Sports Betting Addiction Lawsuit Sports betting addiction lawsuits are being investigated for college students and young adults who developed gambling problems after using apps like FanDuel and DraftKings, alleging that the platforms failed to warn about the addictive nature of their features and marketing practices.
Nitrous Oxide Lawsuit Individuals who suffered harm, or families who lost a loved one after using nitrous oxide products may be eligible for financial compensation through a nitrous oxide lawsuit.
Hair Relaxer Lawsuit Regular exposure to chemicals in hair relaxer may cause uterine cancer, ovarian cancer and other injuries. Women diagnosed with cancer may be eligible for settlement benefits.
Depo-Provera Lawsuit Depo-Provera lawsuits are being investigated for women who developed meningioma brain tumors after receiving Depo-Provera birth control shots, claiming that Pfizer failed to adequately disclose side effects.
Ozempic Lawsuit Lawyers are pursuing Ozempic lawsuits, Wegovy lawsuits and Mounjaro lawsuits over gastroparesis or stomach paralysis, which can leave users with long-term gastrointestinal side effects
Suboxone Tooth Decay Lawsuit Lawsuits are being pursued by users of Suboxone who experienced tooth loss, broken teeth or required dental extractions. Settlement benefits may be available.
Change Healthcare Lawsuit Lawyers are reviewing Change Healthcare class action lawsuits for individuals who had their personal information stolen due to the data breach.
Bard PowerPort Lawsuit Serious and life-threatening injuries have been linked to problems with Bard PowerPort. Lawsuits are now being pursued by individuals who suffered injuries from the implantable port catheter fracturing or migrating.
AngioDynamics Port Catheter Lawsuit Serious and life-threatening injuries have been linked to problems with Bard PowerPort. Lawsuits are now being pursued by individuals who suffered injuries from the implantable port catheter fracturing or migrating.
Processed Food Lawsuit Lawsuits are being pursued against the food industry over their manufacturing and advertising of ultra-processed foods, which have caused a generation of children to face an increased risk of developing childhood diabetes and other chronic illnesses.
NHTSA Faces Lawsuit Over Automatic Emergency Braking Petition December 6, 2016 Russell Maas Add Your Comments Consumer advocate groups have filed a lawsuit against the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA), indicating that the agency has failed to respond to a petition calling for mandatory automatic braking systems and other safety measures to become standard safety equipment in all U.S. vehicles. The Center for Auto Safety, and Consumer Watchdog, together with former NHTSA administrator Joan Claybrook, filed a complaint (PDF) in the United States District Court for the District of Columbia on November 23, 2016, naming the NHTSA and its current administrator, Mark R. Rosekind, as defendants. The lawsuit claims the defendants violated federal law by failing to respond to a petition within 120 days, which requested the NHTSA to use its statutory authority to mandate Automatic Emergency Braking (AEB) systems be required as standard equipment in all new vehicles. According to the lawsuit, the plaintiffs filed a petition (PDF) with the NHTSA on January 13, calling for it to enact a safety regulation requiring all light vehicles manufacturers to incorporate Forward Collision Warning, Crash Imminent Braking, and Dynamic Brake Support systems; known collectively as AEB. Do You Know about… SPORTS BETTING ADDICTION LAWSUITS FOR YOUNG ADULTS Gambling addiction and severe financial losses have been linked to popular sports betting platforms like DraftKings, FanDuel, and Caesars. Lawsuits are being filed by young adults and students who were targeted by deceptive promotions, addictive app features, and aggressive marketing tactics. See if you qualify for a sports betting addiction lawsuit. Learn More SEE IF YOU QUALIFY FOR COMPENSATION Do You Know About… SPORTS BETTING ADDICTION LAWSUITS FOR YOUNG ADULTS Gambling addiction and severe financial losses have been linked to popular sports betting platforms like DraftKings, FanDuel, and Caesars. Lawsuits are being filed by young adults and students who were targeted by deceptive promotions, addictive app features, and aggressive marketing tactics. See if you qualify for a sports betting addiction lawsuit. Learn More SEE IF YOU QUALIFY FOR COMPENSATION Several studies have been identified which the plaintiffs say establish that AEB technology is extremely beneficial, including one study published by the Insurance Institute for Highway Safety (IIHS) that indicated automatic emergency braking technology could reduce insurance injury claims by as much as 35% by compensating for distracted driving mistakes that have been attributed to a majority of roadway crashes. The petition also noted that NHTSA data indicated the adoption of AEB technology in vehicles could prevent or limit the injuries and property damage from an estimated 910,000 automobile crashes every year. The plaintiffs maintain that the NHTSA violated federal law by failing to respond to the petition within the required 120-day period, and unreasonably withheld implementation of AEB technologies as standard equipment for all light weight vehicles. The lawsuit claims the NHTSA averted proposing a mandatory rule for AEB technology and instead issued voluntary guidelines to automakers. Despite a March 2016 agreement the NHTSA reached with 20 automakers, making up over 90% of the United States automobile industry, which voluntarily committed to follow a safety guideline over the next 10 years that will implement AEB as a standard feature in all lightweight vehicles, the consumer advocacy organizations believe the commitment was weak and that the NHTSA should have done better. According to Claybrook, the voluntary standards promised to be followed by the automakers will not work. Claybrook proclaimed that AEB systems are one of the most important lifesaving automotive systems available in today’s automobile industry and by not implementing statutory guideline automakers will continue to produce weaker and cheaper versions of the safety software. The NHTSA has made other less demanding efforts to encourage automakers to incorporate AEB technologies, such as the agency’s issuance of federal register notice in November 2015, indicating that the agency will be upgrading its 5-Star Rating System to include AEB as a recommended safety technology by 2018. The NHTSA has also made an impact on other desirable safety awards including the Insurance Institute for Highway Safety (IIHS) award. As part of the NHTSA’s New Car Assessment Program released in January 2016, the agency and the Insurance Institute for Highway Safety planned to set specific performance criteria for manufacturers to meet to be eligible for the desirable “IIHS Top Safety Pick” award which included vehicles must have AEB systems. The plaintiff consumer advocacy groups claim the NHTSA and Mark Rosekind’s failure to initiate a rulemaking to require AEB systems to be installed in all light weight vehicles is unreasonable and a response to the petition is required under statutory deadlines given the nature of public interest. The lawsuit states that the NHTSA must reply to the petition filed by plaintiffs within 30 days, and issue a decision on the promulgation of a new proposed rule-making. Tags: Auto Accident More Lawsuit Stories Link Between Hair Relaxers and Cancer To Be Examined by Court During “Science Day” July 3, 2025 Lawyers Ordered To Engage in Talcum Powder Settlement Talks in MDL July 3, 2025 JAK Inhibitors Could Increase Cancer Risks by as Much as 40%: Study July 3, 2025 0 Comments Share Your CommentsFirst Name*Last NameEmail* Shared Comments*This field is hidden when viewing the formI authorize the above comments be posted on this page Yes No Post Comment I authorize the above comments be posted on this page Weekly Digest Opt-In Yes, send me a weekly email with the latest lawsuits, recalls and warnings. Want your comments reviewed by a lawyer?To have an attorney review your comments and contact you about a potential case, provide your contact information below. This will not be published.Contact Phone #Alt Phone #Private CommentsNOTE: Providing information for review by an attorney does not form an attorney-client relationship.CAPTCHAGA SourceGA CampaignGA MediumGA ContentGA TermCommentsThis field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged. Δ MORE TOP STORIES Link Between Hair Relaxers and Cancer To Be Examined by Court During “Science Day” (Posted: 3 days ago) A federal judge has called for Science Day presentations to explain to the court the theories and evidence linking hair relaxer to increased cancer risks. MORE ABOUT: HAIR RELAXER LAWSUITHair Relaxer Cancer Lawsuits Continue To Be Filed as Lawyers Prepare First Cases for Trial (06/24/2025)Replacement Hair Relaxer Lawsuit To Be Selected for MDL Bellwether Pool (06/12/2025)Hair Relaxer Lawsuits and Talcum Powder Lawsuits Designated as New Mass Torts in Philadelphia (05/30/2025) Lawyers Ordered To Engage in Talcum Powder Settlement Talks in MDL (Posted: 3 days ago) A special mediator has been appointed to oversee negotiations between Johnson & Johnson and tens of thousands of women who say its talcum powder products caused them to develop reproductive system cancers. MORE ABOUT: TALCUM POWDER LAWSUITSTalcum Powder Ovarian Cancer Lawsuit Selected for First Federal Bellwether Trial (07/01/2025)Retired Talcum Powder Judge May Be Appointed To Address Renewed Expert Motions (06/20/2025)Talc Safety To Be Subject of New Independent Scientific Expert Panel Led by FDA (05/22/2025) Depo-Provera Wrongful Death Lawsuit Blames Injections for Fatal Brain Tumor (Posted: 4 days ago) A wrongful death lawsuit claims a woman’s sister died of a Depo-Provera brain tumor which was not discovered until after her death. MORE ABOUT: DEPO-PROVERA LAWSUITLawsuit Alleges Depo-Provera DMPA Injection Increases Brain Tumor Risks (06/20/2025)Ortho-Cept, Similar Birth Control Pills Linked to Intracranial Meningioma Risks, Study Warns (06/17/2025)Status of Depo-Provera Shot Lawsuits Outlined by MDL Judge (06/13/2025)
Link Between Hair Relaxers and Cancer To Be Examined by Court During “Science Day” (Posted: 3 days ago) A federal judge has called for Science Day presentations to explain to the court the theories and evidence linking hair relaxer to increased cancer risks. MORE ABOUT: HAIR RELAXER LAWSUITHair Relaxer Cancer Lawsuits Continue To Be Filed as Lawyers Prepare First Cases for Trial (06/24/2025)Replacement Hair Relaxer Lawsuit To Be Selected for MDL Bellwether Pool (06/12/2025)Hair Relaxer Lawsuits and Talcum Powder Lawsuits Designated as New Mass Torts in Philadelphia (05/30/2025)
Lawyers Ordered To Engage in Talcum Powder Settlement Talks in MDL (Posted: 3 days ago) A special mediator has been appointed to oversee negotiations between Johnson & Johnson and tens of thousands of women who say its talcum powder products caused them to develop reproductive system cancers. MORE ABOUT: TALCUM POWDER LAWSUITSTalcum Powder Ovarian Cancer Lawsuit Selected for First Federal Bellwether Trial (07/01/2025)Retired Talcum Powder Judge May Be Appointed To Address Renewed Expert Motions (06/20/2025)Talc Safety To Be Subject of New Independent Scientific Expert Panel Led by FDA (05/22/2025)
Depo-Provera Wrongful Death Lawsuit Blames Injections for Fatal Brain Tumor (Posted: 4 days ago) A wrongful death lawsuit claims a woman’s sister died of a Depo-Provera brain tumor which was not discovered until after her death. MORE ABOUT: DEPO-PROVERA LAWSUITLawsuit Alleges Depo-Provera DMPA Injection Increases Brain Tumor Risks (06/20/2025)Ortho-Cept, Similar Birth Control Pills Linked to Intracranial Meningioma Risks, Study Warns (06/17/2025)Status of Depo-Provera Shot Lawsuits Outlined by MDL Judge (06/13/2025)