Acura Integra Seatbelt Lawsuit Results in $55M Verdict Against Honda

|

Honda Motor Co. was hit with a $55 million verdict last week, in a product liability lawsuit brought over seatbelt problems in a 1999 Acura Integra.

The complaint was brought by Carlos Martinez, who suffered severe injuries in an auto accident that left him a quadriplegic.

According to allegations raised in the lawsuit, a defect in the design of the Acura Integra seatbelts allowed Martinez’s head to hit the top of the car when it rolled over in the accident, leaving him with severe brain damage.

Sports-Betting-Addiction-Lawsuits
Sports-Betting-Addiction-Lawsuits

Honda allegedly knew about the potential risk of seatbelt problems with the vehicles, yet failed to take appropriate actions to correct the issue.

Following trial before a Philadelphia jury that ended last week, Martinez was awarded $55 million in damages, including $25 million for noneconomic damages, $14.6 million for pain and suffering, $720,000 for lost future earnings, and $15 million for his wife’s loss of consortium. The verdict is believed to be the largest for an auto defect lawsuit in the state’s history.

Honda defeated a similar claim in February, when a Louisiana jury sided with the auto maker and ruled that the design of the seatbelt system in the 1995 Honda Accord was not defective. That wrongful death lawsuit was brought on behalf of Paul Day Allred, Jr., who suffered fatal head injuries in an accident while driving one of the vehicles.

While the lawsuit claimed that the injury occurred because Allred’s head hit the roof of the vehicle, that jury found that Allred’s death was caused by the driver of the other vehicle that hit his car.

Written by: Irvin Jackson

Senior Legal Journalist & Contributing Editor

Irvin Jackson is a senior investigative reporter at AboutLawsuits.com with more than 30 years of experience covering mass tort litigation, environmental policy, and consumer safety. He previously served as Associate Editor at Inside the EPA and contributes original reporting on product liability lawsuits, regulatory failures, and nationwide litigation trends.

Image Credit: |



0 Comments


This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

Share Your Comments

This field is hidden when viewing the form
I authorize the above comments be posted on this page
Post Comment
Weekly Digest Opt-In

Want your comments reviewed by a lawyer?

To have an attorney review your comments and contact you about a potential case, provide your contact information below. This will not be published.

NOTE: Providing information for review by an attorney does not form an attorney-client relationship.

MORE TOP STORIES

Parties involved in a Dupixent T-cell lymphoma wrongful death lawsuit will participate in an initial status conference in early December, to map out how the litigation will move forward.
A group of plaintiffs are asking a panel of federal judges to consolidate all Lyft lawsuits involving driver sexual assaults against passengers before one judge as part of a Lyft MDL.
Federal regulators warned years ago that mesh implants were never approved for use in breast surgery, yet manufacturers continued marketing them as internal bra devices for reconstruction and cosmetic augmentation.