Side Effects of Antipsychotics May Increase Risk of Cardiac Death: Study

New research suggests that users of antipsychotic medications could face more than triple the risk of suffering sudden cardiac death.

According to the findings of a study presented at last month’s annual meeting of the Heart Rhythm Society, both second-generation atypical antipsychotics, such as Risperdal and Seroquel, and first-generation antipsychotics, such as chlorpromazine, were linked to an increased risk of death due to cardiac arrest.

Researchers looked at data from the Oregon Sudden Unexplained Death Study, an ongoing project looking at 1,544 sudden cardiac deaths and 774 controls.

Spinal-Cord-Stimulation-Lawsuit
Spinal-Cord-Stimulation-Lawsuit

Among those who died of sudden cardiac death (SCD), 8.2% were using an antipsychotic at the time of death, compared with only 1.9% of the subjects in the control group. Most of those involved atypical antipsychotics, which are a newer generation of medications that are promoted as having fewer side effects.

Researchers found no association between just having schizophrenia and sudden cardiac death, but they found that taking first or second generation antipsychotics resulted in a threefold increased risk of SCD. There were too few subjects using third-generation antipsychotics, such as Abilify, to get good data for the study, researchers determined.

Antipsychotics are among the best selling drugs in the world, with about two-thirds of all prescriptions involving the newer, more expensive atypical antipsychotics, which generate nearly $15 billion in annual sales.

Several studies have raised concerns about the wide-spread use of atypical antipsychotics, especially among the elderlya nd those in nursing homes, where they have been used as a form of “chemical restraint.”

In May 2012, aย special report by the Boston Globeย found that about 185,000 nursing home residents nationwide were prescribed antipsychotic medications in 2010, even though they had none of the conditions for which the drugs had been approved to treat.

This widespread use continues despite warnings issued by the FDA and other health experts indicating that the drugs should not to be used to treat patients with Alzheimerโ€™s disease and dementia, because they may increase the risk of death for individuals with those conditions.

Irvin Jackson
Written by: Irvin Jackson

Senior Legal Journalist & Contributing Editor

Irvin Jackson is a senior investigative reporter at AboutLawsuits.com with more than 30 years of experience covering mass tort litigation, environmental policy, and consumer safety. He previously served as Associate Editor at Inside the EPA and contributes original reporting on product liability lawsuits, regulatory failures, and nationwide litigation trends.




0 Comments


This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

Share Your Comments

This field is hidden when viewing the form
I authorize the above comments be posted on this page
Post Comment
Weekly Digest Opt-In

Want your comments reviewed by a lawyer?

To have an attorney review your comments and contact you about a potential case, provide your contact information below. This will not be published.

NOTE: Providing information for review by an attorney does not form an attorney-client relationship.

MORE TOP STORIES

Federal regulators have centralized at least 23 Boston Scientific spinal cord stimulator lawsuits in a multidistrict litigation that excludes multiple similar claims involving Abbott and Nevro implants.
Regeneron and Sanofi-Aventis face a Dupixent injection lawsuit from a Louisiana woman who says the companies knew about the drug’s risks but downplayed them to doctors and patients.