Sports Betting Addiction Lawsuit Sports betting addiction lawsuits are being investigated for college students and young adults who developed gambling problems after using apps like FanDuel and DraftKings, alleging that the platforms failed to warn about the addictive nature of their features and marketing practices.
Nitrous Oxide Lawsuit Individuals who suffered harm, or families who lost a loved one after using nitrous oxide products may be eligible for financial compensation through a nitrous oxide lawsuit.
Hair Relaxer Lawsuit Regular exposure to chemicals in hair relaxer may cause uterine cancer, ovarian cancer and other injuries. Women diagnosed with cancer may be eligible for settlement benefits.
Depo-Provera Lawsuit Depo-Provera lawsuits are being investigated for women who developed meningioma brain tumors after receiving Depo-Provera birth control shots, claiming that Pfizer failed to adequately disclose side effects.
Ozempic Lawsuit Lawyers are pursuing Ozempic lawsuits, Wegovy lawsuits and Mounjaro lawsuits over gastroparesis or stomach paralysis, which can leave users with long-term gastrointestinal side effects
Suboxone Tooth Decay Lawsuit Lawsuits are being pursued by users of Suboxone who experienced tooth loss, broken teeth or required dental extractions. Settlement benefits may be available.
Change Healthcare Lawsuit Lawyers are reviewing Change Healthcare class action lawsuits for individuals who had their personal information stolen due to the data breach.
Bard PowerPort Lawsuit Serious and life-threatening injuries have been linked to problems with Bard PowerPort. Lawsuits are now being pursued by individuals who suffered injuries from the implantable port catheter fracturing or migrating.
AngioDynamics Port Catheter Lawsuit Serious and life-threatening injuries have been linked to problems with Bard PowerPort. Lawsuits are now being pursued by individuals who suffered injuries from the implantable port catheter fracturing or migrating.
Processed Food Lawsuit Lawsuits are being pursued against the food industry over their manufacturing and advertising of ultra-processed foods, which have caused a generation of children to face an increased risk of developing childhood diabetes and other chronic illnesses.
Zen Magnet And Neoballs Toy Magnets Ban Declared, “Substantial Product Hazard” CPSC Rules November 7, 2017 Irvin Jackson Add Your Comments Federal regulators have determined that adult desk toys marketed as “Zen Magnets” and “Neoballs” pose a substantial risk for consumers, banning the rare-earth magnet sets. The U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission (CPSC) announced a Final Decision and Order (PDF) on November 3, which makes the sale of the toy magnet sets illegal in the United States. The decision was issued on October 26, coming after a long legal battle between the makers of Zen Magnets and the CPSC, which indicates that the small magnets pose a health threat to children, as they can attract inside the body if more than two magnets are ingested or placed in the nose. Do You Know about… SPORTS BETTING ADDICTION LAWSUITS FOR YOUNG ADULTS Gambling addiction and severe financial losses have been linked to popular sports betting platforms like DraftKings, FanDuel, and Caesars. Lawsuits are being filed by young adults and students who were targeted by deceptive promotions, addictive app features, and aggressive marketing tactics. See if you qualify for a sports betting addiction lawsuit. Learn More SEE IF YOU QUALIFY FOR COMPENSATION Do You Know About… SPORTS BETTING ADDICTION LAWSUITS FOR YOUNG ADULTS Gambling addiction and severe financial losses have been linked to popular sports betting platforms like DraftKings, FanDuel, and Caesars. Lawsuits are being filed by young adults and students who were targeted by deceptive promotions, addictive app features, and aggressive marketing tactics. See if you qualify for a sports betting addiction lawsuit. Learn More SEE IF YOU QUALIFY FOR COMPENSATION “In issuing the Final Decision and Order, CPSC Commissioners Marietta S. Robinson, Robert S. Adler and Elliot F. Kaye held that Zen Magnets are defective, that the defect creates a substantial risk of injury to the public, and that warnings do not mitigate the risk,” the CPSC press release states. “The Commission held that it is reasonably foreseeable that children will ingest Zen Magnets.” Zen Magnets and Neoballs are both made and distributed by Zen Magnets, LLC. According to a magnet information center website published by the CPSC, nearly 3,000 children and teenagers swallowed the magnets and had to be treated in emergency rooms nationwide between 2009 and 2013, including the death of a 19-month girl, Annaka Chaffin, after accidentally swallowing the magnets. Amid growing concerns over the popular rare earth magnet sets sold by Zen Magnets and other manufacturers, the CPSC enacted new safety standards for the toy magnet sets several years ago, which Zen Magnets fought aggressively in court. In November 2016, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit issued a 2-1 ruling, which found that the U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission (CPSC) banned small toy magnets without sufficient evidence that they carried a large enough risk to children. The toy magnet safety rules, enacted in October 2014, came after several battles with manufacturers to get them to recall products after the CPSC determined that warnings provided were insufficient to avoid injuries. Zen Magnets, LLC, protested the new rules, and challenged them in court. The latest ruling sets aside a March 2016 administrative law judge’s determination that the products were not a substantial product hazard. It also claims that the CPSC now has the preponderance of evidence necessary to enact the ban. “The evidence clearly shows that there were two incidents in which we know specifically that the Subject Products were associated with two serious injuries,” the order notes, referencing a procedure where doctors had to remove a 14-year-old girl’s colon, appendix and part of her intestines after she ingested two magnets; and an incident where doctors had to resect several parts of a 15-month-old’s small bowel after the child ingested both magnets and button batteries. The CPSC also noted that there were reports on at least 95 magnet ingestion incident reports involving similar products. The commission also knew of clinical data on 123 ingestion incidents, and a survey that revealed “hundreds of incidents” involving small rare earth magnets that were physically and functionally equivalent to those made by Zen Magnets. The CPSC indicates that the injuries were difficult to diagnose, which often led to more damage as the magnets connected and tore through the gastrointestinal system, and involved invasive procedures that often resulted in children losing parts of their bowels, colon and other parts of the digestive tract, which is sometimes the only way to get the powerful magnets out. CPSC Chair Disagrees With Some Parts of Magnet Decision A separate opinion (PDF) issued by Anne Marie Buerkle, acting CPSC chair, concurred in part with the decision, but disagreed with some parts. She disagreed with the decision to deem the magnets defective, as swallowing the magnets is a misuse of the toys and not a planned use. She noted that the regulations to classify a product as defective are based on problems that occur when it is used as directed. However, Buerkle noted that consumer misuse may be considered in determining the injury risk of a product and agreed with the commission’s decision to recall a portion of the magnets. The decision came just a month after Zen Magnets filed a petition calling for the CPSC to establish new toy magnet rules. However, Zen Magnets proposed that those rules only applied to products directly marketed to children. The company has long held that its magnet sets, which many saw as toys, were not, in fact, toys, and were meant for adults. It also calls for warnings and instructional requirements designed to inform consumers that they are not to be used by children, and that they should carry age recommendations of 14 years and older. If enacted as such, it would allow many of the manufacturers shut down by the CPSC to produce magnet sets that many critics say would be dangerous and would still attract children and result in severe injuries and deaths. The CPSC has long said that such warnings do not appear to be effective in preventing child magnet injuries. However, the most recent CPSC decision, almost certain to be challenged by Zen Magnets, undercuts the need for such a rule, making it illegal by federal law for Zen Magnets or Neoballs to be sold within, or imported to, the United States. Zen Magnets has 30 days to submit a plan to the commission that includes a refund for consumers and a notice to the public. Tags: Children, Children Death, Magnets, Neoballs, Zen Magnets More Lawsuit Stories Over 550 Depo-Provera Lawsuits Being Pursued by Women With Meningioma Brain Tumors July 15, 2025 Judge Rejects Uber’s Attempt To Dismiss All Driver Sex Assault Bellwether Lawsuits July 15, 2025 Nursing Home Staffing Problems Worsening Amid Immigration Crackdowns: AP Report July 15, 2025 1 Comments EDWARD December 6, 2020 So some people can’t use enough common sense to keep small objects away from children so they want to ban a product. What else is new. Share Your CommentsFirst Name*Last NameEmail* Shared Comments*This field is hidden when viewing the formI authorize the above comments be posted on this page Yes No Post Comment I authorize the above comments be posted on this page Weekly Digest Opt-In Yes, send me a weekly email with the latest lawsuits, recalls and warnings. Want your comments reviewed by a lawyer?To have an attorney review your comments and contact you about a potential case, provide your contact information below. This will not be published.Contact Phone #Alt Phone #Private CommentsNOTE: Providing information for review by an attorney does not form an attorney-client relationship.CAPTCHAGA SourceGA CampaignGA MediumGA ContentGA TermPhoneThis field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged. Δ MORE TOP STORIES Over 550 Depo-Provera Lawsuits Being Pursued by Women With Meningioma Brain Tumors (Posted: today) As the Depo-Provera MDL moves toward its first jury trials, the litigation has reached a key milestone, with more than 550 lawsuits filed over brain tumor injuries linked to the birth control injection. MORE ABOUT: DEPO-PROVERA LAWSUITDepo-Provera Shots Triple Brain Tumor Risks Compared to Birth Control Pill: Study (07/11/2025)Depo-Provera Lawsuit Pre-Settlement Funding and Loans Must Be Disclosed Under Court Order (07/09/2025)Depo-Provera Wrongful Death Lawsuit Blames Injections for Fatal Brain Tumor (07/02/2025) Suboxone Injury Lawyers Reappointed to Leadership Roles in Federal MDL (Posted: yesterday) A federal judge has confirmed the reappointment of more than two dozen Suboxone injury lawyers to serve in leadership positions representing plaintiffs for another year. MORE ABOUT: SUBOXONE TOOTH DECAY LAWSUITGas Station Heroin Class Action Lawsuit Filed Over Addictive Properties of ZaZa Supplements (07/03/2025)Lawyers To Select 50 Suboxone Dental Lawsuits for Next Phase of MDL Bellwether Discovery (05/22/2025)500 Suboxone Tooth Decay Cases Randomly Selected for Bellwether Record Collection Pool (04/24/2025) Uber Faces Lawsuit Indicating Driver Raped Passenger After Using Wife’s Account (Posted: 5 days ago) A lawsuit filed by a Florida woman says she was raped after an Uber driver’s husband showed up behind the wheel. MORE ABOUT: UBER SEXUAL ASSAULT LAWSUITJudge Rejects Uber’s Attempt To Dismiss All Driver Sex Assault Bellwether Lawsuits (07/15/2025)Uber Driver Background Check Materials Must Be Produced in Sexual Assault Lawsuits: Court (06/17/2025)MDL Judge Updated on Uber Driver Sex Assault Lawsuit Status as Claims Top 2,800 (06/06/2025)
Over 550 Depo-Provera Lawsuits Being Pursued by Women With Meningioma Brain Tumors (Posted: today) As the Depo-Provera MDL moves toward its first jury trials, the litigation has reached a key milestone, with more than 550 lawsuits filed over brain tumor injuries linked to the birth control injection. MORE ABOUT: DEPO-PROVERA LAWSUITDepo-Provera Shots Triple Brain Tumor Risks Compared to Birth Control Pill: Study (07/11/2025)Depo-Provera Lawsuit Pre-Settlement Funding and Loans Must Be Disclosed Under Court Order (07/09/2025)Depo-Provera Wrongful Death Lawsuit Blames Injections for Fatal Brain Tumor (07/02/2025)
Suboxone Injury Lawyers Reappointed to Leadership Roles in Federal MDL (Posted: yesterday) A federal judge has confirmed the reappointment of more than two dozen Suboxone injury lawyers to serve in leadership positions representing plaintiffs for another year. MORE ABOUT: SUBOXONE TOOTH DECAY LAWSUITGas Station Heroin Class Action Lawsuit Filed Over Addictive Properties of ZaZa Supplements (07/03/2025)Lawyers To Select 50 Suboxone Dental Lawsuits for Next Phase of MDL Bellwether Discovery (05/22/2025)500 Suboxone Tooth Decay Cases Randomly Selected for Bellwether Record Collection Pool (04/24/2025)
Uber Faces Lawsuit Indicating Driver Raped Passenger After Using Wife’s Account (Posted: 5 days ago) A lawsuit filed by a Florida woman says she was raped after an Uber driver’s husband showed up behind the wheel. MORE ABOUT: UBER SEXUAL ASSAULT LAWSUITJudge Rejects Uber’s Attempt To Dismiss All Driver Sex Assault Bellwether Lawsuits (07/15/2025)Uber Driver Background Check Materials Must Be Produced in Sexual Assault Lawsuits: Court (06/17/2025)MDL Judge Updated on Uber Driver Sex Assault Lawsuit Status as Claims Top 2,800 (06/06/2025)