Avelox Nerve Problems Result in Peripheral Neuropathy Lawsuit Against Bayer

|

Bayer Healthcare and Merck & Co. face a product liability brought by a North Carolina women, who claims that she suffered permanent nerve problems from Avelox, a popular antibiotic that has been linked to a risk of peripheral neuropathy. 

The complaint (PDF) was filed by Aimee King in the U.S. District Court for the Western District of North Carolina on May 1, alleging that the pharmaceutical companies knew or should have known for more than two decades about the risk of permanent nerve damage from Avelox and other similar antibiotics, yet failed to adequately warn consumers and the medical community.

Avelox (moxifloxacin) was introduced in 1999, as a new member of the popular class of antibiotics known as fluoroquinolones, which also includes the widely used drugs Cipro and Levaquin. While all members of the class have contained warnings about reports of nerve damage, King indicates that the warnings misleadingly indicated that the problems were rare and failed to disclose that users may suffer peripheral neuropathy that is permanent.

Sports-Betting-Addiction-Lawsuits
Sports-Betting-Addiction-Lawsuits

Peripheral neuropathy involves damage to the nerves that may impair sensation, movement and other aspects of health. Symptoms may include pain, burning, tingling, numbness, weakness and sensitivity to light touches, temperature and motion in the arms and legs.

King’s case joins a growing number of Avelox peripheral neuropathy lawsuits being filed by individuals nationwide, as well as Levaquin lawsuit and Cipro lawsuits, which all raise similar allegations that the drug makers withheld information about the link between nerve problems and the antiobiotics.

In August 2013, the FDA required the makers of all fluoroquinolones to provide stronger warnings about the peripheral neuropathy risk from the antibiotics, indicating problems may last for months or years after an individual stops taking the drug. The new label now warns patients to contact their doctors and consider switching to a different class of antibiotics if they experience symptoms of peripheral neuropathy.

According to allegations raised by King and other plaintiffs, the first signs of long-term peripheral neuropathy came in a study published in 2001, after 45 patients reported suffering long-term peripheral nervous system damage after taking fluoroquinolones.

King accuses Bayer and Merck of failing to warn, violating North Carolina’s Product Liability Act, negligence, breach of warranty, fraud, negligent misrepresentation, and fraudulent concealment, seeking both punitive and compensatory damages.

Written by: Irvin Jackson

Senior Legal Journalist & Contributing Editor

Irvin Jackson is a senior investigative reporter at AboutLawsuits.com with more than 30 years of experience covering mass tort litigation, environmental policy, and consumer safety. He previously served as Associate Editor at Inside the EPA and contributes original reporting on product liability lawsuits, regulatory failures, and nationwide litigation trends.

Image Credit: |



0 Comments


This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

Share Your Comments

This field is hidden when viewing the form
I authorize the above comments be posted on this page
Post Comment
Weekly Digest Opt-In

Want your comments reviewed by a lawyer?

To have an attorney review your comments and contact you about a potential case, provide your contact information below. This will not be published.

NOTE: Providing information for review by an attorney does not form an attorney-client relationship.

MORE TOP STORIES

Parties involved in a Dupixent T-cell lymphoma wrongful death lawsuit will participate in an initial status conference in early December, to map out how the litigation will move forward.
A group of plaintiffs are asking a panel of federal judges to consolidate all Lyft lawsuits involving driver sexual assaults against passengers before one judge as part of a Lyft MDL.
Federal regulators warned years ago that mesh implants were never approved for use in breast surgery, yet manufacturers continued marketing them as internal bra devices for reconstruction and cosmetic augmentation.