Actos Verdict of $6.5M in First Bladder Cancer Lawsuit Reinstated on Appeal

A California appeals court has decided to reinstate a $6.5 million damage award returned by the first jury to hear evidence about the link between Actos and bladder cancer, overturning a post-trial ruling by the judge who presided over the case.

The verdict came in a lawsuit filed by Jack Cooper, which was the first of more than 4,000 Actos lawsuits to reach a jury involving allegations that Takeda Pharmaceuticals failed to adequately warn that users may face an increased risk of bladder cancer.

Cooper was diagnosed with bladder cancer in November 2011, following use of Actos for more than two years. His case was given an expedited trial date in California state court due to his grave medical condition.

Did You Know?

AT&T Data Breach Impacts Millions of Customers

More than 73 million customers of AT&T may have had their names, addresses, phone numbers, Social Security numbers and other information released on the dark web due to a massive AT&T data breach. Lawsuits are being pursued to obtain financial compensation.

Learn More

Following more than two months of trial, the jury determined that Takeda should be held liable for providing inadequate warnings about the cancer risks with Actos to Cooper and his physicians, awarding $5 million in damages to Jack and $1.5 million to his wife, Nancy Cooper, for loss of consortium.

Following post-trial motions, the verdict was overturned when the trial judge excluded expert witness testimony offered on behalf of the plaintiff.

In an opinion (PDF) entered by the California Court of Appeals on July 15, that decision was overturned and the original verdict was reinstated.

“By requiring that the expert rule out all other possible causes for Jack Cooper’s bladder cancer, even where there was no substantial evidence that other such causes might be relevant, the court exceeded the proper boundaries of its gatekeeping functions in determining the admissibility of the complex scientific testimony,” the appellate court ruled. “We also conclude that the evidence supported giving a jury instruction on multiple causation. Accordingly, we reverse the judgment notwithstanding the verdict and order granting a new trial, as well as the subsequent judgment entered in favor of Takeda, and remand the matter to the trial court with directions to enter a new judgment based on the jury’s verdict.”

Several years after the verdict was returned in the Cooper trial, Takeda agreed to pay $2.4 billion in Actos settlements to resolve claims brought by thousands of individuals nationwide.

Image Credit: |

0 Comments

Share Your Comments

I authorize the above comments be posted on this page*

Want your comments reviewed by a lawyer?

To have an attorney review your comments and contact you about a potential case, provide your contact information below. This will not be published.

NOTE: Providing information for review by an attorney does not form an attorney-client relationship.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

More Top Stories

AT&T Data Breach Class Action Claims Telecom Giant
AT&T Data Breach Class Action Claims Telecom Giant "Disregarded" Customer Financial Safety (Posted yesterday)

A Missouri woman is one of the latest person to file an class action claim over the AT&T data breach, after the telecom company admitted that hackers stole millions of customers' personal information and sold it on the internet.

Plaintiffs Oppose Phased Discovery Over Suboxone Tooth Decay Risks in MDL
Plaintiffs Oppose Phased Discovery Over Suboxone Tooth Decay Risks in MDL (Posted 2 days ago)

Plaintiffs say a federal judge should not waste time on a phased discovery plan requiring them to first prove Suboxone strips can cause tooth decay, saying the science is obvious and such a plan could delay resolution of hundreds of product liability lawsuits.