartan tablets caused a Massachusetts man to develop bladder cancer, according to a lawsuit filed against various manufacturers of the generic hypertension drug.

Jerold Lamhut filed the complaint (PDF) in the U.S. District Court for the District of New Jersey on June 14, indicating that he received contaminated valsartan pills for years, which contained known human carcinogens that were a byproduct of the drug manufacturing process.

The lawsuit names a number of different generic drug makers as defendants, including Zhejiang Huahai Pharmaceutical Co., Prinston Pharmaceutical, Inc., Solco Healthcare US, LLC, and Aurobindo Pharma. It also names Walmart and 100 unidentified individuals and companies.

Learn More About

Valsartan Lawsuits

Side effects of recalled valsartan may increase the risk of cancer, due to an impurity discovered in certain generic versions of the hypertension drug.

Learn More About this Lawsuit SEE IF YOU QUALIFY FOR COMPENSATION

Lamhut indicates that he received various different generic valsartan pills between May 2015 and May 2018, which it has since been discovered were contaminated with Nitroso-dimethylamine (NDMA), N-Nitrosodiethylamine (NDEA), or other nitrosamine compounds that are known to increase the risk of cancer. In July 2016, he was diagnosed with bladder cancer, which he alleges was a result of the valsartan pills.

Since July 2018, a series of generic valsartan recalls have been issued by different manufacturers due to the presence of NDMA and NDEA, which has contaminated much of the U.S. supply of the hypertension drug distributed in recent years.

According to the lawsuit, the various generic drug makers knew or should have known for years that their manufacturing processes could result in the byproduct contaminants, but did nothing and failed to warn either consumers, the medical community, or drug regulators.

“According to the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, even short-term exposure to NDEA can damage the liver in humans,” the lawsuit states. “Animal studies also demonstrate that chronic ingestion of NDEA can cause liver tumors and other types of tumors as well, including in the kidneys.”

The case joins a growing number of generic valsartan lawsuits filed in recent months by individuals who indicate they were left with a number of other types of cancer, including liver cancer, kidney cancer, gastric cancer, pancreatic cancer and other injuries following exposure to NDMA or NDEA.

In addition, a number of valsartan class action claims are pursuing damages for users of the medications who have not been diagnosed with cancer, but seek reimbursement for the cost of what were essentially worthless drugs, and funding for medical monitoring they may require for the rest of their lives due to their exposure to cancer-causing agents.

2 Comments

  • GeraldineApril 25, 2020 at 12:39 pm

    I have bladder cancer took valsartan and recalled had bladder out kidney and now spread.

  • RichardFebruary 9, 2020 at 9:58 pm

    I took Valsartan from 2016-2018 when it was recalled. I was diagnosed with bladder cancer five months after stopping the drug. I would like to look into if there is any legal action I can take them over this. Please contact me

Share Your Comments

I authorize the above comments be posted on this page*

Want your comments reviewed by a lawyer?

To have an attorney review your comments and contact you about a potential case, provide your contact information below. This will not be published.

NOTE: Providing information for review by an attorney does not form an attorney-client relationship.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

More Top Stories

Gardasil Lawsuits Over Failure To Warn Doctors About HPV Vaccine Risks Cleared To Move Forward
Gardasil Lawsuits Over Failure To Warn Doctors About HPV Vaccine Risks Cleared To Move Forward (Posted today)

A federal judge has cleared Gardasil lawsuits to move forward, after paring down plaintiffs' claims to those alleging Merck either failed to warn, or fraudulently concealed, the HPV vaccine's risks from the medical community.