Scope Infection Lawsuit Patients across the United States have filed medical scope infection lawsuits after contaminated endoscopes and duodenoscopes allegedly transmitted dangerous bacterial infections during procedures such as ERCP, colonoscopy, and other endoscopic treatments.
Spinal Cord Stimulator Lawsuit Spinal cord stimulator lawsuits allege that implanted pain devices malfunctioned, migrated, or caused nerve damage, often forcing patients to undergo revision or removal surgery.
Depo-Provera Lawsuit Depo-Provera lawsuits are being investigated for women who developed meningioma brain tumors after receiving Depo-Provera birth control shots, claiming that Pfizer failed to adequately disclose side effects.
Suboxone Tooth Decay Lawsuit Lawsuits are being pursued by users of Suboxone who experienced tooth loss, broken teeth or required dental extractions. Settlement benefits may be available.
Chlorpyrifos Parkinsonโs Disease Lawsuit Chlorpyrifos lawsuits are being investigated for individuals diagnosed with Parkinsonโs disease after direct, residential, occupational or Gulf War pesticide exposure.
Ozempic Lawsuit Lawyers are pursuing Ozempic lawsuits, Wegovy lawsuits and Mounjaro lawsuits over gastroparesis or stomach paralysis, which can leave users with long-term gastrointestinal side effects
Hair Relaxer Lawsuit Regular exposure to chemicals in hair relaxer may cause uterine cancer, ovarian cancer and other injuries. Women diagnosed with cancer may be eligible for settlement benefits.
Bard PowerPort Lawsuit Serious and life-threatening injuries have been linked to problems with Bard PowerPort. Lawsuits are now being pursued by individuals who suffered injuries from the implantable port catheter fracturing or migrating.
Nitrous Oxide Lawsuit Individuals who suffered harm, or families who lost a loved one after using nitrous oxide products may be eligible for financial compensation through a nitrous oxide lawsuit.
Breast Mesh Lawsuit Lawyers are investigating breast mesh lawsuits for women who suffered infections, pain, or implant failure from internal bra implants used in breast reconstruction surgery.
Breast Tissue Expanders Used Near Internal Defibrillators May Cause Magnetic Interference: FDA March 9, 2016 Martha Garcia Add Your CommentsFederal regulators indicate that patients with breast tissue expanders may face a risk of problems with pacemakers and defibrillators, which may fail due to magnetic interference.ย The FDA issued a warning to healthcare providers on March 8, including breast surgeons, cardiac electrophysiologists, cardiologists and plastic surgeons.The ageny indicates that there is the potential for interference between breast tissue expanders with magnetic ports and implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (ICD) or pacemakers. The metal ports used in many breast tissue expanders have the potential to cause ICDs and pacemakers to malfunction, potentially causing serious injury to patients.Do You Know about…Spinal Cord Stimulator lawsuitsSpinal cord stimulator lawsuits are being investigated for individuals who suffered unnecessary shocks, burns or other problems, often resulting in the need for additional surgery to remove the SCS.Learn MoreSEE IF YOU QUALIFY FOR COMPENSATIONDo You Know AboutโฆSpinal Cord Stimulator lawsuitsSpinal cord stimulator lawsuits are being investigated for individuals who suffered unnecessary shocks, burns or other problems, often resulting in the need for additional surgery to remove the SCS.Learn MoreSEE IF YOU QUALIFY FOR COMPENSATIONIn some cases, patients with both the breast expander and a cardiac device may have a magnetic port that can come close enough to the cardiac device to cause magnetic interference.If magnetic interference is caused, the device will enter โmagnet modeโ. In this instance, an ICD will not deliver life-saving shocks or anti-tachycardia pacing therapy, which may be life threatening to the patient if dangerous abnormal heart rhythms were to occur.The warning comes after reports of magnetic interference between breast tissue expanders with magnetic injection ports and either ICDs or pacemakers in patients. The FDA then analyzed peer-reviewed literature, device labeling, adverse event medical device reports, and information from ICD manufacturers, health care organizations, and professional societies.The FDA is calling this a โsmall population risk,โ since it is uncommon for patients with ICD or pacemakers to have also have breast reconstruction. However, for this who may be impacted, it is a potentially serious risk.ICDs are an implantable device used to correct-life threatening heart rhythm abnormalities in patients at risk for sudden cardiac death, or death from heart attack. Pacemakers are small devices placed in the chest or abdomen to help regulate abnormal heart rhythms.Breast tissue expanders are temporarily used to prepare patients for reconstructive breast surgery after mastectomy and also used to treat under-developed breasts or other soft-tissue deformities. Expanders are used for no more than 6 months to prepare the patient for surgery. Some expanders have a magnetic injection port used to guide the surgeon when injecting saline fluid to expand the breast.Inconsistent Device WarningsPatients who experience interference problems may hear an electronic tone indicating that the cardiac device has entered magnet mode, but this does not occur in every instance. When the device enters magnet mode, the device continuously paces without sensing the patient’s own heart rhythm. This can result in irregular heartbeats or more serious injury to the patient.The FDA indicated that the likelihood of either serious event occurring varies depending on the type of cardiac implant and proximity of the expander to the device.Both cardiac devices have labeling warning of potential magnetic interference and the breast expanders label warns of patients who already have implanted devices.In some cases, the ICD can be reprogrammed if a patient has a breast tissue expander in place, to help reduce interference. An alternative expander can be used in patients with implanted cardiac devices, including breast tissue expanders with a non-magnetic port, a non-magnetic metal disc or remote port.The FDA recommends healthcare providers avoid implanting a magnetic-port breast tissue expander when possible in patients with cardiac devices and reviewing all device labels for any implantable devices, including reviewing available treatment options before deciding on a course of action.If a patient with an implanted magnetic breast tissue expander requires the placement of an ICD or pacemaker, the FDA advises careful consideration of the choice of cardiac device, location and timing should be reviewed with the patient. Another possibility to help prevent interference would be to conduct more frequent cardiac device checks. Written by: Martha GarciaHealth & Medical Research WriterMartha Garcia is a health and medical research writer at AboutLawsuits.com with over 15 years of experience covering peer-reviewed studies and emerging public health risks. She previously led content strategy at The Blogsmith and contributes original reporting on drug safety, medical research, and health trends impacting consumers. Tags: ICD, PacemakerMore Lawsuit Stories Port Catheter Lawsuit Claims Defective Design Led to Fungal Bloodstream Infection October 30, 2026 Space Heater Recall Issued After 17 Fires, One Burn Injury: CPSC October 30, 2026 $46.5M Silicosis Lawsuit Payout Awarded Against Quartz Countertop Manufacturer October 29, 2026 0 Comments FacebookThis field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.Share Your CommentsFirst Name*Last NameEmail* Shared Comments*This field is hidden when viewing the formI authorize the above comments be posted on this page Yes NoPost Comment I authorize the above comments be posted on this pageWeekly Digest Opt-In Yes, send me a weekly email with the latest lawsuits, recalls and warnings.Want your comments reviewed by a lawyer?To have an attorney review your comments and contact you about a potential case, provide your contact information below. This will not be published.Contact Phone #Alt Phone #Private CommentsNOTE: Providing information for review by an attorney does not form an attorney-client relationship.CAPTCHAGA SourceGA CampaignGA MediumGA ContentGA TermΔ MORE TOP STORIES $46.5M Silicosis Lawsuit Payout Awarded Against Quartz Countertop Manufacturer (Posted: yesterday)A silicosis lawsuit trial has ended in a California jury ordering a quartz countertop manufacturer to pay a dying man $46.5 million.MORE ABOUT: SILICOSIS LAWSUITInsurer Denies Coverage for Silica Lawsuit Against Stone Manufacturer (10/12/2026)Silicosis Lung Injuries Drive California Push to Ban Artificial Stone Countertops (09/28/2026)Silicosis Risk From Engineered Stone Countertops May Persist Despite Safety Measures: Study (09/25/2026) Five Hair Relaxer Lawsuits Over Cancer Risks Selected for Bellwether Trials (Posted: 2 days ago)A federal judge has announced the selection of five hair relaxer lawsuits to serve as a series of bellwether trials over claims that the chemical straighteners caused women to develop reproductive cancers.MORE ABOUT: HAIR RELAXER LAWSUITFirst Hair Relaxer Cancer Lawsuit Set for Bellwether Trial on Sept. 7, 2027 (09/28/2026)L’Oreal Faces State AG Lawsuit Over Cancer Risks From Hair Relaxers (09/15/2026)L’Oreal Execs To Face More Questions Over Dark and Lovely, Hair Relaxer Cancer Risks (06/29/2026) DraftKings Gambling Lawsuit Alleges Illegal Scheme Fueled Addiction (Posted: 3 days ago)A Massachusetts man’s lawsuit claims he “lost everything” after DraftKings employees began illegally running bets for him across the state border to a casino where they worked.MORE ABOUT: SPORTS BETTING ADDICTION LAWSUITDraftKings Lawsuit Seeks Discovery Into Gambling Algorithms, Bonuses and VIP Rewards (10/22/2026)DraftKings AI Lawsuit Alleges Gambling Promotions Targeted Users Likely to Lose Money (10/07/2026)DraftKings ‘Free Bet’ Promos Targeted Problem Gamblers Using AI: Report (09/29/2026)
$46.5M Silicosis Lawsuit Payout Awarded Against Quartz Countertop Manufacturer (Posted: yesterday)A silicosis lawsuit trial has ended in a California jury ordering a quartz countertop manufacturer to pay a dying man $46.5 million.MORE ABOUT: SILICOSIS LAWSUITInsurer Denies Coverage for Silica Lawsuit Against Stone Manufacturer (10/12/2026)Silicosis Lung Injuries Drive California Push to Ban Artificial Stone Countertops (09/28/2026)Silicosis Risk From Engineered Stone Countertops May Persist Despite Safety Measures: Study (09/25/2026)
Five Hair Relaxer Lawsuits Over Cancer Risks Selected for Bellwether Trials (Posted: 2 days ago)A federal judge has announced the selection of five hair relaxer lawsuits to serve as a series of bellwether trials over claims that the chemical straighteners caused women to develop reproductive cancers.MORE ABOUT: HAIR RELAXER LAWSUITFirst Hair Relaxer Cancer Lawsuit Set for Bellwether Trial on Sept. 7, 2027 (09/28/2026)L’Oreal Faces State AG Lawsuit Over Cancer Risks From Hair Relaxers (09/15/2026)L’Oreal Execs To Face More Questions Over Dark and Lovely, Hair Relaxer Cancer Risks (06/29/2026)
DraftKings Gambling Lawsuit Alleges Illegal Scheme Fueled Addiction (Posted: 3 days ago)A Massachusetts man’s lawsuit claims he “lost everything” after DraftKings employees began illegally running bets for him across the state border to a casino where they worked.MORE ABOUT: SPORTS BETTING ADDICTION LAWSUITDraftKings Lawsuit Seeks Discovery Into Gambling Algorithms, Bonuses and VIP Rewards (10/22/2026)DraftKings AI Lawsuit Alleges Gambling Promotions Targeted Users Likely to Lose Money (10/07/2026)DraftKings ‘Free Bet’ Promos Targeted Problem Gamblers Using AI: Report (09/29/2026)