Sports Betting Addiction Lawsuit Sports betting addiction lawsuits are being investigated for college students and young adults who developed gambling problems after using apps like FanDuel and DraftKings, alleging that the platforms failed to warn about the addictive nature of their features and marketing practices.
Nitrous Oxide Lawsuit Individuals who suffered harm, or families who lost a loved one after using nitrous oxide products may be eligible for financial compensation through a nitrous oxide lawsuit.
Hair Relaxer Lawsuit Regular exposure to chemicals in hair relaxer may cause uterine cancer, ovarian cancer and other injuries. Women diagnosed with cancer may be eligible for settlement benefits.
Depo-Provera Lawsuit Depo-Provera lawsuits are being investigated for women who developed meningioma brain tumors after receiving Depo-Provera birth control shots, claiming that Pfizer failed to adequately disclose side effects.
Ozempic Lawsuit Lawyers are pursuing Ozempic lawsuits, Wegovy lawsuits and Mounjaro lawsuits over gastroparesis or stomach paralysis, which can leave users with long-term gastrointestinal side effects
Suboxone Tooth Decay Lawsuit Lawsuits are being pursued by users of Suboxone who experienced tooth loss, broken teeth or required dental extractions. Settlement benefits may be available.
Change Healthcare Lawsuit Lawyers are reviewing Change Healthcare class action lawsuits for individuals who had their personal information stolen due to the data breach.
Bard PowerPort Lawsuit Serious and life-threatening injuries have been linked to problems with Bard PowerPort. Lawsuits are now being pursued by individuals who suffered injuries from the implantable port catheter fracturing or migrating.
AngioDynamics Port Catheter Lawsuit Serious and life-threatening injuries have been linked to problems with Bard PowerPort. Lawsuits are now being pursued by individuals who suffered injuries from the implantable port catheter fracturing or migrating.
Processed Food Lawsuit Lawsuits are being pursued against the food industry over their manufacturing and advertising of ultra-processed foods, which have caused a generation of children to face an increased risk of developing childhood diabetes and other chronic illnesses.
Chef’s Mark Pressure Cooker Lawsuit Filed After Built Up Pressure Exploded When Lid Removed Claim joins a growing number of pressure cooker lawsuits filed that allege modern electronic devices lack safety features that should prevent the lid from being removed with built-up pressure in the cooker July 11, 2023 Irvin Jackson Add Your Comments A Georgia man has filed a product liability lawsuit after his Chef’s Mark pressure cooker exploded, causing scalding hot contents to burn his body when built up pressure inside the pot was suddenly released as the lid was removed. The complaint (PDF) was filed by David Wayne Yeoman, Jr. in the U.S. District Court for the District of Minnesota on July 3, pursuing damages from the manufacturer of the Chef’s Mark Pressure Cooker, Bluestem Brands, Inc., doing business as Fingerhut, for selling an unreasonably dangerous and defective product, which lacked adequate safety features. Yeoman indicates he suffered painful injuries in late July 2021, when the device failed to prevent the lid from being removed while the contents were still pressurized, causing the Chef’s Mark pressure cooker lid to explode off, forcefully ejecting the scalding hot contents. According to the lawsuit, the owner’s manual claimed the pressure cooker had advanced safety features, which misleads consumers into believing the pressure cooker is safe for normal use. “However, the aforementioned pressure cooker was defectively and negligently designed and manufactured by the Defendant in that it failed to properly function as to prevent the lid from being removed with normal force while the unit remained pressurized, despite the appearance that all the pressure had been released, during the ordinary, foreseeable and proper use of cooking food with the product,” the lawsuit states. “Defendant’s pressure cookers possess defects that make them unreasonably dangerous for their intended use by consumers because the lid can be rotated and opened while the unit remains pressurized.” Yeoman presents claims of defective design, defective manufacturer, failure to warn, and negligence. PRESSURE COOKER LAWSUITS Were you injured by an exploding pressure cooker? Faulty and defective designs may cause a pressure cooker to explode, resulting in severe burns and injuries. Learn More SEE IF YOU QUALIFY FOR COMPENSATION PRESSURE COOKER LAWSUITS Were you injured by an exploding pressure cooker? Faulty and defective designs may cause a pressure cooker to explode, resulting in severe burns and injuries. Learn More SEE IF YOU QUALIFY FOR COMPENSATION Pressure Cooker Explosion Lawsuits Yeoman’s complaint raises allegations similar to those presented in a growing number of pressure cooker lawsuits filed in recent months, each pointing to design problems with many modern electronic pressure cookers, including Ninja Foodi, Instant Pot, Crock Pot and others, which were sold without available safety features that could prevent the lid from being removed while built up pressure remained inside the pot. Modern electronic pressure cookers have become popular in recent decades, amid marketing that has promoted advanced features that were supposed to prevent pressure cooker explosions that have plagued older, stove-top designs. Products have been marketed under a number of brand names, through social media, websites and home shopping stations. Most of the problems involve similar pressure cooker burn injuries which occurred after the lid exploded off while the contents were still pressurized, typically resulting in burns covering a large percentage of the user’s body. However, other injuries linked to pressure cookers have included eye injuries, broken bones and other complications that resulted from electrocutions, spills or explosions. As more of these electric pressure cookers have been introduced in recent years, the U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission has issued several pressure cooker recalls over problems where lids were able to be opened while contents are under pressure, allowing hot contents to be expelled and causing a scald or burn injury to individuals in the immediate area. Tags: Burns, Explosion, Pressure Cooker More Pressure Cooker Lawsuit Stories $9.1M Pressure Cooker Lawsuit Payout Upheld for Burn Injury Victim June 3, 2025 Ninja Nutri Pro Blender Lawsuit Indicates Woman Severely Burned When Lid Exploded Off May 28, 2025 Ninja Foodi Recall Lawsuit Alleges Pressure Cooker Explosion Risks Were Known by SharkNinja May 15, 2025 0 Comments Share Your CommentsFirst Name*Last NameEmail* Shared Comments*This field is hidden when viewing the formI authorize the above comments be posted on this page Yes No Post Comment I authorize the above comments be posted on this page Weekly Digest Opt-In Yes, send me a weekly email with the latest lawsuits, recalls and warnings. Want your comments reviewed by a lawyer?To have an attorney review your comments and contact you about a potential case, provide your contact information below. This will not be published.Contact Phone #Alt Phone #Private CommentsNOTE: Providing information for review by an attorney does not form an attorney-client relationship.CAPTCHAGA SourceGA CampaignGA MediumGA ContentGA TermPhoneThis field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged. Δ MORE TOP STORIES Lawsuit Indicates Risk of Depo-Provera Meningioma Growth Poses Constant Distress (Posted: today) A Depo-Provera lawsuit claims that a Kentucky woman will have to undergo MRI scans for the rest of her life due to the development of an intracranial Meningioma following 40 injections of the birth control treatment. MORE ABOUT: DEPO-PROVERA LAWSUITLawsuit Alleges Intracranial Meningioma From Depo-Provera Resulted in Need for Lifelong Medical Monitoring (05/28/2025)Depo-Provera Lawsuit Sign Ups Expected To Continue as First Brain Tumor Cases Prepared for Trial (05/23/2025)Court Outlines Requirements for Depo-Provera Lawsuit Proof of Use, Type of Meningioma Tumor (05/15/2025) Wrongful Death Lawsuit Links Oxbryta Side Effects to Deadly Vaso-Occlusive Crises (Posted: yesterday) A wrongful death lawsuit claims a Tennessee man suffered severe Oxbryta side effects, leading to stroke, complications and death. MORE ABOUT: OXBRYTA LAWSUITOxbryta Recall Lawsuit Alleges Sickle Cell Drug Increased Frequency of Dangerous VOCs (05/23/2025)First Oxbryta Lawsuit Set for Trial in August 2027, Over Recalled Sickle Cell Drug Risks (05/09/2025)Malpractice Lawsuit Alleges Side Effects of Oxbryta Caused Untimely Death (04/15/2025) Lawsuit Claims Biozorb Implant Penetrated Skin, Causing Massive Infection (Posted: 2 days ago) A BioZorb lawsuit claims that the recalled implant’s defective design led to the device migrating through a woman’s flesh, causing a severe infection. MORE ABOUT: BIOZORB LAWSUITBreast Cancer Survivors File BioZorb Tissue Marker Lawsuit After Implant Fails (05/20/2025)BioZorb Implant Lawsuit Alleges Tissue Marker Caused Swelling, Fluid Buildup and Chronic Pain (05/14/2025)Four Women File BioZorb Lawsuit Over Breast Tissue Marker Failures and Injuries (05/05/2025)
Ninja Foodi Recall Lawsuit Alleges Pressure Cooker Explosion Risks Were Known by SharkNinja May 15, 2025
Lawsuit Indicates Risk of Depo-Provera Meningioma Growth Poses Constant Distress (Posted: today) A Depo-Provera lawsuit claims that a Kentucky woman will have to undergo MRI scans for the rest of her life due to the development of an intracranial Meningioma following 40 injections of the birth control treatment. MORE ABOUT: DEPO-PROVERA LAWSUITLawsuit Alleges Intracranial Meningioma From Depo-Provera Resulted in Need for Lifelong Medical Monitoring (05/28/2025)Depo-Provera Lawsuit Sign Ups Expected To Continue as First Brain Tumor Cases Prepared for Trial (05/23/2025)Court Outlines Requirements for Depo-Provera Lawsuit Proof of Use, Type of Meningioma Tumor (05/15/2025)
Wrongful Death Lawsuit Links Oxbryta Side Effects to Deadly Vaso-Occlusive Crises (Posted: yesterday) A wrongful death lawsuit claims a Tennessee man suffered severe Oxbryta side effects, leading to stroke, complications and death. MORE ABOUT: OXBRYTA LAWSUITOxbryta Recall Lawsuit Alleges Sickle Cell Drug Increased Frequency of Dangerous VOCs (05/23/2025)First Oxbryta Lawsuit Set for Trial in August 2027, Over Recalled Sickle Cell Drug Risks (05/09/2025)Malpractice Lawsuit Alleges Side Effects of Oxbryta Caused Untimely Death (04/15/2025)
Lawsuit Claims Biozorb Implant Penetrated Skin, Causing Massive Infection (Posted: 2 days ago) A BioZorb lawsuit claims that the recalled implant’s defective design led to the device migrating through a woman’s flesh, causing a severe infection. MORE ABOUT: BIOZORB LAWSUITBreast Cancer Survivors File BioZorb Tissue Marker Lawsuit After Implant Fails (05/20/2025)BioZorb Implant Lawsuit Alleges Tissue Marker Caused Swelling, Fluid Buildup and Chronic Pain (05/14/2025)Four Women File BioZorb Lawsuit Over Breast Tissue Marker Failures and Injuries (05/05/2025)