Cancer Misdiagnosis Lawsuit Results in $2.5 Million Verdict in Nevada

|

A Nevada jury has returned a verdict of $2.5 million in a medical malpractice lawsuit filed by the family of a woman who died as a result her doctor’s misdiagnosis of cancer, which caused a delay in treatment which could have greatly improved her chances of survival.

The misdiagnosis lawsuit was filed by the family of Elisa Sanchez, who was 24 years old when she went to her doctor in 2004 complaining about blood in her stool and pain.

During that visit and subsequent appointments, Sanchez was repeatedly misdiagnosed as having hemorrhoids, causing her colon and rectal cancer to go undiagnosed for seven months.

Hair-Dye-Cancer-Lawsuits
Hair-Dye-Cancer-Lawsuits

The jury found that the doctor’s negligent failure to diagnose the cancer, order tests or make a referral to a specialist contributed to Sanchez’s 2007 death at the age of 27.

At trial, the family argued that if the doctor had properly diagnosed her cancer when Sanchez first visited him, she would have had a 97% chance of survival and that the delay reduced her chances to 50%.

Given the progressive nature of most cancers, prompt diagnosis and treatment can have a substantial impact on a patient’s ability to survive. Cancer misdiagnosis lawsuits often hinge on the plaintiff’s ability to establish that the delay had an impact on their odds of fighting the disease.

The Clark County District Court jury’s award included over $2 million in economic losses to the family, for loss of future wages and other financial damages. The verdict for pain and suffering was capped at $350,000 under the Nevada medical malpractice damages cap for non-economic damages.

According to the Las Vegas Review-Journal, the cancer misdiagnosis verdict is the largest award that has been returned in a medical malpractice lawsuit in the county since 2004.


0 Comments


Share Your Comments

This field is hidden when viewing the form
I authorize the above comments be posted on this page
Post Comment
Weekly Digest Opt-In

Want your comments reviewed by a lawyer?

To have an attorney review your comments and contact you about a potential case, provide your contact information below. This will not be published.

NOTE: Providing information for review by an attorney does not form an attorney-client relationship.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

MORE TOP STORIES

Women pursuing Depo-Provera meningioma lawsuits will have to provide documentary proof of their diagnosis and the versions of the birth control shot they received within 120 days of filing their case.
An Indiana woman has filed a Cartiva SCI implant lawsuit, indicating that the toe implant failed due to a defective design, resulting in the need for revision surgery and recommendations to permanently fuse her big toe.
Two California hair stylists filed separate lawsuits, indicating that repeated occupational exposure to toxic chemicals in hair coloring dyes caused them to develop bladder cancer.