Scope Infection Lawsuit Patients across the United States have filed medical scope infection lawsuits after contaminated endoscopes and duodenoscopes allegedly transmitted dangerous bacterial infections during procedures such as ERCP, colonoscopy, and other endoscopic treatments.
Spinal Cord Stimulator Lawsuit Spinal cord stimulator lawsuits allege that implanted pain devices malfunctioned, migrated, or caused nerve damage, often forcing patients to undergo revision or removal surgery.
Chlorpyrifos Parkinsonโs Disease Lawsuit Chlorpyrifos lawsuits are being investigated for individuals diagnosed with Parkinsonโs disease after direct, residential, occupational or Gulf War pesticide exposure.
Ozempic Lawsuit Lawyers are pursuing Ozempic lawsuits, Wegovy lawsuits and Mounjaro lawsuits over gastroparesis or stomach paralysis, which can leave users with long-term gastrointestinal side effects
Suboxone Tooth Decay Lawsuit Lawsuits are being pursued by users of Suboxone who experienced tooth loss, broken teeth or required dental extractions. Settlement benefits may be available.
Depo-Provera Lawsuit Depo-Provera lawsuits are being investigated for women who developed meningioma brain tumors after receiving Depo-Provera birth control shots, claiming that Pfizer failed to adequately disclose side effects.
Hair Relaxer Lawsuit Regular exposure to chemicals in hair relaxer may cause uterine cancer, ovarian cancer and other injuries. Women diagnosed with cancer may be eligible for settlement benefits.
Nitrous Oxide Lawsuit Individuals who suffered harm, or families who lost a loved one after using nitrous oxide products may be eligible for financial compensation through a nitrous oxide lawsuit.
Breast Mesh Lawsuit Lawyers are investigating breast mesh lawsuits for women who suffered infections, pain, or implant failure from internal bra implants used in breast reconstruction surgery.
Bard PowerPort Lawsuit Serious and life-threatening injuries have been linked to problems with Bard PowerPort. Lawsuits are now being pursued by individuals who suffered injuries from the implantable port catheter fracturing or migrating.
Boston Scientific Defibrillator Recall: Unapproved Manufacturing Changes March 16, 2010 Staff Writers Add Your CommentsBoston Scientific has been forced to recall several models of implantable heart defibrillators after failing to notify the FDA that it made changes to the devices’ designs.ย The company announced that it was stopping shipment and retrieving field inventory of all its implantable cardioverter defibrillators (ICDs) and cardiac resynchronization therapy defibrillators (CRT-Ds) in a press release on March 15. The company said that it decided to pull the devices from the market after realizing that some changes in how the devices were manufactured were not submitted to FDA for approval, as required by federal law. The FDA has classified the action as a medical device recall.The implants are used to monitor patientsโ hearts for abnormal heart rhythms and then deliver electric shocks to keep the heart beating at the proper rhythm.Do You Know about…Spinal Cord Stimulator lawsuitsSpinal cord stimulator lawsuits are being investigated for individuals who suffered unnecessary shocks, burns or other problems, often resulting in the need for additional surgery to remove the SCS.Learn MoreSEE IF YOU QUALIFY FOR COMPENSATIONDo You Know AboutโฆSpinal Cord Stimulator lawsuitsSpinal cord stimulator lawsuits are being investigated for individuals who suffered unnecessary shocks, burns or other problems, often resulting in the need for additional surgery to remove the SCS.Learn MoreSEE IF YOU QUALIFY FOR COMPENSATIONBoston Scientific says that it does not believe there is any safety concern for people who have had the devices implanted, and have classified the defibrillator recall as a filing error. However, analysts say that the recall of the defibrillators, which account for 15% of the companyโs revenue, could cost $5 million per day until the manufacturing processes are approved.The recall comes less than a month after the Department of Justice filed criminal charges against Guidant LLC, a Boston Scientific subsidiary, for allegedly hiding information regarding catastrophic failures of its Ventak Prizm 2 DR and Contak Renewal ICDs that, in some cases, resulted in death. Boston Scientific announced last November that it intends to pay $296 million in connection with the charges against Guidant. The DOJ says it expects that Boston Scientific is likely to enter a guilty plea in connection with the charges.The criminal charges are related to earlier defibrillator manufacturing changes that prosecutors say were done to cover up deaths from defective defibrillator designs. The DOJ charges say that Guidant failed to inform the FDA of the changes in order to avoid scrutiny. The company continued to find problems with its defibrillators, and prosecutors say the company sent product updates to physicians that it did not send to FDA, as required by law, and even after other problems with other ICDs developed, the company did not issue a warning about the failures until June 2005.The FDA determined that the warnings constituted Class 1 medical device recalls, the most serious category of recalls, which indicate that a product has the probability of causing serious injury or death.The Prizm series, which was included in the criminal investigation, is also one of the units affected by the latest recall for unapproved manufacturing changes. Other defibrillator lines affected by the recall include the Cognis, Confient, Livian, Renewal, Teligen and Vitality ICDs and CRT-Ds.Boston Scientific says it plans to work closely with FDA to get the manufacturing changes approved and quickly make the defibrillators available on the market again. Tags: Boston Scientific, Defibrillator, ICD, Medical Device Image Credit: |More Lawsuit Stories Spine Stimulator Injury Lawyers Seek Leadership Roles in Boston Scientific MDL July 31, 2026 Ocoopa Hand Warmer Recall Issued After 350 Burn Injuries, One Death July 31, 2026 Depo-Provera Settlement Information to Be Presented Through Town Hall Meeting July 30, 2026 5 Comments Joelene March 24, 2014 Anyone having persistent shocks or any symptoms should see the cardiologist and have their devices checked out. You could be getting inappropriate shocks or not. Best to be safe. Ask your doctors to inform you if there are any recalls or concerns being investigated regarding your make and model. You can also call the company and get information. You also can research the internet or have someone do it for you. Knowledge is power! Eira April 10, 2012 I have a defibrilator implanted on 2010, Boston Scientific ALTRUA 40 SN 576297 I am experiencing continuous chocking sensation that literally takes my breath away, causing me to be in bed some times for days due to the lack of energy and dizziness, should I therefore be concern regarding this device? I did have an incident were I had a white out at a store were I became onconcious, I was told at the ER that I had a zeasure could this be a cause of a malfunction of my device? d-b July 2, 2011 my uncle just went to the er , his defib was shocking him over and over again. any thoughts? Larry April 6, 2010 I have a Guidant defibrilator implanted in my chest and I have trouble sometimes and it shocks me. I had to go to ememrgency on a couple of occasions. I am not sure that this deviceis safe for me. Tony March 17, 2010 Will they publish the model numbers of the defribrillators involved in the controversy? CommentsThis field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.Share Your CommentsFirst Name*Last NameEmail* Shared Comments*This field is hidden when viewing the formI authorize the above comments be posted on this page Yes NoPost Comment I authorize the above comments be posted on this pageWeekly Digest Opt-In Yes, send me a weekly email with the latest lawsuits, recalls and warnings.Want your comments reviewed by a lawyer?To have an attorney review your comments and contact you about a potential case, provide your contact information below. This will not be published.Contact Phone #Alt Phone #Private CommentsNOTE: Providing information for review by an attorney does not form an attorney-client relationship.CAPTCHAGA SourceGA CampaignGA MediumGA ContentGA TermΔ MORE TOP STORIES Spine Stimulator Injury Lawyers Seek Leadership Roles in Boston Scientific MDL (Posted: today)Lawyers involved in Boston Scientific spinal cord stimulator lawsuits have proposed an organizational structure for those chosen to represent the needs of all plaintiffs in the litigation.MORE ABOUT: SPINAL CORD STIMULATOR LAWSUITSpinal Cord Stimulator Reprogramming Caused Electric Shocks, Worsening Pain: Lawsuit (07/27/2026)Abbott Faces Spine Stimulator Lawsuit Brought Jointly by 17 Injured Patients (07/23/2026)Boston Scientific Spinal Cord Stimulator Lawyers to Meet With MDL Judge for Initial Conference Aug. 5 (07/16/2026) Depo-Provera Settlement Information to Be Presented Through Town Hall Meeting (Posted: yesterday)A federal judge has reviewed a Depo-Provera settlement agreement that could resolve thousands of brain tumor lawsuits, indicating that details of the confidential plan will be revealed to plaintiffs at a future hearing.MORE ABOUT: DEPO-PROVERA LAWSUITNew Study Adds to Evidence Depo-Provera Injections Cause Meningioma Brain Tumor Risks (07/13/2026)Depo-Provera Lawsuit Settlement Agreement May Resolve Eligible Meningioma Claims in MDL (06/15/2026)Depo-Provera Meningioma Side Effects Left Woman With Debilitating Migraines, Lawsuit Claims (06/05/2026) J&J Agrees to $5.5B Talcum Powder Settlement Payout to Resolve Ovarian Cancer Lawsuits (Posted: 2 days ago)A $5.5 billion settlement deal could resolve nearly 80,000 talcum powder cancer lawsuits that claim Johnson & Johnson products were contaminated with asbestos.MORE ABOUT: TALCUM POWDER CANCER LAWSUITSAdditional Talks To Settle Talcum Powder Cancer Lawsuits Set for April 13 (03/20/2026)Ovarian Cancer Talcum Powder Lawsuit Results in $250K Verdict Against J&J (02/16/2026)Evidence That Baby Powder Causes Ovarian Cancer Should Be Admissible At Trial: Report (01/22/2026)
Spine Stimulator Injury Lawyers Seek Leadership Roles in Boston Scientific MDL (Posted: today)Lawyers involved in Boston Scientific spinal cord stimulator lawsuits have proposed an organizational structure for those chosen to represent the needs of all plaintiffs in the litigation.MORE ABOUT: SPINAL CORD STIMULATOR LAWSUITSpinal Cord Stimulator Reprogramming Caused Electric Shocks, Worsening Pain: Lawsuit (07/27/2026)Abbott Faces Spine Stimulator Lawsuit Brought Jointly by 17 Injured Patients (07/23/2026)Boston Scientific Spinal Cord Stimulator Lawyers to Meet With MDL Judge for Initial Conference Aug. 5 (07/16/2026)
Depo-Provera Settlement Information to Be Presented Through Town Hall Meeting (Posted: yesterday)A federal judge has reviewed a Depo-Provera settlement agreement that could resolve thousands of brain tumor lawsuits, indicating that details of the confidential plan will be revealed to plaintiffs at a future hearing.MORE ABOUT: DEPO-PROVERA LAWSUITNew Study Adds to Evidence Depo-Provera Injections Cause Meningioma Brain Tumor Risks (07/13/2026)Depo-Provera Lawsuit Settlement Agreement May Resolve Eligible Meningioma Claims in MDL (06/15/2026)Depo-Provera Meningioma Side Effects Left Woman With Debilitating Migraines, Lawsuit Claims (06/05/2026)
J&J Agrees to $5.5B Talcum Powder Settlement Payout to Resolve Ovarian Cancer Lawsuits (Posted: 2 days ago)A $5.5 billion settlement deal could resolve nearly 80,000 talcum powder cancer lawsuits that claim Johnson & Johnson products were contaminated with asbestos.MORE ABOUT: TALCUM POWDER CANCER LAWSUITSAdditional Talks To Settle Talcum Powder Cancer Lawsuits Set for April 13 (03/20/2026)Ovarian Cancer Talcum Powder Lawsuit Results in $250K Verdict Against J&J (02/16/2026)Evidence That Baby Powder Causes Ovarian Cancer Should Be Admissible At Trial: Report (01/22/2026)