Breast Mesh Reconstruction Surgery Gaining Popularity Despite Safety Concerns, Lawsuits

Breast Mesh Reconstruction Surgery Gaining Popularity Despite Safety Concerns, Lawsuits

The use of breast mesh in reconstructive surgery is rapidly expanding as manufacturers market the unapproved devices as “internal bras” for women recovering from mastectomy or augmentation, raising growing safety concerns among regulators, surgeons and patients.

In recent years, synthetic and biologic breast mesh products—often called mesh scaffolds—have gained popularity in reconstructive and cosmetic surgery. Surgeons use them to reinforce weakened tissue, improve implant positioning, and provide added support after mastectomy, marketing them as a way to strengthen the breast pocket and improve cosmetic results.

Products like Phasix, GalaFLEX and Strattice were cleared through the FDA’s 510(k) process for soft-tissue reinforcement, but were later promoted for breast reconstruction without agency review or clinical trials confirming their safety for use in breast tissue.

Amid large-scale remarketing efforts by manufacturers, the commercial success of these products continues to grow. 

According to a November Future Market Insights report, the global breast mesh market, currently valued at about $600 million, is projected to exceed $1 billion by 2035 as breast reconstruction procedures become more common and device makers expand marketing partnerships. The United States accounts for the majority of global sales, with companies such as Allergan, Johnson & Johnson and Stryker leading the industry.

However, as sales and usage continue to climb, an increasing number of women are reporting painful breast mesh side effects, including infections, mesh migration, implant failure, and the need for revision surgery.

These reports of injuries have prompted many women to begin investigating whether they may be eligible to file a breast mesh lawsuit over the manufacturers promotion of these devices for breast surgery without FDA approval or adequate safety testing.

Internal-Bra-Injury-Lawyer
Internal-Bra-Injury-Lawyer

Breast Mesh Concerns

The FDA has been raising concerns about problems with these implants since 2021, when it issued a safety communication warning that it has never approved any of these mesh devices for breast implant procedures, and that all reconstruction or augmentation use is off label.

Recent studies have reinforced the FDA’s concerns, finding that breast mesh use is associated with higher rates of infection, implant displacement and revision surgeries. The FDA’s own 2021 analysis reported increased risks of infection and implant loss, a greater need for reoperations, and inconsistent performance across different mesh products.

In November 2023, the agency sent letters to healthcare professionals warning them that the 510(k) approval was not meant to include use in the human breast, after Becton, Dickinson and Company (BD) updated the labeling on several of its mesh implants to include new warnings and precautionary language. The FDA instead instructed providers to review the updated labeling carefully, disclose the off-label status to patients, and report any mesh-related injuries or revision surgeries through the MedWatch surveillance system.

Breast Mesh Reconstruction Lawsuits

Despite these warnings, manufacturers have continued to promote the products for breast surgery, which has now led to a growing number of breast mesh reconstruction complications being reported, as sales continue to rise. 

As a result, breast mesh injury lawyers are now investigating potential lawsuits for women who claim they were never informed that the products were not approved for use in the breast, or of the injuries or side effects that have become so common. 

These investigations allege that manufacturers promoted breast mesh products for reconstruction and augmentation without FDA approval or supporting long-term safety data. As awareness of the risks spreads, a growing number of injured women are expected to seek legal representation and pursue compensation for complications linked to the implants, including:

  • Infections
  • Mesh migration
  • Implant failure
  • Chronic pain
  • Revision surgery

Sign up for more health and legal news that could affect you or your family.



Written By: Irvin Jackson

Senior Legal Journalist & Contributing Editor

Irvin Jackson is a senior investigative reporter at AboutLawsuits.com with more than 30 years of experience covering mass tort litigation, environmental policy, and consumer safety. He previously served as Associate Editor at Inside the EPA and contributes original reporting on product liability lawsuits, regulatory failures, and nationwide litigation trends.


0 Comments


This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

Share Your Comments

This field is hidden when viewing the form
I authorize the above comments be posted on this page
Post Comment
Weekly Digest Opt-In

Want your comments reviewed by a lawyer?

To have an attorney review your comments and contact you about a potential case, provide your contact information below. This will not be published.

NOTE: Providing information for review by an attorney does not form an attorney-client relationship.

MORE TOP STORIES

Recall notices are being sent to Amazon customers who purchased tabletop fire pits linked to severe burn injuries, as lawsuits continue to mount against the company and other manufacturers over the allegedly defective and dangerous products.
Ocaliva, promoted as a treatment to prevent liver injury, has been recalled following reports of high rates of liver damage and patient deaths.
Women are sharing alarming reports of pain, infections, and reconstruction failures caused by internal bra mesh implants like GalaFLEX, as the FDA confirms these devices were never approved for breast surgery and lawsuits now allege manufacturers failed to warn about the risks.