Sports Betting Addiction Lawsuit Sports betting addiction lawsuits are being investigated for college students and young adults who developed gambling problems after using apps like FanDuel and DraftKings, alleging that the platforms failed to warn about the addictive nature of their features and marketing practices.
Nitrous Oxide Lawsuit Individuals who suffered harm, or families who lost a loved one after using nitrous oxide products may be eligible for financial compensation through a nitrous oxide lawsuit.
Hair Relaxer Lawsuit Regular exposure to chemicals in hair relaxer may cause uterine cancer, ovarian cancer and other injuries. Women diagnosed with cancer may be eligible for settlement benefits.
Depo-Provera Lawsuit Depo-Provera lawsuits are being investigated for women who developed meningioma brain tumors after receiving Depo-Provera birth control shots, claiming that Pfizer failed to adequately disclose side effects.
Ozempic Lawsuit Lawyers are pursuing Ozempic lawsuits, Wegovy lawsuits and Mounjaro lawsuits over gastroparesis or stomach paralysis, which can leave users with long-term gastrointestinal side effects
Suboxone Tooth Decay Lawsuit Lawsuits are being pursued by users of Suboxone who experienced tooth loss, broken teeth or required dental extractions. Settlement benefits may be available.
Change Healthcare Lawsuit Lawyers are reviewing Change Healthcare class action lawsuits for individuals who had their personal information stolen due to the data breach.
Bard PowerPort Lawsuit Serious and life-threatening injuries have been linked to problems with Bard PowerPort. Lawsuits are now being pursued by individuals who suffered injuries from the implantable port catheter fracturing or migrating.
AngioDynamics Port Catheter Lawsuit Serious and life-threatening injuries have been linked to problems with Bard PowerPort. Lawsuits are now being pursued by individuals who suffered injuries from the implantable port catheter fracturing or migrating.
Processed Food Lawsuit Lawsuits are being pursued against the food industry over their manufacturing and advertising of ultra-processed foods, which have caused a generation of children to face an increased risk of developing childhood diabetes and other chronic illnesses.
Power Morcellator Cancer Problems Should Be Blamed on Doctors, Lawmaker Says July 30, 2015 Irvin Jackson Add Your Comments A Texas congressman and former gynecologist has taken the controversial position of blaming doctors for the spread of cancer during uterine fibroid removal procedures, as opposed to the laparoscopic power morcellators used during the minimally invasive procedures. Power morcellators are medical devices used in recent years to allow surgeons to cut up and remove fibroids through a minimally invasive incision in the abdomen. However, concerns have emerged about the safety of the devices, since some women may have undiagnosed cancers contained within the uterus, which the devices may rapidly spread throughout the body. Questions have been raised by many critics about the safety of the device and the FDA’s oversight, indicating that stronger warnings should have been provided about the potential cancer risks with morcellators. Learn More About Hysterectomy Morcellation Cancer Lawsuits Power morcellators used during a laparoscopic hysterectomy or uterine fibroid surgery may cause the spread of aggressive cancer. Learn More SEE IF YOU QUALIFY FOR COMPENSATION Learn More About Hysterectomy Morcellation Cancer Lawsuits Power morcellators used during a laparoscopic hysterectomy or uterine fibroid surgery may cause the spread of aggressive cancer. Learn More SEE IF YOU QUALIFY FOR COMPENSATION According to a report by the Dallas Observer, Congressman Michael Burgess, a Texas “Tea Party” Republican, said recently that there was no problem with the design of power morcellators, but instead said that doctors should have known that shredding fibroids could potentially release cancerous cells into the body. Debate Over FDA Regulation The statements come amid debate over the “21st Century Cures Act”, which passed the House earlier this month and seeks to modernize the way the FDA approves new drugs and new medical devices, among other goals. Another Republican, Mike Fitzpatrick of Pennsylvania, and a cancer survivor, called for the addition of an amendment that would require unique device identifier numbers to be added to electronic health records, so that it would be easier to identify specific medical devices used on patients. The amendment was inspired by concerns over power morcellators, which were on the market for nearly a quarter of a century before the FDA recognized the risk that the device may be spreading undiagnosed uterine cancers during laparoscopic hysterectomy and myomectomy procedures for fibroid removal. In response to the amendment, Burgess contends that, while he never used the devices himself, the FDA did not fail in its duties by not detecting the problem earlier. In fact, Burgess praised the agency, saying it has been good at issuing medical device recalls when necessary. Instead, Burgess said that all doctors who operate on the abdomen should know not to grind up suspicious tumors because they could spread cancer cells. Critics of the legislation, which now moves on to the Senate, say the bill lowers the clinical trial standards needed to approve drugs and medical devices, would increase overuse of antibiotics and the spread of drug-resistant pathogens, and would increase the ability of drug companies and medical device companies to discreetly pay doctors and medical professionals to promote their products without acknowledging the financial connection. Power Morcellator Lawsuits A number of families throughout the United States are now pursuing power morcellator lawsuits against manufacturers of the devices after women were diagnosed with the rapid spread of leiomyosarcoma, endometrial stromal sarcoma or other uterine cancers following use of the medical device. The complaints allege that power morcellators are unreasonably dangerous and that the manufacturers should have provided warnings about the potential risks associated with the device, so that women and the medical community could have decided whether the benefits provided by the minimally invasive laparoscopic procedure justify the potential risk. The FDA has estimated that about out of every 350 women undergoing surgery for symptomatic uterine fibroids may actually have undiagnosed and unsuspected sarcoma contained within the uterus. For these women, morcellators may rapidly spread cancerous cells throughout the body, rapidly upstaging the cancers to an advanced stage that is difficult to treat and often fatal. This may greatly reduce the likelihood of long-term survival and the woman’s overall quality of life. While the FDA has allowed laparoscopic morcellators to remain on the market, much stronger warnings are now provided about the potential cancer risks and many hospitals have announced that they will no longer perform hysterectomy or myomectomy procedures with morcellation, indicating that there is no way to justify the risk. Tags: Cancer, Congress, Leiomyosarcoma, Morcellation, Morcellators, Uterine Fibroid Removal, Uterine Sarcoma More Morcellation Lawsuit Stories FDA Issues New Guidelines, Safety Communication On Use Of Power Morcellators February 26, 2020 Morcellator Use Tied To Increased Risk Of Death In Women With Uterine Sarcoma: Study September 30, 2019 CDC Weighs New Guidelines For Gynecologists For Detecting Uterine Cancer May 11, 2018 0 Comments Share Your CommentsFirst Name*Last NameEmail* Shared Comments*This field is hidden when viewing the formI authorize the above comments be posted on this page Yes No Post Comment I authorize the above comments be posted on this page Weekly Digest Opt-In Yes, send me a weekly email with the latest lawsuits, recalls and warnings. Want your comments reviewed by a lawyer?To have an attorney review your comments and contact you about a potential case, provide your contact information below. This will not be published.Contact Phone #Alt Phone #Private CommentsNOTE: Providing information for review by an attorney does not form an attorney-client relationship.CAPTCHAGA SourceGA CampaignGA MediumGA ContentGA TermNameThis field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged. Δ MORE TOP STORIES Lawsuit Claims Paul Mitchell, Redken, Other Hair Dyes Led to Bladder Cancer Diagnosis for Hairdresser (Posted: 2 days ago) A hairdresser who has worked for nearly 40 years in the industry says her constant exposure to hair dye led to a bladder cancer diagnosis. MORE ABOUT: HAIR DYE LAWSUITSalon Stylist Files Lawsuit Over Bladder Cancer From Hair Dye Products (05/02/2025)Hair Color Lawsuit Alleges Bladder Cancer Caused by Salon Dye (04/25/2025)Hair Dye Cancer Lawsuit Filed Over Wrongful Death of Salon Professional (04/11/2025) First Oxbryta Lawsuit Set for Trial in August 2027, Over Recalled Sickle Cell Drug Risks (Posted: 2 days ago) An Oxbryta class action lawsuit has been scheduled for trial in August 2027, but must first survive a motion to dismiss filed by manufacturers. MORE ABOUT: OXBRYTA LAWSUITMalpractice Lawsuit Alleges Side Effects of Oxbryta Caused Untimely Death (04/15/2025)At Least 8 Lawsuits Over Oxbryta Filed Against Pfizer, Global Blood Therapeutics (03/14/2025)After Recalling Oxbryta, Pfizer Seeks Dismissal of Class Action Brought by Former Users (03/07/2025) Court Urged To Combine 5 AFFF Lawsuits For First MDL Bellwether Trial (Posted: 3 days ago) Plaintiffs have asked the judge presiding over all AFFF lawsuits to consolidate five claims involving kidney cancer and testicular cancer injuries for the first bellwether trial in the federal MDL. MORE ABOUT: AFFF LAWSUITAdditional AFFF Ulcerative Colitis Lawsuits Added to Bellwether Discovery Pool (04/29/2025)Firefighter Unions File Class Action Lawsuit Over Cancer-Causing Chemicals in Protective Gear (04/25/2025)Pennsylvania Residents File Class Action Lawsuit Over Jet Fuel Pipeline Leak (03/31/2025)
Morcellator Use Tied To Increased Risk Of Death In Women With Uterine Sarcoma: Study September 30, 2019
Lawsuit Claims Paul Mitchell, Redken, Other Hair Dyes Led to Bladder Cancer Diagnosis for Hairdresser (Posted: 2 days ago) A hairdresser who has worked for nearly 40 years in the industry says her constant exposure to hair dye led to a bladder cancer diagnosis. MORE ABOUT: HAIR DYE LAWSUITSalon Stylist Files Lawsuit Over Bladder Cancer From Hair Dye Products (05/02/2025)Hair Color Lawsuit Alleges Bladder Cancer Caused by Salon Dye (04/25/2025)Hair Dye Cancer Lawsuit Filed Over Wrongful Death of Salon Professional (04/11/2025)
First Oxbryta Lawsuit Set for Trial in August 2027, Over Recalled Sickle Cell Drug Risks (Posted: 2 days ago) An Oxbryta class action lawsuit has been scheduled for trial in August 2027, but must first survive a motion to dismiss filed by manufacturers. MORE ABOUT: OXBRYTA LAWSUITMalpractice Lawsuit Alleges Side Effects of Oxbryta Caused Untimely Death (04/15/2025)At Least 8 Lawsuits Over Oxbryta Filed Against Pfizer, Global Blood Therapeutics (03/14/2025)After Recalling Oxbryta, Pfizer Seeks Dismissal of Class Action Brought by Former Users (03/07/2025)
Court Urged To Combine 5 AFFF Lawsuits For First MDL Bellwether Trial (Posted: 3 days ago) Plaintiffs have asked the judge presiding over all AFFF lawsuits to consolidate five claims involving kidney cancer and testicular cancer injuries for the first bellwether trial in the federal MDL. MORE ABOUT: AFFF LAWSUITAdditional AFFF Ulcerative Colitis Lawsuits Added to Bellwether Discovery Pool (04/29/2025)Firefighter Unions File Class Action Lawsuit Over Cancer-Causing Chemicals in Protective Gear (04/25/2025)Pennsylvania Residents File Class Action Lawsuit Over Jet Fuel Pipeline Leak (03/31/2025)