CPSC Reports Defective Chinese Drywall in Homes in 24 States

  • Written by: AboutLawsuits
  • 1 Comment

The U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission (CPSC) has received about new 270 reports of defective Chinese drywall problems, bringing the total number of reports to at least 877 homes from 24 different states across the country.

The CPSC recently issued an August 2009 update to congressional lawmakers on the status of their investigation into the problems with defective Chinese drywall, which has been blamed for causing foul sulfuric odors, corroding wiring and electrical appliances, and various health complaints.

A website created to track the CPSC investigation, the Drywall Information Center, contains summaries of 44 consumer incident investigations and other information about the defective drywall, including information to help homeowners determine if they may have a Chinese drywall problem.

While the majority of reports received by the CPSC have come from Florida (75%), Louisiana (15%) and Virginia (3%), others have come from consumers in Alabama, Arizona, California, Georgia, Indiana, Kentucky, Massachusetts, Michigan, Mississippi, Missouri, New Jersey, New York, North Carolina, Ohio, Pennsylvania, South Carolina, Tennessee, Texas, Washington, Wisconsin, Wyoming, and the District of Columbia.

Millions of sheets of defective drywall were imported from China into the United States between 2004 and 2007, due to a domestic shortage caused by a housing boom and construction following a serious of hurricanes that struck the southeastern United States. The CPSC has confirmed more 6 million sheets were imported into the country in 2006, and additional temporary support personnel are being brought in to verify more shipments.

In July, the CPSC reported that it started testing at the Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory to isolate specific emissions, and began air sampling in 50 homes. The CPSC also announced that testing for radioactive phosphogypsum has completed and will be available in a few days.

Chinese drywall lawsuits have been filed by home owners throughout the United States against drywall manufacturers and distributers. In June, all of the federal drywall litigation was consolidated and centralized in an MDL, or Multidistrict Litigation. The cases were assigned to U.S. District Judge Eldon E. Fallon, who has put the cases on a “fast track,” with trials involving property damage claims set to begin in early 2010.

Tags: , , ,

1 comment

  1. Armando Reply

    This problem has more than a year, as it is possible that the main importer of this Drywall walk freely through the streets of Miami making more dirty business. Why not somebody goes to make him an interview about his scams?

    His company “La Suprema Enterprise” had an exclusive contract with Knauf Tianjin in 2006 and brought to Florida no less than 170,100,000 pounds of Drywall, 1,890,000 boards used to build over 20,000 homes now have serious problems. This is the most important factory who sent this bad drywall. Besides they importing more Drywall from Indonesia and south Korea, according Bill of ladings. And what about of the drywall from Mexico????

    This gentleman is that nobody is going to claim anything? Why not make it show his hidden documentation? What else he buy in China? Where he send merchandise??

    He knew perfectly well the problem of the smell, because he send to make an analysis to the same Knauf Tianjin and everyone knows what is the answer. Some people said that the old warehouse of them still smelling bad.

    According to the laws the importer is responsible.

    And who is responsible for the waste now being removed in the repair of houses, remember that these wastes also emit sulfur gases, and our children are the streets.

  • Share Your Comments

  • Have Your Comments Reviewed by a Lawyer

    Provide additional contact information if you want an attorney to review your comments and contact you about a potential case. This information will not be published.
  • NOTE: Providing information for review by an attorney does not form an attorney-client relationship.

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.