Chantix Suicide Risk Questioned by New Study

The results of a new British study raise questions about whether side effects of Chantix, a stop smoking drug manufactured by Pfizer, increase the risk of suicides and suicide attempts. However, the researchers acknowledged that their study was limited, which could have affected the findings.

The study, which was published last week online by the British Medical Journal, analyzed a database of patients in the United Kingdom who tried to quit smoking using Chantix (varenicline) and other smoking cessation products.

Researchers from Britain’s Medicines and Healthcare Products Regulatory Agency and the University of Bristol looked at a database of more than 80,000 men and women between 18 and 95 years of age who used various anti-smoking treatments, such as Chantix, Zyban and nicotine replacement products. There were 10,973 Chantix users identified in the database, and researchers found no evidence of an increased risk for suicide, suicidal thoughts or depression with Chantix when compared to other smoking cessation products.

Did You Know?

Millions of Philips CPAP Machines Recalled

Philips DreamStation, CPAP and BiPAP machines sold in recent years may pose a risk of cancer, lung damage and other injuries.

Learn More

The findings contradict conclusions by the FDA, which ordered Pfizer to place a “black box” warning on Chantix this summer, alerting consumers that the drug had been linked to reports of psychological side effects, including suicide, depression, and hallucination. This is the strongest warning that can be placed on a prescription medication, and came after the FDA received reports of at least 90 suicides on Chantix and 188 suicide attempts.

Given the limitations of the British study, researchers cautioned that there could still be a two-fold risk of suicide with Chantix, or it may be halved. In addition, the researchers noted that suicidal thoughts were likely under-recorded in the medical databases, which raise further questions about the study. They indicate that additional research into the Chantix suicide risk is necessary.

Pfizer is currently conducting new clinical trials regarding the potential Chantix side effects, including individuals with psychiatric disorders, who were excluded from earlier studies before the drug was introduced.

Chantix was approved by FDA in 2006. It works by blocking the receptors in the brain that are commonly stimulated by nicotine, reducing the positive feelings that come from cigarettes. However, soon after Chantix was introduced, it became one of the drugs most associated with adverse event reports in the United States.

According to a report by the Institute for Safe Medication Practices, the FDA received 988 reports of serious problems involving the use of Chantix in the fourth quarter of 2007. The median average for 769 different drugs during the same quarter was only 5 reports of serious injuries per drug. Only 35 other drugs had more than 100 adverse event reports, and they included drugs like fentanyl, interferon beta, oxycodone, etanercept and other drugs used for serious illnesses, where the benefits are weighed against known risks that were typically contained in “black box” warnings.

Pfizer currently faces a growing number of Chantix lawsuits filed on behalf of users who have suffered serious or fatal injuries as a result of a suicide, suicide attempt or other unusual aggressive behavior while taking the drug. Last week, a panel of federal judges ordered that the federal Chantix litigation will be consolidated into an MDL and centralized in the Northern District of Alabama for pretrial litigation.

Image Credit: |

1 Comments

  • JohnOctober 6, 2009 at 1:48 am

    Be careful how much weight is given to this MHRC analysis. A March 2005 House of Commons Committee report (http://www.thejabberwock.org/mhra.htm) found that " The regulator, the Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency (MHRA), has failed to adequately scrutinise licensing data and its post-marketing surveillance is inadequate. The organisation has been too close to the industry, a clo[Show More]Be careful how much weight is given to this MHRC analysis. A March 2005 House of Commons Committee report (http://www.thejabberwock.org/mhra.htm) found that " The regulator, the Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency (MHRA), has failed to adequately scrutinise licensing data and its post-marketing surveillance is inadequate. The organisation has been too close to the industry, a closeness underpinned by common policy objectives, agreed processes, frequent contact, consultation and interchange of staff. We are concerned that a rather lax regime is exacerbated by the MHRA’s need to compete with other European regulators for licence application business." Half of UK NHS prescriptions are for Pfizer products. The House report notes that MHRA is funded entirely by fees derived from services to industry. MHRA's opening assertion that varenicline "seems to be the most effective smoking cessation product currently available" is contrary to the facts. While MHRA's own data suggests that UK NRT use was nearly 6 times greater than varenicline and 20 times greater than bupropion, in the only head-to-head competition with NRT varenicline failed to generate a statistically significant difference over NRT in the actual percentage of users who were not smoking at either 6 months or 1 year. Additionally, UK NHS stop smoking services data suggests that non-pharmacology quitting may actually be supeior to all forms of pharmacology, including varenicline. Why? It's simple. It's impossible to blind experienced drug addicts to the presence or absence of full-blown withdrawal. Clinical trials were a placebo sham. They didn't measure efficacy but assignment frustrations. Out in the real-world pharmacology consistently fails to prevail over those quitting without it. Hopefully someday soon the legal community will awaken to the realization that the real tort here is cessation study fraud that has prematurely sent hundreds of thousands of believers to early graves.

Share Your Comments

I authorize the above comments be posted on this page*

Want your comments reviewed by a lawyer?

To have an attorney review your comments and contact you about a potential case, provide your contact information below. This will not be published.

NOTE: Providing information for review by an attorney does not form an attorney-client relationship.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.