Skip Navigation

Eligible for a Heated Insole lawsuit?

Amazon Heated Underwear Lawsuit Claims Electric Garment Caused Severe Burns

Amazon Heated Underwear Lawsuit Claims Electric Garment Caused Severe Burns

A Pennsylvania man has filed a product liability lawsuit alleging that heated underwear he purchased on Amazon overheated while he was wearing it, causing severe burns and other permanent injuries.

The complaint (PDF) was brought by Nicholas Evangelista in the U.S. District Court of Pennsylvania on May 27, naming Amazon.com Services LLC as the defendant.

Evangelista alleges he was wearing the Savior heated underwear while shoveling snow, but instead of keeping him warm, the product overheated and caused severe burns and other injuries that left him permanently disfigured.

Heated Apparel Burn Injuries

Savior heated underwear comes equipped with electrically heated coils and are intended to be worn under clothing to help keep the user warm. However, Evangelistaโ€™s lawsuit joins a series of complaints filed in recent months over various electrically heated garments. Many of these filings allege that battery-powered devices meant to provide comfort have instead caused fires, severe burns and other lasting harm.

A number of recent heated insole lawsuits claim that inadequate safeguards in foot warmer devices have allowed those products to overheat while being worn, leading to serious burn injuries that often result in nerve injuries and surgical debridement. Many of these claims focus on Amazonโ€™s role in selling and distributing heated socks and other battery-powered warming apparel.

Heated-Insole-Lawsuit-Electric-Foot-Warmer-Lawsuit
Heated-Insole-Lawsuit-Electric-Foot-Warmer-Lawsuit

Heated Underwear Injury Allegations

According to the lawsuit, Evangelista purchased a pair of Savior heated underwear in December 2025 and wore the product on February 9, 2026, while shoveling snow. During use, the underwear allegedly overheated without warning and reached extreme temperatures, causing serious burns to his body.

As a result, Evangelista claims he suffered painful burn injuries that left him permanently disfigured. The lawsuit indicates he experienced skin discoloration and hyperpigmentation, as well as disability, mental anguish, embarrassment, humiliation and a reduced ability to enjoy daily life. He also required extensive medical treatment for his injuries.

The complaint alleges the heated underwear was defectively designed and unreasonably dangerous, and that Evangelistaโ€™s injuries could have been prevented if safer design features or adequate safeguards had been used.

The lawsuit further claims Amazon knew or should have known about the alleged defect, but negligently allowed the heated underwear to continue being sold through its website, exposing consumers to a risk of serious injury.

โ€œThe Heated Underwear failure was such that would not have occurred in the absence of a defect or unreasonably dangerous condition within it.โ€

Nicholas Evangelista v. Amazon.com Services LLC

The complaint raises allegations of strict product liability, negligence, breach of express warranty, breach of implied warranty of merchantability, breach of implied warranty of fitness for a particular purpose and failure to warn. It is seeking compensation for past and future medical treatment, emotional pain and suffering, disability and physical pain.

Sign up for more legal news that could affect you or your family.

Martha Garcia
Written By: Martha Garcia

Health & Medical Research Writer

Martha Garcia is a health and medical research writer at AboutLawsuits.com with over 15 years of experience covering peer-reviewed studies and emerging public health risks. She previously led content strategy at The Blogsmith and contributes original reporting on drug safety, medical research, and health trends impacting consumers.



0 Comments


This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

Share Your Comments

This field is hidden when viewing the form
I authorize the above comments be posted on this page
Post Comment
Weekly Digest Opt-In

Want your comments reviewed by a lawyer?

To have an attorney review your comments and contact you about a potential case, provide your contact information below. This will not be published.

NOTE: Providing information for review by an attorney does not form an attorney-client relationship.

MORE TOP STORIES

The second Bard PowerPort bellwether trial is now scheduled to begin in August after the plaintiff in a claim originally planned for trial next month died, and her family stopped pursuing litigation.
A Delaware woman has filed a Dupixent lawsuit, claiming manufacturers promoted the eczema drug as a breakthrough treatment while failing to warn that it may trigger or worsen CTCL, a rare form of non-Hodgkinโ€™s lymphoma.
Federal regulators have expanded an Omnipod recall after reports that internal tubing defects may cause insulin leaks and under-delivery, potentially triggering dangerous blood sugar spikes.

About the writer

Martha Garcia

Martha Garcia

Martha Garcia is a health and medical research writer at AboutLawsuits.com with over 15 years of experience covering peer-reviewed studies and emerging public health risks. She previously led content strategy at The Blogsmith and contributes original reporting on drug safety, medical research, and health trends impacting consumers.