Scope Infection Lawsuit Patients across the United States have filed medical scope infection lawsuits after contaminated endoscopes and duodenoscopes allegedly transmitted dangerous bacterial infections during procedures such as ERCP, colonoscopy, and other endoscopic treatments.
Spinal Cord Stimulator Lawsuit Spinal cord stimulator lawsuits allege that implanted pain devices malfunctioned, migrated, or caused nerve damage, often forcing patients to undergo revision or removal surgery.
Chlorpyrifos Parkinsonโs Disease Lawsuit Chlorpyrifos lawsuits are being investigated for individuals diagnosed with Parkinsonโs disease after direct, residential, occupational or Gulf War pesticide exposure.
Ozempic Lawsuit Lawyers are pursuing Ozempic lawsuits, Wegovy lawsuits and Mounjaro lawsuits over gastroparesis or stomach paralysis, which can leave users with long-term gastrointestinal side effects
Suboxone Tooth Decay Lawsuit Lawsuits are being pursued by users of Suboxone who experienced tooth loss, broken teeth or required dental extractions. Settlement benefits may be available.
Depo-Provera Lawsuit Depo-Provera lawsuits are being investigated for women who developed meningioma brain tumors after receiving Depo-Provera birth control shots, claiming that Pfizer failed to adequately disclose side effects.
Hair Relaxer Lawsuit Regular exposure to chemicals in hair relaxer may cause uterine cancer, ovarian cancer and other injuries. Women diagnosed with cancer may be eligible for settlement benefits.
Nitrous Oxide Lawsuit Individuals who suffered harm, or families who lost a loved one after using nitrous oxide products may be eligible for financial compensation through a nitrous oxide lawsuit.
Breast Mesh Lawsuit Lawyers are investigating breast mesh lawsuits for women who suffered infections, pain, or implant failure from internal bra implants used in breast reconstruction surgery.
Bard PowerPort Lawsuit Serious and life-threatening injuries have been linked to problems with Bard PowerPort. Lawsuits are now being pursued by individuals who suffered injuries from the implantable port catheter fracturing or migrating.
Anterior Growth Guidance Appliance (AGGA) Lawsuits Claim Dental Device Destroyed Teeth, Caused Other Permanent DamagePlaintiffs who have filed Anterior Growth Guidance Appliance lawsuits say the device is not fit for adults, and causes damage to the upper jaw and teeth. March 16, 2023 Irvin Jackson Add Your CommentsA growing number of AGGA lawsuits have been filed over the past few years, each raising similar allegations that a dental device known as an Anterior Growth Guidance Appliance, or AGGA, destroyed teeth, disfigured their face and caused other serious health problems.The Anterior Growth Guidance Appliance (AGGA) is a metal, wire insert placed between a patientโs teeth, which is supposed to help remodel or expand an adultโs jaw without the need of surgery. However, over the past three years, at least 20 patients have filed APPA lawsuits against the manufacturers and designers, including Steve Galella, D.D.S, OtrhoMatrix Corp, and Johnโs Dental Laboratory, Inc.The dental device is supposed to cause three-dimensional changes in adult jaws, which can move the maxilla forward horizontally over time as much as 10 mm or more. However, plaintiffs indicate that, instead, the device pushes the upper teeth out of their housings, resulting in serious and painful injuries.The lawsuits date back to at least 2000, indicating that the AGGA device was originally designed for children, who are still growing naturally, but alleging that it is unreasonably dangerous for adults, whose bone growth has stopped.AGGA LAWSUITSHave you experienced problems with an AGGA dental device?Problems with the AGGA dental device have caused severe teeth damage and disfiguring injuries. Financial compensation may be available through an AGGA lawsuit.Learn MoreSEE IF YOU QUALIFY FOR COMPENSATIONAGGA LAWSUITSHave you experienced problems with an AGGA dental device?Problems with the AGGA dental device have caused severe teeth damage and disfiguring injuries. Financial compensation may be available through an AGGA lawsuit.Learn MoreSEE IF YOU QUALIFY FOR COMPENSATIONOne of the most recent lawsuits was filed on March 3, when Michael Haile and Melanie Pappalardi filed a complaint (PDF) in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Indiana.Haile, of New York, indicates that he was prescribed an AGGA in May 2019, due to problems with his airway and open bite. The device was removed and replaced in February 2021. However, even a year before that, in February 2020, Haile began to suspect the device was causing damage, but was reassured by his provider that his discomfort was a normal part of the procedure.The lawsuit indicates that use of the AGGA caused significant dental damage, including loosening of anterior maxillary teeth; pain; flaring of the front teeth; gum recession; probably root resorption and alveolar bone loss.The other plaintiff, Pappalardi, received her AGGA device in August 2020, but began to suffer tooth sensitivity and loosening, and had the device removed in August 2021. She indicates the device caused her front upper teeth to be pushed out of the alveolar bone, and also caused her to suffer nerve damage, extreme tooth sensitivity, and will probably lose teeth because of the deviceโs side effects.AGGA Lawsuit Indicates Device Insufficiently Tested on AdultsAccording to allegations raised in the AGGA lawsuit, the manufacturers for not sufficiently testing the design on adults, and did not considering the difference between adult and child bone growth.โDr. Galella and OrthoMatrix, knew or should have known that, while the representations may have been true in regard to the use of AGGA by children (who are still growing naturally), the representations as to adults were unproven, not supported by medical knowledge or science, and were false and materially misleading,โ the lawsuit states. โAGGA is unreasonably dangerous to adult patients in whom it is installed, and is not reasonably safe for use by such patients; and, AGGA is not a substitute for jaw surgery for adults.โThe lawsuit presents claims of negligence, breach of warranty, violation of the Indiana Product Liability Act and the Indiana Deceptive Consumer Sales Act.AGGA Dental Treatment LawsuitsAGGA dental device injury lawyers are now pursuing lawsuits for individuals claiming the AGGA devices were negligently designed, and that plaintiffs were given false representations about the deviceโs efficacy and safety. Settlement compensation from an AGGA lawsuit payoutย may be available for individuals who received an AGGA treatment and suffered any of the following injuries;Loosing of upper teeth (anterior maxillary teeth)Tooth loss and/or damageTooth or Jaw painFlared teethGum RecessionTissue breakdown around tooth (Root Resorption)Tooth socket bone loss (Alveolar bone loss)Facial disfigurementNerve damageRequired corrective surgery Written by: Irvin JacksonSenior Legal Journalist & Contributing EditorIrvin Jackson is a senior investigative reporter at AboutLawsuits.com with more than 30 years of experience covering mass tort litigation, environmental policy, and consumer safety. He previously served as Associate Editor at Inside the EPA and contributes original reporting on product liability lawsuits, regulatory failures, and nationwide litigation trends. Tags: AGGA, Dental, Dental Appliance, Jaw Damage, Orthomatrix, Tooth DamageMore AGGA Lawsuit Stories AGGA Lawsuit Alleges โUnreasonably Dangerousโ Appliance Caused Permanent Dental Side Effects October 8, 2024 Lawsuit Claims AGGA Device Damaged Teeth, Resulting in Disfiguring Injury July 19, 2024 AGGA Lawsuits Allege Appliance Caused Permanent Dental Injury, Bone Loss and Nerve Damage May 8, 2024 1 Comments Research September 24, 2023 A female’s intra-oral photo of the damage caused by AGGA also shows that an oral surgeon had extracted premolars in accordance with an unproven orthodontic claim that children can not grow forward enough to accommodate all 32 adult teeth. Both AGGA and EXTRACTION ORTHODONTICS DO NOT HAVE ANY PEER -REVIEW, INTER-DISCIPLINARY( ENT, Neurology, gastroenterology, pulmonology) studies to prove that they do not disfigure/injure bone, teeth, tongue space, airway, cervical spine, lungs, digestion, and posture. In fact, the female was a professional wind-instrument player, who sought AGGA as a consequence of extractions causing retrognathic arches with her tongue shoved back into her airway. No person should have to endure the severe risks of jaw surgery to correct damage from wilfully negligent, unscientific, falsely promoted extraction ortho, the false hope of AGGA, or other unethical practice. THERE SHOULD BE A CLASS ACTION AGAINST EXTRACTION ORTHO AND AGGA with a requirement that the dental industry do the interdisciplinary peer review that is needed to stop dangerous extractions and resulting snake oil salesmen. LinkedInThis field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.Share Your CommentsFirst Name*Last NameEmail* Shared Comments*This field is hidden when viewing the formI authorize the above comments be posted on this page Yes NoPost Comment I authorize the above comments be posted on this pageWeekly Digest Opt-In Yes, send me a weekly email with the latest lawsuits, recalls and warnings.Want your comments reviewed by a lawyer?To have an attorney review your comments and contact you about a potential case, provide your contact information below. This will not be published.Contact Phone #Alt Phone #Private CommentsNOTE: Providing information for review by an attorney does not form an attorney-client relationship.CAPTCHAGA SourceGA CampaignGA MediumGA ContentGA TermΔ MORE TOP STORIES Lawsuit Alleges Dupixent Caused Mycosis Fungoides Diagnosis (Posted: yesterday)A Dupixent cancer lawsuit claims the manufacturers failed to adequately test and label the eczema treatment, resulting in a CTCL cancer diagnosis.MORE ABOUT: DUPIXENT LAWSUITDupixent MDL Judge To Meet With Lawyers for Initial Case Management Conference in October 2026 (06/25/2026)Lawsuit Claims Dupixent Cancer Diagnosis Occurred After Only 8 Months of Use (06/17/2026)Rezurock Lawsuit Claims GVHD Medication Caused Debilitating Skin Condition, Prurigo Nodularis (06/12/2026) Fourth Uber Driver Sex Assault Lawsuit Bellwether Trial Set for Oct. 2026 (Posted: 2 days ago)A federal judge has scheduled the fourth bellwether trial involving claims that Uber failed to protect passengers from being sexually assaulted by its drivers for early October.MORE ABOUT: UBER SEXUAL ASSAULT LAWSUITUber Faces Investor Lawsuit Over Failure To Stop Driver Sexual Assaults (07/13/2026)Uber Sexual Assault Lawyers To Meet With MDL Judge Next Week, in Advance of Upcoming Trial (06/26/2026)Lyft Rideshare Assault Lawsuit Alleges Company Attempts To Silence Attack Victims (06/15/2026) Bard PowerPort Lawyers Make Final Preparations for Next MDL Bellwether Trial (Posted: 5 days ago)Plaintiffs and defendants have submitted a joint schedule for a final pretrial conference before the second Bard PowerPort lawsuit bellwether trial over claims the port catheter is defectively designed.MORE ABOUT: BARD POWERPORT LAWSUITNew Trial Sought for First Bard PowerPort Bellwether Lawsuit (06/05/2026)Bard PowerPort Fracture Lawsuit Set For Second Bellwether Trial in Aug. 2026 (05/29/2026)Jury Returns Defense Verdict in First Bard PowerPort Injury Lawsuit (05/11/2026)
AGGA Lawsuit Alleges โUnreasonably Dangerousโ Appliance Caused Permanent Dental Side Effects October 8, 2024
AGGA Lawsuits Allege Appliance Caused Permanent Dental Injury, Bone Loss and Nerve Damage May 8, 2024
Lawsuit Alleges Dupixent Caused Mycosis Fungoides Diagnosis (Posted: yesterday)A Dupixent cancer lawsuit claims the manufacturers failed to adequately test and label the eczema treatment, resulting in a CTCL cancer diagnosis.MORE ABOUT: DUPIXENT LAWSUITDupixent MDL Judge To Meet With Lawyers for Initial Case Management Conference in October 2026 (06/25/2026)Lawsuit Claims Dupixent Cancer Diagnosis Occurred After Only 8 Months of Use (06/17/2026)Rezurock Lawsuit Claims GVHD Medication Caused Debilitating Skin Condition, Prurigo Nodularis (06/12/2026)
Fourth Uber Driver Sex Assault Lawsuit Bellwether Trial Set for Oct. 2026 (Posted: 2 days ago)A federal judge has scheduled the fourth bellwether trial involving claims that Uber failed to protect passengers from being sexually assaulted by its drivers for early October.MORE ABOUT: UBER SEXUAL ASSAULT LAWSUITUber Faces Investor Lawsuit Over Failure To Stop Driver Sexual Assaults (07/13/2026)Uber Sexual Assault Lawyers To Meet With MDL Judge Next Week, in Advance of Upcoming Trial (06/26/2026)Lyft Rideshare Assault Lawsuit Alleges Company Attempts To Silence Attack Victims (06/15/2026)
Bard PowerPort Lawyers Make Final Preparations for Next MDL Bellwether Trial (Posted: 5 days ago)Plaintiffs and defendants have submitted a joint schedule for a final pretrial conference before the second Bard PowerPort lawsuit bellwether trial over claims the port catheter is defectively designed.MORE ABOUT: BARD POWERPORT LAWSUITNew Trial Sought for First Bard PowerPort Bellwether Lawsuit (06/05/2026)Bard PowerPort Fracture Lawsuit Set For Second Bellwether Trial in Aug. 2026 (05/29/2026)Jury Returns Defense Verdict in First Bard PowerPort Injury Lawsuit (05/11/2026)