Zilmax Feed Additive Sales Halted Amid Cattle Problems

|

Following recent concerns about the effects of Zilmax feed additive on cattle, Merck has halted sales of the product pending further investigation.

In a statement issued Frida, Merck & Co. announced that sales of the widely popular animal feed additive Zilmax will be suspended.

The decision comes after an earlier statement on August 8, where the drug maker announced that it will launch an internal study into the risk of cattle problems from Zilmax, after reports surfaced that suggested the additive may cause lameness in some animals.

Spinal-Cord-Stimulation-Lawsuit
Spinal-Cord-Stimulation-Lawsuit

Zilmax is a popular beta-agonist, a class of drugs used to add weight to cattle, pigs and turkey before slaughter. It is given to the animal for only 20 days, but Merck reports the product increases carcass weight by 24 to 33 pounds, while improving tenderness and flavor in the beef.

Tyson Foods, the nationโ€™s largest meat processor, recently announced that it will no longer accept beef from cattle treated with Zilmax. The decision came after cattle that had been given Zilmax were observed having difficulty walking and moving. The company says the final decision was based on animal welfare; however many industry experts point to Zilmax as the cause.

Amid the cattle problems, Zilmax sales will temporarily be halted in the United States and Canada, offering Merck time to conduct the study of the beef additive. Merck plans to establish study protocols, identify feeders and packers to participate in the study which will be overseen from the โ€œfeed yard to the packing plant.โ€ The company also said it plans to create a third party team to validate the results of the study.

The company continues to maintain that Zilmax is safe, citing 30 studies since 2007 which validate itโ€™s safety. The FDA will work with Merck along with the U.S. Department of Agriculture to help determine the safety of the product.

Livestock analysts were surprised by Merckโ€™s decision, considering that the companyโ€™s earlier announcement about the intention to further study the product did not include a plan to stop sales. Merckโ€™s decision may have come as a result of the slew of recent bad press concerning Zilmax and itโ€™s side effects on animals.

Following Tysonโ€™s announcement, JBS USA, a large U.S. Cattle processor, released a video of cattle exhibiting the same signs of lameness that Tyson reported. The video shows cattle having difficulty walking after being fed beta-agonist additives.

Analysts say the Zilmax cutback could result in a reduced supply of beef starting in the fall; however beef producers and livestock analysts say they do not expect significant changes. They anticipate companies currently using Zilmax will switch to Optaflexx. Optaflexx is a less potent beta-agonist sold by Eli Lilly and Coโ€™s Elanco animal health unit. It is less effective at adding weight to animals than Zilmax.

Cargill, the third largest meat producer and major rival to Tyson Foods, said they will continue to buy cattle fed Optaflexx, calling Merckโ€™s decision to halt Zilmax sales โ€œprudent.โ€

Analysts predict the halt of Zilmax sales could result in a one percent drop in the production of beef in the U.S. Sales of Zilmax reached nearly $160 million last year alone.

Martha Garcia
Written by: Martha Garcia

Health & Medical Research Writer

Martha Garcia is a health and medical research writer at AboutLawsuits.com with over 15 years of experience covering peer-reviewed studies and emerging public health risks. She previously led content strategy at The Blogsmith and contributes original reporting on drug safety, medical research, and health trends impacting consumers.

Image Credit: |



0 Comments


This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

Share Your Comments

This field is hidden when viewing the form
I authorize the above comments be posted on this page
Post Comment
Weekly Digest Opt-In

Want your comments reviewed by a lawyer?

To have an attorney review your comments and contact you about a potential case, provide your contact information below. This will not be published.

NOTE: Providing information for review by an attorney does not form an attorney-client relationship.

MORE TOP STORIES

According to a lawsuit brought against the manufacturer and the FDA, an Abbott Eterna spinal cord stimulator has caused pain, shocks and complications instead of the relief promised.