Partial Summary Judgment Granted in Baxter Heparin Lawsuit
An Illinois judge has determined that the contaminated heparin imported into the United States by Baxter International, Inc. in late 2007 and early 2008 was “unreasonably dangerous,” granting partial summary judgment in a heparin lawsuit filed over injuries allegedly sustained by two people as a result of the blood thinner.
In a case pending in Illinois state court in Cook County, Judge Jennifer Duncan-Brice granted the plaintiffs motion against Baxter on Wednesday, determining that it is not necessary for a jury to decide whether the heparin was defective and unreasonably dangerous. However, the plaintiffs must still establish at trial that their injuries were caused by the contaminated heparin.
There are currently about 300 heparin lawsuits consolidated in Cook County Circuit Court against Baxter and an ingredient supplier, Scientific Protein Laboratories, LLC. Additional cases pending in federal court over the Baxter heparin recall have been consolidated for pretrial proceedings as part of an MDL, or multidistrict litigation, in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Ohio. All of the cases involve similar allegations that tainted lots of heparin distributed by Baxter Healthcare caused severe and potentially life-threatening allergic-type reactions.
Did You Know?
Millions of Philips CPAP Machines Recalled
Philips DreamStation, CPAP and BiPAP machines sold in recent years may pose a risk of cancer, lung damage and other injuries.Learn More
A Baxter heparin recall was issued in January 2008 after a spike in adverse event reports surfaced involving reactions to the blood thinner, which is critical for a number of medical procedures and conditions. Dozens of serious adverse reactions and deaths were reported in connection with the contaminated heparin.
At the time of the recall, Baxter manufactured about half of the injectable heparin sold in the United States and it was discovered that the crude heparin used to make the drug contained a fake ingredient received from a plant in China, which was chemically similar to heparin, yet substantially cheaper. Top FDA officials concluded that the substitution of the fake ingredient that caused the heparin problems was likely done by virtue of economic fraud.
Judge Duncan-Brice’s ruling was based in part on statements by Baxter’s own president and vice president of quality control and president of medication delivery, all of whom described the recalled heparin as defective. The ruling came despite arguments from the drug maker that none of the three executives were scientists qualified to make that determination.
Since the heparin crisis, FDA has ordered the blood thinner to be reformulated in order to more easily detect impurities. However, the new reformulation is 10% weaker than the original heparin formula.
RebeccaMarch 20, 2011 at 8:57 pm
I am already part of the MDL Baxter bad heparin trial. I am looking tp Change attorneys. I began my case in July 2008. My use and bad reaction of the product was recalled. I used the tainted Heparin on Jam 21, 22 2008. I also used the product in Mid Septrmner 2007. I have posessipm of the Hepraim That wad recalled in March of 2008.
"*" indicates required fields
More Top Stories
A Camp Lejeune non-Hodgkin's lymphoma lawsuit blames the death of a woman on her exposure to contaminated water from the military base.
Defendants want to divide the discovery process to focus on the causal links between hair relaxers and cancer.
The FDA has announced it has received 106,000 medical device reports linked to recalled Philips CPAP devices, including nearly 400 deaths.