Ventralex Lawsuit Alleges Defective Bard Hernia Mesh Had To Be Surgically Removed

According to allegations raised in a product liability lawsuit filed C.R. Bard, problems with Ventralex hernia mesh resulted in serious complications and the need for hernia revision surgery years after the patch was implanted.

The complaint (PDF) was filed last month by James Keaulana and his wife, Eileen, in the U.S. District Court for the District of Hawaii, indicating that the design of the polypropylene mesh was defective and posed severe risks for patients.

James Keaulana underwent epigrastric hernia repair in October 2010, at which time he was implanted with a Davol Mesh Ventralex Patch. However, after the hernia repair failed, he had to undergo revision surgery in November 2018.

Is there a hernia mesh lawsuit? Find out if you qualify for a hernia mesh lawsuit settlement payout.
Is there a hernia mesh lawsuit? Find out if you qualify for a hernia mesh lawsuit settlement payout.

The lawsuit blames the problems on the materials used in the Ventralex patch design, which consists of two layers of polypropylene mesh stitched together with polytetrafluorethylene monofilament.

“Despite Defendants’ claims that this material is inert, a substantial body of scientific evidence shows that the mesh material is biologically incompatible with human tissue and promotes an immune response in a large subset of the population receiving the product,” Keaulana’s lawsuit states. “This immune response promotes degradation and contracture of the polypropylene mesh, as well as the surrounding tissue, and can contribute to the formation of severe adverse reactions to the mesh.”

Keaulana indicates that Bard failed to provide adequate warnings about those risks to patients or the medical community, joining a growing number of hernia mesh lawsuits filed against the manufacturer nationwide, each raising similar allegations of design problems associated with various products sold in recent years.

The complaint will be consolidated with other claims pending in the federal court system against Bard, which are currently centralized as part of a federal MDL (multidistrict litigation) in the Southern District of Ohio, where one judge is presiding over coordinated discovery and pretrial proceedings.

There are currently more than 3,500 product liability lawsuits pending against C.R. Bard in a federal multidistrict litigation (MDL), involving painful and debilitating complications following hernia repairs with Bard Ventralex, Bard Perfix, Bard Composix and other polypropylene products.

Written by: Irvin Jackson

Senior Legal Journalist & Contributing Editor

Irvin Jackson is a senior investigative reporter at AboutLawsuits.com with more than 30 years of experience covering mass tort litigation, environmental policy, and consumer safety. He previously served as Associate Editor at Inside the EPA and contributes original reporting on product liability lawsuits, regulatory failures, and nationwide litigation trends.




0 Comments


This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

Share Your Comments

This field is hidden when viewing the form
I authorize the above comments be posted on this page
Post Comment
Weekly Digest Opt-In

Want your comments reviewed by a lawyer?

To have an attorney review your comments and contact you about a potential case, provide your contact information below. This will not be published.

NOTE: Providing information for review by an attorney does not form an attorney-client relationship.

MORE TOP STORIES

Federal indictments against MLB and NBA players reveal how legalized sports betting has blurred the line between competition and addiction, fueling corruption on the field and lawsuits off it.
A California woman had to undergo brain surgery to remove a tumor she says was caused by Depo-Provera side effects, according to a recently filed lawsuit.
Recall notices are being sent to Amazon customers who purchased tabletop fire pits linked to severe burn injuries, as lawsuits continue to mount against the company and other manufacturers over the allegedly defective and dangerous products.