Valturna Lawsuit Alleges Hypertension Drug Caused Kidney Failure

An Ohio woman has filed a product liability lawsuit alleging that she suffered kidney damage from Valturna, a hypertension drug that contains the active ingredient from the drug Tekturna.  

The complaint (PDF) was filed by Dottie Dodson in Superior Court of New Jersey in Morris County on April 5, alleging that Novartis AG failed to adequately warn about the potential side effects of Valturna before removing it from the market last year.

Dodson began taking Valturna in 2010, after previously taking a combination of Tekturna and Benicar. According to allegations raised in the Valturna lawsuit, the medication caused her to develop chronic kidney disease and end stage renal failure.

Did You Know?

Millions of Philips CPAP Machines Recalled

Philips DreamStation, CPAP and BiPAP machines sold in recent years may pose a risk of cancer, lung damage and other injuries.

Learn More

Novartis stopped marketing Valturna in July 2012, following studies that suggested a link between aliskiren, the active ingredient in Tekturna, and kidney disease. Valturna is a combination of aliskiren and valsartan, the later of which is sold under the brand name Diovan.

Last November, a study found that when Tekturna was combined with some other hypertension drugs, it may increase the risk of kidney disease and kidney damage. The study, known as ALTITUDE, was cancelled due to the high risk of injury to subjects involved in the study.

Researchers concluded that the combination of aliskiren with angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors and angiotensis II receptor blockers (ARBs) is dangerous for patients with Type 2 diabetes or chronic kidney disease. However, the risk may extend to other patients as well.

The FDA revised the warning label for Tekturna and similar drugs in February 2012, warning of potential kidney damage. Novartis then announced it would phase out Valturna by July 2012.

The lawsuit accuses Novartis of failing to properly test the drugs before they were placed on the market. The lawsuit alleges that the drug maker aggressively marketed Tekturna for heart failure and other cardiovascular problems.

Valturna, approved by the FDA in 2009, went on the market based on one eight-week clinical trial of just 1,800 patients, according to the lawsuit. In January, the Justice Department announced it was launching an investigation into potential Tekturna illegal marketing tactics by Novartis.

The lawsuit accuses Novartis of negligence, strict liability, breach of warranty, fraudulent concealment, and violating Ohio consumer protection laws. It seeks both compensatory and punitive damages.

Tekturna (aliskiren) was first approved in the United States in 2007 for the treatment of hypertension. Other drugs that contain aliskiren include Amturnide and Tekamlo. There were about 2.4 million prescriptions filled for aliskiren-containing drugs in 2011 in the United States, according to the FDA.

Image Credit: |

0 Comments

Share Your Comments

I authorize the above comments be posted on this page*

Want your comments reviewed by a lawyer?

To have an attorney review your comments and contact you about a potential case, provide your contact information below. This will not be published.

NOTE: Providing information for review by an attorney does not form an attorney-client relationship.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

More Top Stories

AT&T Data Breach Lawsuits Seek Damages for 70M Customers Whose Information Was Released
AT&T Data Breach Lawsuits Seek Damages for 70M Customers Whose Information Was Released (Posted yesterday)

AT&T faces a growing number of data breach class action lawsuits, which plaintiffs say should be consolidated before one federal judge for coordinated pretrial proceedings.

Fairness of Philips CPAP Recall Settlement Being Evaluated By MDL Judge
Fairness of Philips CPAP Recall Settlement Being Evaluated By MDL Judge (Posted 2 days ago)

A federal judge has held a fairness hearing for a proposed Philips CPAP class action lawsuit settlement, which seeks to resolve claims that consumers suffered economic damages due to the massive recall over toxic sound abatement foam.