3M Ignored Combat Arms Earplug Problems To Win Indefinite-Quantity Contracts With Military, Lawsuit Claims

According to allegations raised in a recently filed product liability lawsuit, 3M Company ignored warning signs that its Combat Arms earplugs could damage the hearing of military personnel as part of an effort to win and maintain lucrative government contracts.

Kevin Doyle filed the complaint (PDF) late last month in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana, 3M Company and it’s Aearo Technologies LLC subsidiary knew or should have known that the military earplugs posed a substantial risk of harm to service members, but failed to provide warnings or instructions necessary to ensure the earplugs properly fit the ear.

According to the lawsuit, Doyle enlisted in the U.S. Marine Corps in 1993 and then later joined the army as a certified weapons instructor. He was provided standard issue dual-ended 3M Combat Arms earplugs for training and on deployment to the Middle East, but indicates that design defects with the earplugs caused him to suffer tinnitus and hearing loss.

Spinal-Cord-Stimulation-Lawsuit
Spinal-Cord-Stimulation-Lawsuit

The 3M earplugs were designed to serve as traditional earplugs when inserted one way, and provide filtering for certain noises when reversed. The manufacturer has maintained this was supposed to block loud noises, while letting the wearer hear spoken commands and other quiet sounds. However, a growing number ofย Combat Arms earplug lawsuitsย have been filed in recent months, alleging that 3M Company has known the product was defective for years.

Doyle and other plaintiffs say the manufacturers failed to adequately test the earplugs, and knew that the testing procedures were inadequate and that the noise ratings assigned to the earplugs were inaccurate.

โ€œBased on the supposed technological design and qualities of the Combat Arms Earplugs, (Defendants won) a series of Indefinite-Quantity Contracts (ICQs) to be the exclusive supplier of selective attenuation earplugs to the U.S. military between 2003 and 2012,โ€ Doyleโ€™s lawsuit states. โ€œTo win these ICQs Defendants represented that the Combat Arms Earplugs would meet specific performance criteria established by the U.S. Government as a prerequisite for bidding on the IQC for earplugs.โ€

The lawsuit claims first Aearo, then later 3M, falsified test results to meet those requirements, then underbid competitors for the contract. This may have caused hearing damage to tens of thousands, or even hundreds of thousands, of U.S. military personnel as a result.

โ€œBecause the defect was imperceptible to the wearer, Defendantsโ€™ design defect went undetected for more than a decade by the U.S. military and those who wore them,โ€ the lawsuit states. โ€œIt is thus not surprising that hearing damage is now the largest ongoing medical cost the military incurs each year.โ€

In July 2018, 3M reached aย settlement over the Combat Arms earplug problemsย with the Department of Justice, resolving claims that it defrauded the government by knowingly selling the defective earplugs, and then by causing soldiers to suffer hearing loss whose health issues have to be addressed by the government.

As more U.S. military veterans learn thatย hearing loss and tinnitus may be the result of defective military ear plugs, the number of individual product liability 3M Combat Arms lawsuits pending in courts nationwide is expected to increase dramatically in the coming months.

Irvin Jackson
Written by: Irvin Jackson

Senior Legal Journalist & Contributing Editor

Irvin Jackson is a senior investigative reporter at AboutLawsuits.com with more than 30 years of experience covering mass tort litigation, environmental policy, and consumer safety. He previously served as Associate Editor at Inside the EPA and contributes original reporting on product liability lawsuits, regulatory failures, and nationwide litigation trends.




0 Comments


This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

Share Your Comments

This field is hidden when viewing the form
I authorize the above comments be posted on this page
Post Comment
Weekly Digest Opt-In

Want your comments reviewed by a lawyer?

To have an attorney review your comments and contact you about a potential case, provide your contact information below. This will not be published.

NOTE: Providing information for review by an attorney does not form an attorney-client relationship.

MORE TOP STORIES

According to a lawsuit brought against the manufacturer and the FDA, an Abbott Eterna spinal cord stimulator has caused pain, shocks and complications instead of the relief promised.
A Depo-Provera intracranial meningioma lawsuit claims Pfizer developed and sold a defective birth control injection that puts women at a five times increased risk of brain tumors.
A lawsuit alleges an Illinois woman developed CTCL after using Dupixent, raising concerns the manufacturer may have withheld concerns that the drug could contribute to cancer.