Chevrolet Bolt Class Action Lawsuit Filed Over Battery Fire Risks

General Motors failed to properly fix Bolt electric vehicles prone to catching on fire, resulting in a smaller driving range, lower battery charge and a continuing risk of fires, the lawsuit claims

Following a series of Chevrolet Bolt EV recalls, a class action lawsuit has been filed against General Motors, which alleges the manufacturer failed to properly fix battery issues to save profits, while putting consumers at risk of fires caused by the electric vehicles.

The complaint (PDF) was filed by David Kennedy in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California on December 23, alleging the Chevrolet Bolt vehicles are unsafe due to dangerous battery defects. In addition, since the recall remedy limits the battery capacity to 90% charge, plaintiffs claim the electric vehicles fail to live up to the advertised travel range.

After the battery problems emerged in November 2020, a growing number of Chevrolet Bolt class action lawsuits have been filed against General Motors, each raising similar questions of fact and law. However, the litigation has not been centralized in the federal court system, so individual claims are moving forward in several U.S. District Courts.

Did You Know?

AT&T Data Breach Impacts Millions of Customers

More than 73 million customers of AT&T may have had their names, addresses, phone numbers, Social Security numbers and other information released on the dark web due to a massive AT&T data breach. Lawsuits are being pursued to obtain financial compensation.

Learn More

Kennedy indicates he leased a now-recalled 2022 Chevrolet Bolt EV in July, agreeing to pay $6,000 down and a monthly lease of $271.65 for 35 months, totaling $31,995. Kennedy claims his agreement to lease the vehicle was based on it being an environmentally friendly electric vehicle option with a long distance range.

However, Kennedy indicates General Motors “falsely represents the safety of the Class Vehicles as well as the expected battery usage and mileage capacity”, since the automaker advised owners they should not let their vehicles drop below 70 miles of range and to not charge the battery above 90 percent capacity to prevent the risk of the vehicles battery overheating and catching on fire.

Kennedy further claims he, and other owners of impacted Bolt EV vehicles, must follow the manufactures warning to park the vehicles outside, and at least 50 feet away from other vehicles or structures to prevent the spread of a battery fire.

“Plaintiff and the Class have suffered injury in fact and have lost money as a result of Defendant’s false, deceptive, and misleading representations,” Kennedy states in the lawsuit. He says this has forced him to use other means of transportation, spend more on gas and limit the use of the vehicle to avoid bodily injury or death from a battery fire.

The lawsuit seeks class action status to pursue damages on behalf of Kennedy, and all individuals similarly situated who have been stranded with the defective battery issue in various model year Bolt EV and Bolt EUV cars. The lawsuit includes claims for fraudulent concealment, false and misleading advertising and failure to recall.

Chevrolet Bolt Recalls and Warning

According to the Chevrolet Bolt EV recall issued in November 2020, the cells used in the 60 kWh 350 V lithium-ion battery, which were installed in approximately 50,932 model year 2017 through 2018, as well as certain 2019 Chevrolet Bolt EV vehicles, are root cause of the problems.  However, later the manufacture added model years 2020 through 2022 to the recall as well.

Critics say GM has provided owners with a sub-par fix, which involves a software update to look for deficiencies in the batteries as a final remedy. Owners were instructed that until the software update could be done to activate either the Hill Top Reserve (2017 and 2018 models) or Target Charge Level (2019 models) feature in their vehicle to limit the charge level to 90%.

However, on July 23, 2021, NHTSA officials issued a Chevrolet Bolt EV battery warning, instructing owners to limit the vehicles’ charge capacity and continue parking the vehicles outside and away from structures, even if it the vehicle already been “repaired”, following at least three new fires that were reported. The warning also instructed owners to avoid depleting the battery to 70 miles range remaining and to not charge the vehicles overnight.

Officials warned the battery cell packs in the recalled vehicles still have the potential to smoke and ignite internally even after repairs, which could spread to the rest of the vehicle and cause a structure fire if the vehicle is parked inside a garage or near a house.


Share Your Comments

I authorize the above comments be posted on this page*

Want your comments reviewed by a lawyer?

To have an attorney review your comments and contact you about a potential case, provide your contact information below. This will not be published.

NOTE: Providing information for review by an attorney does not form an attorney-client relationship.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

More Top Stories

Gardasil Vaccine Lawsuits Being Prepared For Early Test Trials in Federal MDL
Gardasil Vaccine Lawsuits Being Prepared For Early Test Trials in Federal MDL (Posted yesterday)

In advance of a a conference this week, lawyers report that progress is being made to prepare a group of federal Gardasil vaccine lawsuits for early test trials, to help gauge how juries may respond to certain evidence and testimony that will be repeated throughout the litigation.

Enfamil Lawsuit Claims Preemie Developed NEC After Being Fed Cow's Milk-Based Infant Formula
Enfamil Lawsuit Claims Preemie Developed NEC After Being Fed Cow's Milk-Based Infant Formula (Posted 2 days ago)

Cow's milk-based infant formula products are dangerous for premature infants, according to a mother's recent Enfamil lawsuit, filed after her newborn developed necrotizing enterocolitis and suffered through surgery and continuing negative health effects.

Ozempic MDL Lawsuits Reassigned To New Judge For Further Pretrial Proceedings
Ozempic MDL Lawsuits Reassigned To New Judge For Further Pretrial Proceedings (Posted 5 days ago)

All lawsuits over Ozempic, Mounjaro, Wegovy and other GLP-1 RA drugs to U.S. District Judge Karen S. Marston, following the death last month of the judge originally appointed to preside over all claims involving stomach paralysis and other gastrointestinal injuries.