Sports Betting Addiction Lawsuit Sports betting addiction lawsuits are being investigated for college students and young adults who developed gambling problems after using apps like FanDuel and DraftKings, alleging that the platforms failed to warn about the addictive nature of their features and marketing practices.
Nitrous Oxide Lawsuit Individuals who suffered harm, or families who lost a loved one after using nitrous oxide products may be eligible for financial compensation through a nitrous oxide lawsuit.
Hair Relaxer Lawsuit Regular exposure to chemicals in hair relaxer may cause uterine cancer, ovarian cancer and other injuries. Women diagnosed with cancer may be eligible for settlement benefits.
Depo-Provera Lawsuit Depo-Provera lawsuits are being investigated for women who developed meningioma brain tumors after receiving Depo-Provera birth control shots, claiming that Pfizer failed to adequately disclose side effects.
Ozempic Lawsuit Lawyers are pursuing Ozempic lawsuits, Wegovy lawsuits and Mounjaro lawsuits over gastroparesis or stomach paralysis, which can leave users with long-term gastrointestinal side effects
Suboxone Tooth Decay Lawsuit Lawsuits are being pursued by users of Suboxone who experienced tooth loss, broken teeth or required dental extractions. Settlement benefits may be available.
Change Healthcare Lawsuit Lawyers are reviewing Change Healthcare class action lawsuits for individuals who had their personal information stolen due to the data breach.
Bard PowerPort Lawsuit Serious and life-threatening injuries have been linked to problems with Bard PowerPort. Lawsuits are now being pursued by individuals who suffered injuries from the implantable port catheter fracturing or migrating.
AngioDynamics Port Catheter Lawsuit Serious and life-threatening injuries have been linked to problems with Bard PowerPort. Lawsuits are now being pursued by individuals who suffered injuries from the implantable port catheter fracturing or migrating.
Processed Food Lawsuit Lawsuits are being pursued against the food industry over their manufacturing and advertising of ultra-processed foods, which have caused a generation of children to face an increased risk of developing childhood diabetes and other chronic illnesses.
Generic Drug Label Rules May Be Changed, Eliminating Preemption February 13, 2013 Irvin Jackson Add Your Comments Federal regulators are considering new rules regarding generic drug warning labels, which could reverse the effects of a recent Supreme Court ruling that has essentially provided manufacturers immunity from lawsuits over the failure to warn about potential side effects associated with generic medications they manufacture and sell. In 2011, a split Supreme Court decision in Pliva v. Mensing ruled that generic drug makers can not be held liable for failing to provide proper safety warnings, as long as the labels on medications they sell match the original brand name drug. Known as preemption, the Supreme Court found that federal rules requiring generic drug warnings to match brand name labels made it impossible for manufacturers to provide updated warnings, even if they knew the labels did not adequately disclose the risks associated with the medication. Do You Know about… SPORTS BETTING ADDICTION LAWSUITS FOR YOUNG ADULTS Gambling addiction and severe financial losses have been linked to popular sports betting platforms like DraftKings, FanDuel, and Caesars. Lawsuits are being filed by young adults and students who were targeted by deceptive promotions, addictive app features, and aggressive marketing tactics. See if you qualify for a sports betting addiction lawsuit. Learn More SEE IF YOU QUALIFY FOR COMPENSATION Do You Know About… SPORTS BETTING ADDICTION LAWSUITS FOR YOUNG ADULTS Gambling addiction and severe financial losses have been linked to popular sports betting platforms like DraftKings, FanDuel, and Caesars. Lawsuits are being filed by young adults and students who were targeted by deceptive promotions, addictive app features, and aggressive marketing tactics. See if you qualify for a sports betting addiction lawsuit. Learn More SEE IF YOU QUALIFY FOR COMPENSATION As a result of the decision, consumers have been left without a source of recovery, as they could not bring a claim against the name-brand manufacturer since they never used their product and the generic drug maker could avoid all liability by arguing that they had to match the branded version. Over past two years, courts across the country have dismissed cases involving injuries caused by generic equivalents of Reglan, Accutane, Fosamax and other drugs that have been linked to serious side effects that were not adequately disclosed on the warning label. The majority opinion in Mensing noted that the Supreme Court’s ruling appeared unfair and perhaps even nonsensical, indicating that the FDA or Congress could change the generic label requirements to solve the issue. In a January 2013 amicus brief (PDF) filed by the government in another drug case being reviewed by the Supreme Court, Mutual Pharmaceutical v. Bartlett, a footnote indicates that the FDA is considering the creation of new rules that would make generic drug makers responsible for providing adequate warnings. The footnote reads: “This Office has been informed that FDA is considering a regulatory change that would allow generic manufacturers, like brand-name manufacturers, to change their labeling in appropriate circumstances. If such a regulatory change is adopted, it could eliminate preemption of failure-to-warn claims against generic-drug manufacturers.” The change may allow consumers to once again hold generic drug makers responsible for damages caused when they provide misleading or inaccurate information about potential risks that are caused by medications. However, there is no indication as to what the FDA’s final rules will look like, and concerns have been raised in the industry that it could result in different warning labels for the same generic drug when made by different manufacturers, which could confuse doctors and patients. The Barlett case, where the rule consideration was mentioned, involves the ability of plaintiffs to file personal injury lawsuits against generic drug makers. Generic pharmaceutical companies argue that the Mensing ruling should be a large umbrella precedent, shields the companies them from personal injury claims as well as failure to warn lawsuits, hoping to reverse a following a $21 million personal injury jury award issued to Karen Bartlett of New Hampshire. Barlett suffered Stevens-Johnson Syndrome and toxic epidermal necrolysis after taking Sulindac, a generic version of the anti-inflammatory drug Clinoril. She was blinded and permanently injured by the severe skin reactions. Tags: Generic Drug, Side Effects, Stevens-Johnson Syndrome, Supreme Court, Toxic Epidermal Necrolysis More Lawsuit Stories Depo-Provera Wrongful Death Lawsuit Blames Injections for Fatal Brain Tumor July 2, 2025 Nitrous Oxide Side Effects From Long-Term Use Linked to Paralysis, Nerve Damage in Lawsuits July 2, 2025 Impella Heart Pump Controller Problems May Be Linked to 3 Deaths: FDA July 2, 2025 0 Comments Share Your CommentsFirst Name*Last NameEmail* Shared Comments*This field is hidden when viewing the formI authorize the above comments be posted on this page Yes No Post Comment I authorize the above comments be posted on this page Weekly Digest Opt-In Yes, send me a weekly email with the latest lawsuits, recalls and warnings. Want your comments reviewed by a lawyer?To have an attorney review your comments and contact you about a potential case, provide your contact information below. This will not be published.Contact Phone #Alt Phone #Private CommentsNOTE: Providing information for review by an attorney does not form an attorney-client relationship.CAPTCHAGA SourceGA CampaignGA MediumGA ContentGA TermEmailThis field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged. Δ MORE TOP STORIES Depo-Provera Wrongful Death Lawsuit Blames Injections for Fatal Brain Tumor (Posted: today) A wrongful death lawsuit claims a woman’s sister died of a Depo-Provera brain tumor which was not discovered until after her death. MORE ABOUT: DEPO-PROVERA LAWSUITLawsuit Alleges Depo-Provera DMPA Injection Increases Brain Tumor Risks (06/20/2025)Ortho-Cept, Similar Birth Control Pills Linked to Intracranial Meningioma Risks, Study Warns (06/17/2025)Status of Depo-Provera Shot Lawsuits Outlined by MDL Judge (06/13/2025) 12 Hair Dye Lawsuits Over Bladder Cancer Risks Assigned to One Judge in California State Court (Posted: yesterday) A dozen hair dye lawsuits over bladder cancer risks have been consolidated under one California state judge for coordinated pretrial proceedings. MORE ABOUT: HAIR DYE LAWSUITJudge To Meet With Hair Dye Lawyers in Bladder Cancer Lawsuit for Initial Status Conference (06/16/2025)Lawsuit Claims Paul Mitchell, Redken, Other Hair Dyes Led to Bladder Cancer Diagnosis for Hairdresser (05/09/2025)Salon Stylist Files Lawsuit Over Bladder Cancer From Hair Dye Products (05/02/2025) BioZorb Implant Removal Surgery: What Women Need To Know When the Device Fails To Dissolve (Posted: 2 days ago) Following a Class I recall, more than 100 BioZorb lawsuits have been filed by breast cancer survivors who suffered painful complications after the surgical tissue marker failed to dissolve as intended. MORE ABOUT: BIOZORB LAWSUITLawsuit Claims Biozorb Implant Penetrated Skin, Causing Massive Infection (06/04/2025)Breast Cancer Survivors File BioZorb Tissue Marker Lawsuit After Implant Fails (05/20/2025)BioZorb Implant Lawsuit Alleges Tissue Marker Caused Swelling, Fluid Buildup and Chronic Pain (05/14/2025)
Nitrous Oxide Side Effects From Long-Term Use Linked to Paralysis, Nerve Damage in Lawsuits July 2, 2025
Depo-Provera Wrongful Death Lawsuit Blames Injections for Fatal Brain Tumor (Posted: today) A wrongful death lawsuit claims a woman’s sister died of a Depo-Provera brain tumor which was not discovered until after her death. MORE ABOUT: DEPO-PROVERA LAWSUITLawsuit Alleges Depo-Provera DMPA Injection Increases Brain Tumor Risks (06/20/2025)Ortho-Cept, Similar Birth Control Pills Linked to Intracranial Meningioma Risks, Study Warns (06/17/2025)Status of Depo-Provera Shot Lawsuits Outlined by MDL Judge (06/13/2025)
12 Hair Dye Lawsuits Over Bladder Cancer Risks Assigned to One Judge in California State Court (Posted: yesterday) A dozen hair dye lawsuits over bladder cancer risks have been consolidated under one California state judge for coordinated pretrial proceedings. MORE ABOUT: HAIR DYE LAWSUITJudge To Meet With Hair Dye Lawyers in Bladder Cancer Lawsuit for Initial Status Conference (06/16/2025)Lawsuit Claims Paul Mitchell, Redken, Other Hair Dyes Led to Bladder Cancer Diagnosis for Hairdresser (05/09/2025)Salon Stylist Files Lawsuit Over Bladder Cancer From Hair Dye Products (05/02/2025)
BioZorb Implant Removal Surgery: What Women Need To Know When the Device Fails To Dissolve (Posted: 2 days ago) Following a Class I recall, more than 100 BioZorb lawsuits have been filed by breast cancer survivors who suffered painful complications after the surgical tissue marker failed to dissolve as intended. MORE ABOUT: BIOZORB LAWSUITLawsuit Claims Biozorb Implant Penetrated Skin, Causing Massive Infection (06/04/2025)Breast Cancer Survivors File BioZorb Tissue Marker Lawsuit After Implant Fails (05/20/2025)BioZorb Implant Lawsuit Alleges Tissue Marker Caused Swelling, Fluid Buildup and Chronic Pain (05/14/2025)