Breast Mesh Lawsuit Lawyers are investigating breast mesh lawsuits for women who suffered infections, pain, or implant failure from internal bra implants used in breast reconstruction surgery.
Ozempic Lawsuit Lawyers are pursuing Ozempic lawsuits, Wegovy lawsuits and Mounjaro lawsuits over gastroparesis or stomach paralysis, which can leave users with long-term gastrointestinal side effects
Suboxone Tooth Decay Lawsuit Lawsuits are being pursued by users of Suboxone who experienced tooth loss, broken teeth or required dental extractions. Settlement benefits may be available.
Depo-Provera Lawsuit Depo-Provera lawsuits are being investigated for women who developed meningioma brain tumors after receiving Depo-Provera birth control shots, claiming that Pfizer failed to adequately disclose side effects.
Hair Relaxer Lawsuit Regular exposure to chemicals in hair relaxer may cause uterine cancer, ovarian cancer and other injuries. Women diagnosed with cancer may be eligible for settlement benefits.
AngioDynamics Port Catheter Lawsuit Serious and life-threatening injuries have been linked to problems with Bard PowerPort. Lawsuits are now being pursued by individuals who suffered injuries from the implantable port catheter fracturing or migrating.
Bard PowerPort Lawsuit Serious and life-threatening injuries have been linked to problems with Bard PowerPort. Lawsuits are now being pursued by individuals who suffered injuries from the implantable port catheter fracturing or migrating.
Nitrous Oxide Lawsuit Individuals who suffered harm, or families who lost a loved one after using nitrous oxide products may be eligible for financial compensation through a nitrous oxide lawsuit.
Dupixent Lawsuit Dupixent lawsuits are being investigated for patients who developed rare blood cancers such as cutaneous T-cell lymphoma (CTCL) after receiving injections, alleging that Sanofi and Regeneron failed to warn about the potential risks of immune suppression and delayed cancer diagnosis.
Sports Betting Addiction Lawsuit Sports betting addiction lawsuits are being investigated for college students and young adults who developed gambling problems after using apps like FanDuel and DraftKings, alleging that the platforms failed to warn about the addictive nature of their features and marketing practices.
David Lerner Associates Arbitration Lawsuits Filed Over Apple REITs June 8, 2011 Staff Writers Add Your Comments A complaint has been filed by federal regulators against David Lerner & Associates, Inc. for selling Apple REIT Ten non-traded shares to customers, without regard to whether they were a suitable investment. A number of investors are now pursuing arbitration claims or lawsuits against David Lerner Associates to recover their investment losses.ย The Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA) filed charges against David Lerner Associates on May 31, accusing the company of targeting elderly and unsophisticated investors to sell them Apple Real Estate Investment Trust shares in order to cash in on lucrative commissions. FINRA claims the shares were sold with little or no consideration for the welfare of the investors. The authority also claims that David Lerner Associates failed to question why Apple REIT Ten unreasonably valued the shares at a constant price of $11, regardless of market fluctuations or actual performance, even during the rough economic times rocking the real estate industry. Do You Know about… SPORTS BETTING ADDICTION LAWSUITs Gambling addiction and severe financial losses have been linked to popular sports betting platforms like DraftKings, FanDuel, and Caesars. Lawsuits are being filed by young adults and students who were targeted by deceptive promotions, addictive app features, and aggressive marketing tactics. Learn More SEE IF YOU QUALIFY FOR COMPENSATION Do You Know Aboutโฆ SPORTS BETTING ADDICTION LAWSUITs Gambling addiction and severe financial losses have been linked to popular sports betting platforms like DraftKings, FanDuel, and Caesars. Lawsuits are being filed by young adults and students who were targeted by deceptive promotions, addictive app features, and aggressive marketing tactics. Learn More SEE IF YOU QUALIFY FOR COMPENSATION The charges have sparked a number of FINRA investor arbitration lawsuits by former David Lerner Associates clients who were sold Apple REIT Ten shares. The claims allege that unsophisticated clients of limited financial means were repeatedly told the Apple non-traded REITs were “safe and secure” and “would not lose money.” Investor claims against the firm include allegations of fraud, misrepresentations and omissions, suitability and breach of fiduciary duty. The investors are seeking compensatory damages, attorney fees, costs and punitive damages. FINRA is a non-governmental regulatory body that handles the resolution of disputes between investors and stockbrokers and other financial firms. It was created in July 2007 as a successor to the National Association of Securities Dealers, to arbitrate stock broker fraud claims that can include charges of breach of contract, breach of fiduciary duty, negligence, misrepresentation, unauthorized trading and other claims that investments were improperly handled. According to FINRA, David Lerner Associates (DLA) has been the only underwriter for Apple REITs since 1992, and has sold $6.8 billion of the securities, which has accounted for 60 to 70% of the DLA’s business since 1996. DLA receives a 10% commission for all Apple REIT sales, in addition to other fees. David Lerner Associates has the option of responding to FINRA’s disciplinary complaint and requesting a hearing. The complaint does not represent a final decision on the part of FINRA, but if the panel does decide to discipline DLA, the firm could face fines, censure, be forced to pay back investors or be suspended or barred from the securities industry. According to a David Lerner Associates press release, the FINRA complaint is “baseless” and “rife with falsehoods.” The company suggests that the claims against it are tied to the so-called ponzi scheme by convicted investment advisor Bernard Madoff, who defrauded billions of dollars from thousands of investors, but does not explain the connection. “It is apparent to us that DLA and other small firms have become the scapegoats for FINRA’s utter failure to address Madoff’s fraudulent scheme,” the DLA press release states. Tags: Arbitration, Financial Advisor, FINRA, FINRA Arbitration, Investment Arbitration, Investor Lawsuit, Stock Broker Fraud Image Credit: | More Lawsuit Stories Lawyers To Nominate Hair Relaxer Cancer Cases for Early Bellwether Trials Next Week March 12, 2026 Enfamil Lawsuit Claims Premature Infant Required Partial Intestine Removal From NEC Side Effects March 12, 2026 Stainless Steel Apple Watch Bandโ Lawsuit Filed Over Burn Injury Risks March 12, 2026 4 Comments Domenick August 1, 2013 Joe , did you get any of your principal out of those apple reits ? ( other than what DL sent you and called it dividends ). Paul June 12, 2011 I agree with you Joe. I’ve done nothing but make money at DLA! I own Apple Six and have realized a 70% ROI. I wouldn’t have made that in the stock market! David June 10, 2011 This is much more than a witch hunt, Joe. This is a long overdue disciplinary action that DLA had coming based on it’s past transgressions – I honestly do not know how David Lerner Associates can call themselves an investment company. According to allegations outlined by FINRA, DLA used the valuations and distribution rates of the closed Apple REITs to sell shares of Apple REIT Ten โ distribution rates that FINRA believes were financed by debt. In addition, in the last seven years, Apple REITs have been valued at a constant price regardless of significant changes in the real estate market. Instead of investigating these very strange valuations and distribution rates, the investment company used them to sell Apple REIT Ten. joe June 8, 2011 I have been investing with d lerner since 2002. bonds and reits.2 thru 9. I have nothing but high praise for dla I have never lost money and I recommend dla all the time. This is nothing more than a witch hunt NameThis field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.Share Your CommentsFirst Name*Last NameEmail* Shared Comments*This field is hidden when viewing the formI authorize the above comments be posted on this page Yes No Post Comment I authorize the above comments be posted on this page Weekly Digest Opt-In Yes, send me a weekly email with the latest lawsuits, recalls and warnings. Want your comments reviewed by a lawyer?To have an attorney review your comments and contact you about a potential case, provide your contact information below. This will not be published.Contact Phone #Alt Phone #Private CommentsNOTE: Providing information for review by an attorney does not form an attorney-client relationship.CAPTCHAGA SourceGA CampaignGA MediumGA ContentGA Term Δ MORE TOP STORIES Lawyers To Nominate Hair Relaxer Cancer Cases for Early Bellwether Trials Next Week (Posted: today) Plaintiffs and defendants involved in hair relaxer cancer lawsuits are expected to turn in a list of 12 cases that the parties believe are fit to serve as bellwether trials. MORE ABOUT: HAIR RELAXER LAWSUITCourt Outlines Procedures When Women Die After Filing a Hair Relaxer Cancer Lawsuit (02/25/2026)Hair Extension Chemicals May Be More Harmful Than Previously Thought: Study (02/17/2026)MDL Judge Issues New Deadlines for Hair Relaxer Lawsuit Bellwether Trial Preparations (02/04/2026) Cartiva Implant Recall Lawsuits Move Forward, as Plaintiffs Seek Compensation for Big Toe Surgery Failures (Posted: yesterday) Cartiva implant lawsuits are moving forward in federal court as patients across the United States seek compensation for complications linked to the recalled big toe device. MORE ABOUT: CARTIVA IMPLANT LAWSUITCartiva Synthetic Cartilage Implant Lawsuits Centralized in Federal MDL (02/10/2026)Lawsuit Alleges Cartiva Implant Loosened, Degraded in Great Toe (02/05/2026)Big Toe Fusion Lawsuit Filed Over Failed Cartiva SCI Implant (01/27/2026) Abbott Spinal Cord Stimulator Lawsuit Alleges Defects Caused Lead Migration, Electric Shocks (Posted: 2 days ago) An Abbott spinal cord stimulator lawsuit filed by three women says the product was defectively designed, inappropriately approved by the FDA, and left them with severe injuries, worsening pain and the need for removal surgery. MORE ABOUT: SPINAL CORD STIMULATOR LAWSUITLawsuit Claims Airport Body Scanner Destroyed Woman’s Spinal Cord Stimulator, Requiring Surgical Removal (03/03/2026)Medtronic Spinal Cord Stimulator Lawsuit Filed Over Unnecessary Shocking Sensations (02/27/2026)Boston Scientific Pacemaker Lawsuit Claims Recalled Device Caused Life-Threatening Situation (02/25/2026)
Enfamil Lawsuit Claims Premature Infant Required Partial Intestine Removal From NEC Side Effects March 12, 2026
Lawyers To Nominate Hair Relaxer Cancer Cases for Early Bellwether Trials Next Week (Posted: today) Plaintiffs and defendants involved in hair relaxer cancer lawsuits are expected to turn in a list of 12 cases that the parties believe are fit to serve as bellwether trials. MORE ABOUT: HAIR RELAXER LAWSUITCourt Outlines Procedures When Women Die After Filing a Hair Relaxer Cancer Lawsuit (02/25/2026)Hair Extension Chemicals May Be More Harmful Than Previously Thought: Study (02/17/2026)MDL Judge Issues New Deadlines for Hair Relaxer Lawsuit Bellwether Trial Preparations (02/04/2026)
Cartiva Implant Recall Lawsuits Move Forward, as Plaintiffs Seek Compensation for Big Toe Surgery Failures (Posted: yesterday) Cartiva implant lawsuits are moving forward in federal court as patients across the United States seek compensation for complications linked to the recalled big toe device. MORE ABOUT: CARTIVA IMPLANT LAWSUITCartiva Synthetic Cartilage Implant Lawsuits Centralized in Federal MDL (02/10/2026)Lawsuit Alleges Cartiva Implant Loosened, Degraded in Great Toe (02/05/2026)Big Toe Fusion Lawsuit Filed Over Failed Cartiva SCI Implant (01/27/2026)
Abbott Spinal Cord Stimulator Lawsuit Alleges Defects Caused Lead Migration, Electric Shocks (Posted: 2 days ago) An Abbott spinal cord stimulator lawsuit filed by three women says the product was defectively designed, inappropriately approved by the FDA, and left them with severe injuries, worsening pain and the need for removal surgery. MORE ABOUT: SPINAL CORD STIMULATOR LAWSUITLawsuit Claims Airport Body Scanner Destroyed Woman’s Spinal Cord Stimulator, Requiring Surgical Removal (03/03/2026)Medtronic Spinal Cord Stimulator Lawsuit Filed Over Unnecessary Shocking Sensations (02/27/2026)Boston Scientific Pacemaker Lawsuit Claims Recalled Device Caused Life-Threatening Situation (02/25/2026)