FDA Calls For Transition Away From Decontaminated Disposable Respirators As Supply Rebounds

Federal health regulators say it is now safe for hospitals and other health care facilities to transition away from decontaminating and reusing disposable face masks and similar respirators, which was necessary over the last year as the nationโ€™s healthcare system struggled to handle the flood of COVID-19 cases.

In a letter to health care personnel and facilities sent on April 9, the FDA indicates that is time to stop using decontaminated disposable respirators; a practice which became widespread due to a respirator shortage caused by the coronavirus outbreak.

At the height of the pandemic last year, many hospitals and other health care facilities began reusing face masks which were designed to be disposable. This required the respirators be decontaminated, or undergo bioburden reduction, before being reused. Otherwise, they could have spread COVID-19 and other infections from one patient to the next.

Sports-Betting-Addiction-Lawsuits
Sports-Betting-Addiction-Lawsuits

According to the FDAโ€™s announcement, the National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH), a division of the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), recently approved a new domestic supply of respirators, which has significantly bolstered the supply of respirators, such as the N95 mask and other filtering facepiece respirators (FFRs), which has alleviated the need for reusing disposable ones.

According to the letter, NIOSH has approved more than 875 respirator models or configurations from January 2020 through April 2021. However, the FDA is not yet revoking the emergency use authorizations (EUAs), which allowed hospitals to reuse the disposable respirators. Instead, the agency is calling for a transition away from reusing the devices.

โ€œThe FDA and CDC believe there is adequate supply of respirators to transition away from use of decontamination and bioburden reduction systems. However, the FDA is not revoking the EUAs for decontamination and bioburden reduction systems at this time,โ€ the letter states. โ€œIf there are insufficient supplies of FFRs resulting from the COVID-19 pandemic, health care personnel may continue to use currently-authorized decontamination and bioburden reduction systems, though such reuse of respirators should be limited to when no other respirators are available, including reusable respirators such as elastomeric respirators or PAPRs (powered air-purifying respirators).โ€

The FDA recommends health care personnel and facilities work to limit decontamination of disposable respirators, transition away from the crisis capacity strategy for respirators, and increase their available inventories of NIOSH-approved respirators.

Written by: Irvin Jackson

Senior Legal Journalist & Contributing Editor

Irvin Jackson is a senior investigative reporter at AboutLawsuits.com with more than 30 years of experience covering mass tort litigation, environmental policy, and consumer safety. He previously served as Associate Editor at Inside the EPA and contributes original reporting on product liability lawsuits, regulatory failures, and nationwide litigation trends.




0 Comments


This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

Share Your Comments

This field is hidden when viewing the form
I authorize the above comments be posted on this page
Post Comment
Weekly Digest Opt-In

Want your comments reviewed by a lawyer?

To have an attorney review your comments and contact you about a potential case, provide your contact information below. This will not be published.

NOTE: Providing information for review by an attorney does not form an attorney-client relationship.

MORE TOP STORIES

In a joint statement, plaintiffs and defendants in AngioDynamics port catheter lawsuits have laid guidelines for what types of cases should be selected to serve as potential bellwether trials.
Women who experienced infection, chronic inflammation, implant instability or other complications after internal bra mesh procedures are now questioning whether those risks were fully disclosed before implantation.
More than 3,300 women have filed Depo-Provera lawsuits in federal court, with several hundred more also pending in state courts in New York and Delaware, according to a recent status report.