Viking Range Problems Result in Settlement for $4.65M with CPSC Over Defective Ranges

Federal consumer safety officials report that Viking Range has agreed to pay $4.65 million in civil penalties to resolve charges that it failed to report serious problems with some of its gas ranges. 

The U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission (CPSC) issued a press release on April 13, announcing that it has voted to accept a Viking Range settlement agreement (PDF), which resolves charges that the oven manufacturer failed to properly report problems with gas ranges that resulted in burns and property damage.

In May 2015, Viking announced a gas range recall following at least 75 reports of the stoves’ burners turning on by themselves when the control knobs were set to the “off” position.

Sports-Betting-Addiction-Lawsuits
Sports-Betting-Addiction-Lawsuits

The recall affected about 60,000 ovens in the U.S. and Canada, and were linked to at least three burn injuries and four reports of property damage. However, according to the U.S. CPSC, an investigation revealed that Viking received about 170 incident reports from 2008 to 2014 on the same problem, but failed to report those complaints to the CPSC.

“The reported incidents included two consumers who were unable to turn off the range using the controls and were burned while attempting to disconnect the power source. Viking also received five reports that the ranges had turned on spontaneously and caused property damage to the area surrounding the range,” the CPSC noted. “Several consumers called 911 for assistance when they discovered that the ranges had turned on spontaneously and could not be turned off or disconnected. Viking knew of this information, but failed to notify CPSC immediately of the defect or risk posed by the ranges, as required by federal law.”

The CPSC found that Viking collected and tested some ranges and developed a repair, then issued a number of engineering change orders and technical bulletins that detailed how to fix the problem, but despite this did not warn the CPSC until July 2014. It would be another year before the devices were pulled from the market.

The settlement agreement includes a $4.65 million civil penalty, an agreement to initiate an enhanced compliance program as well as new internal controls and procedures. The CPSC agreed to accept the terms of the settlement in a 4-1 vote, with one member voting to accept a lower penalty fee.

The settlement agreement did not include an admission of guilt.

Written by: Irvin Jackson

Senior Legal Journalist & Contributing Editor

Irvin Jackson is a senior investigative reporter at AboutLawsuits.com with more than 30 years of experience covering mass tort litigation, environmental policy, and consumer safety. He previously served as Associate Editor at Inside the EPA and contributes original reporting on product liability lawsuits, regulatory failures, and nationwide litigation trends.




2 Comments


Jacque
Can Viking be held liable for selling their stoves and now have discontinued the parts.?

Janet
Purchased our home in 2011. Our kitchen had a beautiful Viking oven. We were thrilled! However it’s never worked properly. After several repair attempts with little available techs having knowledge of Viking just coming out and staring at it.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

Share Your Comments

This field is hidden when viewing the form
I authorize the above comments be posted on this page
Post Comment
Weekly Digest Opt-In

Want your comments reviewed by a lawyer?

To have an attorney review your comments and contact you about a potential case, provide your contact information below. This will not be published.

NOTE: Providing information for review by an attorney does not form an attorney-client relationship.

MORE TOP STORIES

Parties involved in a Dupixent T-cell lymphoma wrongful death lawsuit will participate in an initial status conference in early December, to map out how the litigation will move forward.
A group of plaintiffs are asking a panel of federal judges to consolidate all Lyft lawsuits involving driver sexual assaults against passengers before one judge as part of a Lyft MDL.
Federal regulators warned years ago that mesh implants were never approved for use in breast surgery, yet manufacturers continued marketing them as internal bra devices for reconstruction and cosmetic augmentation.