Order Sought for 5-Hour Energy Drink Makers to Turn Over Complete Files

|

Several states attorneys general say the makers of 5-Hour Energy are withholding vital information that is necessary for an ongoing investigation into whether the popular energy shots are safe. ย 

Oregon Attorney General Ellen Rosenblum filed a petition last month in Multnomah County Circuit Court calling for an order that would force Living Essentials, LLC, the marketer of 5-Hour Energy, to hand over complete documents that the attorney general’s office has been requested since January 2013. The energy drink maker countered days later by asking another judge to set the demand aside.

The documents are part of a 33-state investigation into the safety and marketing claims of 5-Hour Energy. According to Rosenblum, the company has only handed over redacted documents that exclude vital information relevant to the investigation.

Spinal-Cord-Stimulation-Lawsuit
Spinal-Cord-Stimulation-Lawsuit

The makers of 5 Hour Energy claims that the only data it has failed to provide is proprietary information regarding the amounts of certain ingredients contained in the products, arguing that release of that information could benefit competitors. Rosenblum says the company does not have that option in the face of a multi-state investigation.

5-Hour Energy is a popular energy drink distributed by Innovation Ventures, LLC, which does business as Living Essentials. The product is categorized as a dietary supplement, meaning that the manufacturer has been able to avoid FDA regulation and sell the product without disclosing details on what is contained in the energy drink shot.

Marketing statements made by the manufacturer indicate that 5 Hour Energy provides โ€œhours of energy now โ€“ no crash later,โ€ suggesting that users will not experience the sudden drop in energy that is typically associated with other high-caffeine energy drink products. According to National Advertising Division (NAD), part of the Council of Better Business Bureaus, there is data that disproves the claim, which is at least five years old.

There are currently at least nine 5 Hour Energy lawsuits filed against Living Essentials filed in eight U.S. District Courts. All of the complaints involve similar allegations that Living Essentials practiced deceptive and unlawful advertising and marketing of 5-Hour Energy.

The energy drink industry has come under increased scrutiny over the past year, as concerns mount about the potentialย health risks associated with energy drink productsย and various marketing claims that encourage young users to consume large quantities of the highly caffeinated beverages.

According to information released by the FDA, there have been at least 13ย deaths linked to 5 Hour Energy Shots.

Irvin Jackson
Written by: Irvin Jackson

Senior Legal Journalist & Contributing Editor

Irvin Jackson is a senior investigative reporter at AboutLawsuits.com with more than 30 years of experience covering mass tort litigation, environmental policy, and consumer safety. He previously served as Associate Editor at Inside the EPA and contributes original reporting on product liability lawsuits, regulatory failures, and nationwide litigation trends.

Image Credit: |



0 Comments


This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

Share Your Comments

This field is hidden when viewing the form
I authorize the above comments be posted on this page
Post Comment
Weekly Digest Opt-In

Want your comments reviewed by a lawyer?

To have an attorney review your comments and contact you about a potential case, provide your contact information below. This will not be published.

NOTE: Providing information for review by an attorney does not form an attorney-client relationship.

MORE TOP STORIES

A Depo-Provera intracranial meningioma lawsuit claims Pfizer developed and sold a defective birth control injection that puts women at a five times increased risk of brain tumors.
A lawsuit alleges an Illinois woman developed CTCL after using Dupixent, raising concerns the manufacturer may have withheld concerns that the drug could contribute to cancer.
FanDuel and DraftKings face a sportsbook class action lawsuit alleging they intentionally promote their sites in a way that causes severe economic and emotional harm.