Zimmer Kinectiv Hip Lawsuit Filed Over Metallosis, Revision Surgery

According to allegations raised in a product liability lawsuit, the Zimmer Kinectiv Hip System is defectively designed, causing a Minnesota woman to develop metallosis blood poisoning and the need for revision surgery a few years after receiving the hip replacement. 

The complaint (PDF) was filed by Judith and Samuel Harms in the U.S. District Court for the District of Minnesota on May 19, indicating that the the head-neck taper junction of the Zimmer Kinectiv hip is prone to fret and wear down, releasing metallic debris into the body.

Judith Harms had a Zimmer Kinectiv hip implanted in September 2008, during a left total hip replacement. As a result of problems with the metal-on-metal hip implant, Harms suffered complications associated with a form of metal blood poisoning, known as metallosis, which resulted in the need for a left hip revision surgery in October 2015.

Learn More About

Hip Replacements Lawsuits

Lawsuits are being reviewed for several different dangerous and defective hip replacement systems.

Learn More About this Lawsuit See If You Qualify For A Settlement

“Diagnosis of the metallosis was delayed due to Plaintiff’s surgeon having been left uninformed of the potential for this risk and complication when using the Kinective Hip System,” the lawsuit states. “The October 2015 revision surgery revealed pericapsular necrotic tissue, thickened capsule and a brown metallic stained fluid in the area of the hip device. Black sludge was identified where the Zimmer metal head was disimpacted from the Zimmer neck.”

Harms’ lawsuit comes a little more than a year after Zimmer was ordered to pay $2 million to a man who also suffered metallosis due to similar problems with a Zimmer Kinectiv hip.

In recent years, a number of hip replacement recalls and problems have been associated with metal-on-metal designs. In addition, some concerns have been raised about the development of tumors and a potential risk of cancer that may be associated with the design.

Similar allegations were raised in nearly 12,000 DePuy ASR hip lawsuits filed against Johnson & Johnson, after their metal-on-metal implant was recalled in August 2010. Following several bellwether trials, the manufacturer ultimately agreed to pay more than $2.4 billion to settle the DePuy ASR litigation.

Other metal-on-metal hip replacement lawsuits have also been filed over similar designs, including the DePuy PinnacleBiomet Magnum and others.

More recently, a growing number of claims have followed a Stryker LFit V40 recall issued due to a high rate of problems experienced by individuals who received the femoral head used in various different types of hip systems, including Stryker Accolade, Stryker Meridian, Stryker Citation and other implants.


"*" indicates required fields

Share Your Comments

I authorize the above comments be posted on this page*

Have Your Comments Reviewed by a Lawyer

Provide additional contact information if you want an attorney to review your comments and contact you about a potential case. This information will not be published.

NOTE: Providing information for review by an attorney does not form an attorney-client relationship.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

More Top Stories

Bard Argues Hernia Mesh Lawsuits Previously Selected for Bellwether Trials Are No Longer
Bard Argues Hernia Mesh Lawsuits Previously Selected for Bellwether Trials Are No Longer "Representative" (Posted 2 days ago)

Bard claims two cases selected for the third and fourth bellwether trials are no longer representative of the litigation due to the plaintiffs' worsening injuries and need for additional surgeries due to their failed hernia mesh products.